Spirit Coach

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Dorrance wasn’t canceled, but that doesn’t mean we should forget or simply excuse what he did because he didn’t lose his job as ranting implied.

What has he done that has you upset?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Dorrance wasn’t canceled, but that doesn’t mean we should forget or simply excuse what he did because he didn’t lose his job as ranting implied.

What has he done that has you upset?

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1998-08-26-9808260023-story.html

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/01/15/north-carolina-and-coach-settle-sexual-harassment-suit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Dorrance wasn’t canceled, but that doesn’t mean we should forget or simply excuse what he did because he didn’t lose his job as ranting implied.

What has he done that has you upset?

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1998-08-26-9808260023-story.html

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/01/15/north-carolina-and-coach-settle-sexual-harassment-suit

So an article from 1998 has your panties in a twist?

[Anonymous]

Idiots - 1998 article that basically called out for him saying things at the time that were commonplace. I don’t agree with what was said - if he said them to begin with - but give me a break, there is no reason to hold it over him 23 years later.

Countless players love the man - just turn to Mia Hamm, and countless other players of national stature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Nah. We've got social justice to combat and that's more important than that. Look at Angel City's hiring. Had to hire a woman coach. Thought of getting the assistant off the best club in the league was non-starter because he was a man. Vlato is going to be in the same situation soon if he doesn't keep the train rolling. It's sad but that's where we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Nah. We've got social justice to combat and that's more important than that. Look at Angel City's hiring. Had to hire a woman coach. Thought of getting the assistant off the best club in the league was non-starter because he was a man. Vlato is going to be in the same situation soon if he doesn't keep the train rolling. It's sad but that's where we are.

It's really cute how you automatically assume a female coach is the also-ran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These recent posts are a big part of what's wrong with American sports these days. Someone makes a mistake, and let's cancel them. No one is allowed to learn from mistakes? Once you make a mistake you're done - finished. Good bye.

Let's not hire a white male because they are a white male....let's go get a <fill in the blank> instead. What happened to finding the best candidate (regardless of their race/sex/etc.)?

Nah. We've got social justice to combat and that's more important than that. Look at Angel City's hiring. Had to hire a woman coach. Thought of getting the assistant off the best club in the league was non-starter because he was a man. Vlato is going to be in the same situation soon if he doesn't keep the train rolling. It's sad but that's where we are.

What?!!?!?!? A woman head coach, coaching a women run and women owned team in a women's league?? Are there any opportunities for white men anymore?

[Anonymous]

So, are we still sure that the problem is whiny WOC newcomers to the team?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/30/washington-spirit-owners-steve-baldwin/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, are we still sure that the problem is whiny WOC newcomers to the team?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/30/washington-spirit-owners-steve-baldwin/

Since you’re posing the question..why don’t you tell us your analysis.

[Anonymous]

What's the saying..."a fish rots from the head down."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's the saying..."a fish rots from the head down."

That’s your analysis of the article?

[Anonymous]

Welcome to soccer in Wokemerica, where the wokemorons are in charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, are we still sure that the problem is whiny WOC newcomers to the team?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/30/washington-spirit-owners-steve-baldwin/

Since you’re posing the question..why don’t you tell us your analysis.

My analysis is that management appears to be dysfunctional on multiple levels and has been for years.

They opted not to do due diligence on Burke and when concerns were brought to their attention anyway, chose to ignore them.

This is a business problem, but let's pretend it's about "wokeness."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, are we still sure that the problem is whiny WOC newcomers to the team?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/30/washington-spirit-owners-steve-baldwin/

Since you’re posing the question..why don’t you tell us your analysis.

My analysis is that management appears to be dysfunctional on multiple levels and has been for years.

They opted not to do due diligence on Burke and when concerns were brought to their attention anyway, chose to ignore them.

This is a business problem, but let's pretend it's about "wokeness."

Be objective. Is that all you took from the article?

I’m not saying you’re wrong. But there seems to be more in play

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, are we still sure that the problem is whiny WOC newcomers to the team?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/30/washington-spirit-owners-steve-baldwin/

Since you’re posing the question..why don’t you tell us your analysis.

My analysis is that management appears to be dysfunctional on multiple levels and has been for years.

They opted not to do due diligence on Burke and when concerns were brought to their attention anyway, chose to ignore them.

This is a business problem, but let's pretend it's about "wokeness."

Be objective. Is that all you took from the article?

I’m not saying you’re wrong. But there seems to be more in play

Think the bolded pretty much covers that.

But having worked at another organization that chose to overlook negative input during the hiring process, I've seen it end badly, and that's exactly what happened here.