The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

+1 - there is a place for everyone to tell their story (men and women), but trashing your coparent in a forum full of strangers while your kids are still very young and you still need to coparent is NOT IT

+2 y'all need stop defending Nat at every turn simply because she has a freaking vag. Most of us on this thread have a vag, yet we still can remain pretty neutral in our criticism lol

You must not be familiar with Pete, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

You must be a MAN. Strong women intimidate you don't they.

I’m a woman who doesn’t respect hiding behind feminism when really you just want to trash your ex at the expense of your children. But go off mama nubes

I didn't post that but the whole 'mama nubes' thing is beyond annoying.

Not previous poster but Natasha used to be on this thread and even posted defending herself in the third person (eek) so it’s not too far fetched to think her mother is on as well.

[Anonymous]

Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

Yup, Natasha is just getting the heat now because Kane has not spoken publicly about their divorce since his radio meltdown whereas Natasha pops up every few months with vague promises to tell all. If there weren’t kids involved I’d say go ahead but it’s a crappy thing for her to do knowing her daughters are impacted by this.

You guys are stupid if you think her posts or anything posted here are going to impact her daughters. You really think they don't live in the reality between these 2 and see how messed up they are? It's no secret to them and they've probably seen worse than anything we'll ever read about.

Are you kidding? It’s not about what their daughters know. It’s about what their friends, their friends’ parents and anybody who cares to google it will know on top of what’s already out there. It’s rough enough being a girl at their age. Add in that their mother is actively blogging talking sh*t about their dad and their classmates will have ammo to torture them for years. Tween and teen girls can be vicious and if you think the girls won’t be paying in one way or another for their mom’s decision to publicize more details of her divorce then you’re the idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find this whole back and forth so bizarre - can’t it be truth that she was an active addict who wasn’t able to care safely for her kids and still depends on men and drama AND he’s a mean bully who used his public platform to trash her AND they’re both now unable to get their heads out of their asses to effectively co-parent and raise their kids? They both seem horribly childish and pathetic from where I sit

Yup, Natasha is just getting the heat now because Kane has not spoken publicly about their divorce since his radio meltdown whereas Natasha pops up every few months with vague promises to tell all. If there weren’t kids involved I’d say go ahead but it’s a crappy thing for her to do knowing her daughters are impacted by this.

You guys are stupid if you think her posts or anything posted here are going to impact her daughters. You really think they don't live in the reality between these 2 and see how messed up they are? It's no secret to them and they've probably seen worse than anything we'll ever read about.

Are you kidding? It’s not about what their daughters know. It’s about what their friends, their friends’ parents and anybody who cares to google it will know on top of what’s already out there. It’s rough enough being a girl at their age. Add in that their mother is actively blogging talking sh*t about their dad and their classmates will have ammo to torture them for years. Tween and teen girls can be vicious and if you think the girls won’t be paying in one way or another for their mom’s decision to publicize more details of her divorce then you’re the idiot.

Their father went on a syndicated radio show and said all kinds of things about their mother. He was widely publicized for a domestic assault arrest (yes I know it was "dismissed"). Everyone in MoCo and all of this listening areas knows all about this so let's not act like her silly blog is a big reveal to their friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

[Anonymous]

Natasha’s post eludes to parental alienation and if that’s true, then that is what is damaging to the girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

Why do you keep deflecting back to Peter when we are talking about Natasha? "What about Peter?" "How about Peter admitting his faults?" etc.

You sound like Natasha. WE ARE DISCUSSING NATASHA'S own words, not Peter.

[Anonymous]

Lol where are all the posters who spent pages on pages saying Natasha was not abusing pills and Kane was the one “slurring” on the radio? Now it’s pivoted to “well okay she was an addict but he might have been one too” like WHAT??

And to whoever said everything is already out there that will hurt his daughters, no it’s not because Natasha is planning on publishing chapters of new information that no one has publicly known before. So she is choosing to share “her truth” rather than triage the damage already done to her daughters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

Why do you keep deflecting back to Peter when we are talking about Natasha? "What about Peter?" "How about Peter admitting his faults?" etc.

You sound like Natasha. WE ARE DISCUSSING NATASHA'S own words, not Peter.

Uh, this is "the kane show discussion thread"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lol where are all the posters who spent pages on pages saying Natasha was not abusing pills and Kane was the one “slurring” on the radio? Now it’s pivoted to “well okay she was an addict but he might have been one too” like WHAT??

And to whoever said everything is already out there that will hurt his daughters, no it’s not because Natasha is planning on publishing chapters of new information that no one has publicly known before. So she is choosing to share “her truth” rather than triage the damage already done to her daughters.

It can't get much worse than the publications of daddy's arrest for domestic violence and books written about him being a sexist racist abusive man

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He might have taken a mutually agreed upon leave of absence.

If that is the case they simply would have said that and not changed the name of the show.

[Anonymous]

BACK TO THE MAIN TOPIC

who is taking over the morning show on 99.5??

Rumors flying!! Elvis? The "Intern John" show? Return of Danni Starr? Toby Knapp? Natasha?

[Anonymous]

Why isn’t this a thread for The replacements show?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol where are all the posters who spent pages on pages saying Natasha was not abusing pills and Kane was the one “slurring” on the radio? Now it’s pivoted to “well okay she was an addict but he might have been one too” like WHAT??

And to whoever said everything is already out there that will hurt his daughters, no it’s not because Natasha is planning on publishing chapters of new information that no one has publicly known before. So she is choosing to share “her truth” rather than triage the damage already done to her daughters.

It can't get much worse than the publications of daddy's arrest for domestic violence and books written about him being a sexist racist abusive man

Um that wasn’t a book. That was a Microsoft word document passed off as a book because with Amazon anyone can be an author.