Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

She's not a journalist. She's a behavioral scientist and researcher. Note the PhD and her Twitter bio.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

She's not a journalist. She's a behavioral scientist and researcher. Note the PhD and her Twitter bio.

Well, she wrote a representative piece/Twitter screed on right-aligned groups, which is apparently the minimum qualification for being a journalist, so objectively speaking (of course) she is a journalist, and he isn't.
/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

She's not a journalist. She's a behavioral scientist and researcher. Note the PhD and her Twitter bio.

Well, she wrote a representative piece/Twitter screed on right-aligned groups, which is apparently the minimum qualification for being a journalist, so objectively speaking (of course) she is a journalist, and he isn't.
/s

Neither of them are journalists.

Where are you coming up with these wacky ideas?

She is a researcher. He is a propagandist.

Just because someone posts something on twitter doesn't make them a journalist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

[Anonymous]

Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

She's not a journalist. She's a behavioral scientist and researcher. Note the PhD and her Twitter bio.

Well, she wrote a representative piece/Twitter screed on right-aligned groups, which is apparently the minimum qualification for being a journalist, so objectively speaking (of course) she is a journalist, and he isn't.
/s

Neither of them are journalists.

Where are you coming up with these wacky ideas?

She is a researcher. He is a propagandist.

Just because someone posts something on twitter doesn't make them a journalist.

1) The left has ZERO sense of humor or self-awareness.
2) Ngo is LITERALLY a journalist, as in, he is an editor and contributor for the Post-Millenial.
3) Funny how you think my sarcasm is "wacky," even though it's pretty much what lefties on this site are actually saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

Nobody cares who you are personally. The issue here is left-wing violence being excused/ignored/minimized or whatever word you want to use for something other than using police and prosecutors to enforce laws against rioting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.

Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.

You moron. There is no antifa and I'm no terrorist you fool. Dear lord you are brain damaged.

What does ANTIFA mean? The vast majority of people in this country are against facism. You aren't intelligent enough to understand that the whole concept was part of the plan to MAKE FACISM ACCEPTABLE SO THE ORANGE IDIOT COULD TAKE OVER OUR COUNTRY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

You don't understand many things including the meaning of the term gaslighting. Your party is built upon lies. Your lies and weak attempts to pass this guy off as a journalist will fail here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of my favorite Antifa videos is when one of them went up close (but out of arm’s reach) to Dan Bongino and shouted “We’re going to rape your wife”. Bongino started towards him saying “what did you say?” And the Antifa guy turned tail and ran towards….wait for it….the police.

So typical. What cowards.

As if any of those Antifa weenies could get it up for a woman

You are disgusting. Let me guess you look like one of those creeps who attacked the capital. How many teeth are you missing. I bet you smell bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

Nobody cares who you are personally. The issue here is left-wing violence being excused/ignored/minimized or whatever word you want to use for something other than using police and prosecutors to enforce laws against rioting.

"Nobody cares about you personally" - funny to try and claim that after posters (probably including yourself) have repeatedly accused the rest of us of literally being Antifa members along with a host of other bogus strawmen about what you think we personally are.

Also, WHERE exactly in this thread did anyone "excused/ignored/minimized" violence? That didn't happen.

When you can't argue reality and stay on point you just make your own strawmen up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
If you read anything about what some countries have done to try to destabilize other countries, near the top of the list is what we have going on here. The republicans know this. Why do they want to destroy our country? They aren't fighting for anything they believe in. They just want to bring down everything.

They have been trying to bring the country down on multiple fronts for decades. They have wanted to call a Constitutional Convention, they have installed judges friendly to their whackjob theories at all levels of our judiciary, they have worked with foreign countries to weaken the US, they basically own the corporate media (and have convinced people that the corporate media is somehow leftist, despite zero evidence), they have destabilized cities as best as they can (umbrella man was the tip of the iceberg).

They think they can re-make this country into a fascist white supremacist nation in which brown men are second class citizens or slaves and women aren’t citizens at all.

And the cons on this thread applaud it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

LMAO! I just pulled up the Post Millennial - chock full of over-the-top screeching right-wing trope headlines about Wuhan lab, transgender, woke politics yadda yadda yadda. NOT serious journalism. Reads like the National Enquirer or a political version of The Onion. Move over, Bat Boy... Andy Ngo is here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.