The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

This whole post screams "white people with money problems" and "white suburban mommie with money problems"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a lot of respect for her for coming 'clean' about the addiction issue. It takes a lot to be public about something like that. I have to admit I don't think Natasha is innocent in all that went on but I am rooting for her in her sobriety.

Me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

She clearly isn't trying to draw traffic to her blog when she has gone silent repeatedly for long periods of time. I believe they both have addiction problems. He just has the money, power and public forum to hurt her and to hide his own issues. At least she got help and got better. He is obviously still having issues. He got fired and taken off the air for something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

I feel like she’s not going to own the impact of her addition on peter / her daughters. Trying to protect your kids from an addict can certainly lead to extreme behaviors. Not excuse any abuse - I don’t know what happened on either sides, but I would go to the end of the earth to try to keep an active addict from having my kids unsupervised

A recovering addict is not an active addict. She has been in recovery for years. Peter has not addressed his addiction. The girls being in his care is extremely scary. IHeart didn't even trust him on the air, how can he be trusted with the girls? Someone needs to investigate his household. Maybe child protective services.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does she ever truly take responsibility for anything...? Doesn't sound like it. It sounds like it's always someone's fault she does what she does. Like she's always the victim (or became an addict) because of the actions of someone else.

I you lived with him, you'd probably be a victim too. Apparently many of the women who worked with him say they were victimized too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

Natasha rents a small house, Peter has the big mansion. He has the multiple luxury cars and the nanny and maid. She lives a very middle class lifestyle. They both are addicts, she's just the only one who got help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole post screams "white people with money problems" and "white suburban mommie with money problems"

Natasha is not white. She is latina.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it any secret Natasha was addicted to pills? I feel like even her craziest supporters on here stopped denying she’d had a problem after that batsh*t crazy blog post about how she “slipped on cardboard” doing a craft (lol) cracked her head open and pretty much blacked out in front of her daughters. I’m glad she got help. It seems attention wh*rish to try to milk her story into “chapters” to draw traffic to her blog.

Just scroll back a few pages and you'll see her supporters screaming that she was never an addict and thst only Peter is an issue. At this point she is the only one admitting to be an addict while he has disclosed his OCD.

He is definitely an addict himself. Read Dani's book. He was repeatedly high on the job. He has done crazy stuff on ambien.

I’m sorry, WHAT?! You want us to trust anything Danni has to say? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

And every so many months she returns to her blog to trash him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

And every so many months she returns to her blog to trash him.

It's always after he has done something to hurt her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those poor girls. Their friends and their mommas and daddies have to read this.

He want on the air to trash their mother. He started this whole public mess.

And every so many months she returns to her blog to trash him.

It's always after he has done something to hurt her.

Publicly? That’s what we’re discussing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole post screams "white people with money problems" and "white suburban mommie with money problems"

Natasha is not white. She is latina.

You are wrong. She is a strong Latin Woman. I don't know about her biological dad, thou.