Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

You don't understand many things including the meaning of the term gaslighting. Your party is built upon lies. Your lies and weak attempts to pass this guy off as a journalist will fail here.

Gaslighting is when someone is literally a journalist and you claim that's a lie because the person openly aligns with the right, ignore that you've presented no evidence to support your own claims, and then tell other people they don't know the meaning of term gaslighting, as if a gaslighter could even be relied on to honestly discuss their own gaslighting.

If you weren't a gaslighter, you would not have answered this way. Gaslighters don't know how else to respond though, so once caught, they just keep doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.

So is Salon, Intercept, Vox, Jacobin etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

She's not a journalist. She's a behavioral scientist and researcher. Note the PhD and her Twitter bio.

Well her Linked In bio says:

Journalist - Freelance (self employed)
Jun 2016-Present

Freelance journalist and Editor... featured in Playboy, National Interest, Arc Digital, Byline Times, and The Independent..

She also site jobs with a Canadian publication and a news reporter for The American Independent

Sounds a "journalistic" to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.

So is Salon, Intercept, Vox, Jacobin etc.

And Netflix --

[Anonymous]

How is a self-employed, free-lance journalist different from a blogger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

"Why so many police stops of vehicles."

Oh, I don't know -- to stop the driver who just ran over your grandmother.
To stop the driver who just highjacked the car with a mother and baby in it
To stop the driver who just robbed a convenience store and shot a cleark
To stop the driver who was weaving in and out of traffic and jeopardizing other drivers
To stop the driver who blew past a stopped school bus as children were leaving the bus
To stop the driver who ran through a red light and smashed into your car


"If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?"

Dunno, but the Democrats have been addressing these problems since the reign of Franklin Roosevelt. Why can't you get it right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.

Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.

You moron. There is no antifa and I'm no terrorist you fool. Dear lord you are brain damaged.

What does ANTIFA mean? The vast majority of people in this country are against facism. You aren't intelligent enough to understand that the whole concept was part of the plan to MAKE FACISM ACCEPTABLE SO THE ORANGE IDIOT COULD TAKE OVER OUR COUNTRY.

Speaking of morons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is a self-employed, free-lance journalist different from a blogger?

Journalist = person who posts news or commentary I like.
Blogger, propangandist, liar = person who posts news or commentary I don't like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

Nobody cares who you are personally. The issue here is left-wing violence being excused/ignored/minimized or whatever word you want to use for something other than using police and prosecutors to enforce laws against rioting.

You are so much fun. You who supposedly back the blue until you don't get your way...

I'm one of those people who know antifa is a made-up boogeman your klan needs. A pearl clutching poster above wandered in to this site from gawd knows what butt scratch town and started the "dangerous antifa is everywhere" rallying cry for the uneducated terrorists who have somehow found their way here. What I will tell you is I, like most of the posters here, am not violent, don't brawl and would never wear a t shirt that proudly proclaims my need to open a can of "whoop ass". You, on the other hand...

Statistics also tell me, you probably have an extensive history of entanglements with law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.

So is Salon, Intercept, Vox, Jacobin etc.

And Netflix --

The comparison is so inaccurate but this is what your band of treasonous liars have to do. Reality shows you fail. Don't you need to go off and send more $ to that orange buffoon who will be in jail soon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is a self-employed, free-lance journalist different from a blogger?

Journalist = person who posts news or commentary I like.
Blogger, propangandist, liar = person who posts news or commentary I don't like.

False analogy.

Bottom line is that it is not acceptable to call someone a journalist when they literally turn their cameras off and stop recording the second their own side is the one engaging in the rioting, violence and destruction. And that is exactly what Ngo has done with the Proud Boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.

It's astounding that the right wing will whine about "Fake News MSM" yet turn to EVEN FAKER "news" like Post Millennial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Law and order is necessary, but it has also been used as a smoke screen for racist behavior. People on the left tend to ignore or minimize the need for enforcing law (the word 'force' is in there because it's a necessary component.) People on the right tend to ignore or minimize the racist acts committed in the name of enforcing the law.

I'm a "leftist" who's been accused of being "Antifa" and an "anarchist" in this thread, yet I am not affiliated with Antifa and am not at all an anarchist. I am not against law and order and I don't think most Americans are. But we ARE in favor of police reforms to improve oversight and accountability when police abuses happen.

Also, enforce does not have to mean violence either. For example, why so many police stops of vehicles? Speeding or a headlight out? Mail them a ticket with a warning for first offense and a ticket for second. In this day and age most of that crap can and should just be automated. Police should be focusing first and foremost on actual violent crime. Not hassling some guy on the street for selling loose cigarettes, that should be all the way down at the bottom of the list. The other place where we go wrong in this country is crime prevention. Looking at the causes of why crime happens in the first place. It's often related to economics, lack of opportunity, broken systems, oppression and other kinds of dysfunction, along with substance abuse, mental health and so on. If we're so concerned about crime why don't we bother addressing any of the causes?

Nobody cares who you are personally. The issue here is left-wing violence being excused/ignored/minimized or whatever word you want to use for something other than using police and prosecutors to enforce laws against rioting.

You are so much fun. You who supposedly back the blue until you don't get your way...

I'm one of those people who know antifa is a made-up boogeman your klan needs. A pearl clutching poster above wandered in to this site from gawd knows what butt scratch town and started the "dangerous antifa is everywhere" rallying cry for the uneducated terrorists who have somehow found their way here. What I will tell you is I, like most of the posters here, am not violent, don't brawl and would never wear a t shirt that proudly proclaims my need to open a can of "whoop ass". You, on the other hand...

Statistics also tell me, you probably have an extensive history of entanglements with law enforcement.

It's so weird you made up an entire completely false narrative about me, yet expect everyone to believe everything you have to say. It's even weirder that there are millions of people like you, all believing in their own superiority over everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a journalist. He is the editor-at-large of The Post Millennial.

You may not agree with him, but he is a journalist.

He also documents the arrests of those in Portland associated with Antifa. They don't like him for doing that.

The Post Millenial is 3 bloggers in their Canadian basement.

It's astounding that the right wing will whine about "Fake News MSM" yet turn to EVEN FAKER "news" like Post Millennial.

It's weird that you think Jacobin has journalists and Post Millenial doesn't. Even weirder you don't know what it means to call yourself a Jacobin.