Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

The ski case? That was totally different. And Gwyneth Paltrow sort of owns who she is which makes her more likeable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

GP was the defendant. She didnt have the burden of proof

[Anonymous]

Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

The fact that he initiated a retaliation campaign is not particularly disputable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

GP was the defendant. She didnt have the burden of proof

But we're not talking about proof. Remember likability is all that matters according to some. It matters if people like them and I distinctly recall people didn't like Gwyneth or her demeanor in court but the facts win in the end, don't they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

Blah blah. It won't be that hard for her to prove her case. The evidence is obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

Blah blah. It won't be that hard for her to prove her case. The evidence is obvious.

No one can say you aren’t steadfast in your opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

GP was the defendant. She didnt have the burden of proof

But we're not talking about proof. Remember likability is all that matters according to some. It matters if people like them and I distinctly recall people didn't like Gwyneth or her demeanor in court but the facts win in the end, don't they?

I propose that whenever a woman claims sexual harassment, the trial should establish how likeable she is and go over her entire sexual history to establish whether she is a slut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

Blah blah. It won't be that hard for her to prove her case. The evidence is obvious.

No one can say you aren’t steadfast in your opinion.

And I don't even have to call anyone names in order to make a point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

GP was the defendant. She didnt have the burden of proof

But we're not talking about proof. Remember likability is all that matters according to some. It matters if people like them and I distinctly recall people didn't like Gwyneth or her demeanor in court but the facts win in the end, don't they?

Blake is not liked and her behavior with respect to the movie is also being viewed unfavorably and we haven’t even seen his counterclaim or all the texts. I don’t think this will go to trial, Blake and Ryan will want to avoid discovery. At this point, they will want to try to save Ryan’s career, if they can. Hers is likely over, at least with respect to independent productions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

Blah blah. It won't be that hard for her to prove her case. The evidence is obvious.

No one can say you aren’t steadfast in your opinion.

And I don't even have to call anyone names in order to make a point.

That is far from true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A poll in a New York Post article showed that 60 percent of their readers side with Justin Baldoni..I am really sorry for the Blake Lively fan club that the relentless arguing with those who do not like Blake has not resulted in a more positive image for her.

Actually the point repeatedly being obscured is that whether she is likeable is irrelevant.

Her legit RETALIATION claim and evidence of that is and will be absolutely relevant, legally speaking

But people judge the demeanor of witnesses in court and it does matter if people like them. They are less likely to believe people they do not like.

Facts of the case matter most. Keep trying though.

Dp, but those don’t appear to be in her favor either.

We'll see. Gwyneth Paltrow is not a fan favorite here either but she won her case. Don't hold your breath PP.

GP was the defendant. She didnt have the burden of proof

But we're not talking about proof. Remember likability is all that matters according to some. It matters if people like them and I distinctly recall people didn't like Gwyneth or her demeanor in court but the facts win in the end, don't they?

I propose that whenever a woman claims sexual harassment, the trial should establish how likeable she is and go over her entire sexual history to establish whether she is a slut.

That should not happen, but because Blake and Ryan are well known it will be very hard to find jurors who do not already have an opinion of them. If I were her attorney I would try to stack the jury with senior citizens who have no clue about their films and shows. It would be the equivalent of me being asked about Zendaya. I've never seen any movie or TV show from her or her boyfriend and have no opinion except that she's pretty.

[Anonymous]

Once all the facts come out, I think Ryan Reynolds is going to be seen as the real villain in all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is playing victim after actively wrestling all types of control over the movie from the person who held the rights using the clout of her husband, and hoping this would finish him off. She and Ryan were rewriting the script nightly during the writer’s strike. She’s no victim, and if you weren’t in the “no woman could ever lie” camp, you’d likely see that. Plenty of men are bad actors, but that doesn’t make every woman a saint.

Blah blah. It won't be that hard for her to prove her case. The evidence is obvious.

No one can say you aren’t steadfast in your opinion.

And I don't even have to call anyone names in order to make a point.

That is far from true.

Please quote my name calling. It's been abundantly clear who the name callers are in here. We all see it.