The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

I’m sorry, WHAT?! You want us to trust anything Danni has to say? No.

Danny Stair is not innocent so do not believe what she say. She wanted that money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

I’m sorry, WHAT?! You want us to trust anything Danni has to say? No.

Danny Stair is not innocent so do not believe what she say. She wanted that money.

Of course no one is going to believe her.

[Anonymous]

I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

Yup, Natasha is just getting the heat now because Kane has not spoken publicly about their divorce since his radio meltdown whereas Natasha pops up every few months with vague promises to tell all. If there weren’t kids involved I’d say go ahead but it’s a crappy thing for her to do knowing her daughters are impacted by this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

+1 - there is a place for everyone to tell their story (men and women), but trashing your coparent in a forum full of strangers while your kids are still very young and you still need to coparent is NOT IT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

+1 - there is a place for everyone to tell their story (men and women), but trashing your coparent in a forum full of strangers while your kids are still very young and you still need to coparent is NOT IT

+2 y'all need stop defending Nat at every turn simply because she has a freaking vag. Most of us on this thread have a vag, yet we still can remain pretty neutral in our criticism lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

Sounds like you sit on a high throne.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

Oh reeeeeealllly now? I didn't read her book, please tell us more!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

100% this. He brought this to the public and his friends continued to say stuff here to try and make her look bad, it was pretty obvious. No one had to know the dirty details and yet here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

Natasha rents a small house, Peter has the big mansion. He has the multiple luxury cars and the nanny and maid. She lives a very middle class lifestyle. They both are addicts, she's just the only one who got help.

It'll be interesting to see if he hangs on to the mansion and luxury cars now, and why does he need a maid LOL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

And every so many months she returns to her blog to trash him.

It's always after he has done something to hurt her.

Publicly? That’s what we’re discussing.

I'm a DP but no amount of posting on her blog can ever trump him going on the radio in a major city and completely lying about things. The reach in audience is no comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

I’m sorry, WHAT?! You want us to trust anything Danni has to say? No.

Danny Stair is not innocent so do not believe what she say. She wanted that money.

What money? She can't be getting anything out of iheart or the book. And if it weren't true, couldn't she have been sued by now? Think about it, maybe there's enough evidence that he CAN'T PROVE HER WRONG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

I didn't post that but the whole 'mama nubes' thing is beyond annoying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

Yup, Natasha is just getting the heat now because Kane has not spoken publicly about their divorce since his radio meltdown whereas Natasha pops up every few months with vague promises to tell all. If there weren’t kids involved I’d say go ahead but it’s a crappy thing for her to do knowing her daughters are impacted by this.

You guys are stupid if you think her posts or anything posted here are going to impact her daughters. You really think they don't live in the reality between these 2 and see how messed up they are? It's no secret to them and they've probably seen worse than anything we'll ever read about.