Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.

Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.

Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.

I reported the thread. Can others PLEASE do the same.

+1

+100
It’s astonishing to see the blatant antifa apologists crawling out of their holes. At least they’re telling us (yet again) who they really are.

You guys are scary. You’re right-wingers, no one here is in Antifa or apologizing. It’s this bizarre, ineffectual trolling. Very creepy. Get your bs in now, as hopefully this entire thread will go away.

I also hope the kids can ban the guy who starts replied with “And,” as he admitted trolling on this thread, and that he is essentially always here. Get rid of this crap.

If this thread should be reported, it's for the RW trolling and gaslighting going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/

Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.

Unfounded? Clearly you did not read the article. It lays out quite a bit of specific detail - for example, that the way she found out she was on an Atomwaffen "kill list" was because she was contacted by law enforcement.

Nobody denied she was on this list. But how does she know it was not because of her other run-ins with neo-Nazis before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Gorcenski

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/

Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.

Unfounded? Clearly you did not read the article. It lays out quite a bit of specific detail - for example, that the way she found out she was on an Atomwaffen "kill list" was because she was contacted by law enforcement.

Nobody denied she was on this list. But how does she know it was not because of her other run-ins with neo-Nazis before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Gorcenski

Before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo?
You're probably the only person here who didn't hear of Andy Ngo until his book came out.
The rest of us have been aware of him for several years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/

Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.

Unfounded? Clearly you did not read the article. It lays out quite a bit of specific detail - for example, that the way she found out she was on an Atomwaffen "kill list" was because she was contacted by law enforcement.

Nobody denied she was on this list. But how does she know it was not because of her other run-ins with neo-Nazis before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Gorcenski

Before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo?
You're probably the only person here who didn't hear of Andy Ngo until his book came out.
The rest of us have been aware of him for several years.

It's odd how the left can accuse others of paying too much attention to a minor figure nobody cares about, expect others to have heard about the same person whenever they did, assume an entire forum of strangers all know the same thing, and make up a fact about one of the strangers at the same time.

[Anonymous]

This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/

Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.

Unfounded? Clearly you did not read the article. It lays out quite a bit of specific detail - for example, that the way she found out she was on an Atomwaffen "kill list" was because she was contacted by law enforcement.

Nobody denied she was on this list. But how does she know it was not because of her other run-ins with neo-Nazis before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Gorcenski

Before anyone ever heard of Andy Ngo?
You're probably the only person here who didn't hear of Andy Ngo until his book came out.
The rest of us have been aware of him for several years.

Yep. Those of us on Twitter have known about Andy Ngo for years. Amazing how some people think their own ignorance is somehow reflective of everyone else's knowledge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t trust Ngo. He’s not a journalist - he’s a bigot who doesn’t do any representative pieces (Twitter screeds) on the Proud Boys or aligned groups like the Oathkeepers.

Caroline Orr Bueno Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University is also a freelance journalist who writes for Playboy. So she's a journalist and he isn't?

Caroline Orr - Member
Picture of Caroline Orr
Caroline Orr
DOCTORAL STUDENT/RESEARCH ASSISTANT
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY
Email Caroline Orr
About Myself:
I am currently working on my PhD in Social and Behavioral Health at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) in Richmond, VA. Prior to enrolling at VCU, I completed my undergraduate degree in Psychology and then went on to get my M.A. in Health Education and Promotion and my M.S. in Psychology.
I have a variety of research interests, but my main focal areas include sociopolitical determinants of health, racial health disparities, social stigma, and women's health issues- particularly pertaining to maternal and child health, reproductive health, and violence against women.

[Anonymous]

It's funny how they want to claim Andy Ngo is "a nobody that noone has ever heard of" when he's been published in places like the Wall Street Journal. He has a net worth in the millions. Because he's being funded by big dark money interests to push a narrative. Because he's getting a lot of big money help to get elevated to places like publishing in WSJ.

Most of the other indie journalists also covering protests (but without the Ngo hyperbole) are typically working side jobs to pay their rent.

[Anonymous]

Citing Ngo is like citing Project Veritas. When they have a clear agenda, you can’t believe what they say. It’s as simple as that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"

Why do you continue to defend Antifa/anarchists? Not one of you has condemned the violence, rioting, and destruction they cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"

Why do you continue to defend Antifa/anarchists? Not one of you has condemned the violence, rioting, and destruction they cause.

Because the left can do no wrong, ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"

Why do you continue to defend Antifa/anarchists? Not one of you has condemned the violence, rioting, and destruction they cause.

LMAO you are delusional. Where has anyone here defended Antifa violence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"

Why do you continue to defend Antifa/anarchists? Not one of you has condemned the violence, rioting, and destruction they cause.

LMAO you are delusional. Where has anyone here defended Antifa violence?

Right. You don't defend them, you just attack anyone who thinks it's a problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"

Why do you continue to defend Antifa/anarchists? Not one of you has condemned the violence, rioting, and destruction they cause.

LMAO you are delusional. Where has anyone here defended Antifa violence?

LOL they actually seem to think they are here doing battle with "Antifa..." Along with the "commies" or whatever else
Got a song to dedicate...