Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor is gorgeous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Motherhood hasn’t made her any softer or relatable....just bitchy.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-told-off-meghan-markles-17718033?utm_source=mirror_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Royalnews5&utm_campaign=royals_newsletter

Funny - pregnancy didn't curb the tabloid media's taste for her blood and now motherhood hasn't either.

People will do anything to get close to her even when she's just watching a game.

This is who her security talked. He was literally in her face.

Yeah, he might have thought he wasn't bothering anyone by taking his selfie in front of a closed area. Little did he know. Oops.

He was taking pictures of her. Even the Indian women are turned around and looking at him like WTF dude? So rude.

He might have been sneaking his way into taking pictures of her by taking selfies of himself at Wimbledon first. But he hadn't gotten there yet. He was just taking pics of himself.

[Anonymous]

He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

He was taking pics of himself.

Poor Meghan. He wasn't even taking pics of her, illicit or otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

Do you think you might be a little toooo engrossed with Meghan markle? How do you have all these pics? Do you spend your day stalking her? Maybe you are in fact that photog?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

He was taking pics of himself.

Poor Meghan. He wasn't even taking pics of her, illicit or otherwise.

Pictures of himself with a phone directed straight at the most famous woman in the world while his profile was pointed AWAY from the court where the game was being played?

Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

Do you think you might be a little toooo engrossed with Meghan markle? How do you have all these pics? Do you spend your day stalking her? Maybe you are in fact that photog?

If I was my equipment is awesome.

[Anonymous]

The selfie was a pretense, he was going for the Meghan-shot. It's an odd angle for a selfie - not head-on full court nor a shot that would include Serena.

[Anonymous]

Security did its job. He got too close to her, taking pics or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was behind a rail- not in her face- and he must have had a ticket to sit there

Nope. His camera was pointed directly at her - so in her face is accurate. And he didn't have a ticket to sit there because the bleachers surrounding Meghan + her entire section were empty on purpose.

He targeted her by crossing an empty stairwell to get to where the Indian family were sitting.

He was taking pics of himself.

Poor Meghan. He wasn't even taking pics of her, illicit or otherwise.

Pictures of himself with a phone directed straight at the most famous woman in the world while his profile was pointed AWAY from the court where the game was being played?

Please.

He wasn’t. You can zoom in and see he was taking a selfie with the game behind him.

And she is far from the most famous woman in the world.

[Anonymous]

If she's not the most famous yet, she's getting there.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she's not the most famous yet, she's getting there.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

Please....

Dream on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she's not the most famous yet, she's getting there.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

Please....

Dream on.

Okay, what's your evidence to the contrary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she's not the most famous yet, she's getting there.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

Please....

Dream on.

Okay, what's your evidence to the contrary?

New poster but here’s my evidence. She’s new- that’s why people are interested in her, criticize her, write articles about her. Just like they did with Diana and Kate. She’s pushing 40 and once she’s done having kids she’ll be like fergie- older and not interesting. Around Kate’s wedding the media mania about her was insane

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she's not the most famous yet, she's getting there.

https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/the-10-most-googled-people-of-2018-whod-you-look-up.html

Please....

Dream on.

Okay, what's your evidence to the contrary?

New poster but here’s my evidence. She’s new- that’s why people are interested in her, criticize her, write articles about her. Just like they did with Diana and Kate. She’s pushing 40 and once she’s done having kids she’ll be like fergie- older and not interesting. Around Kate’s wedding the media mania about her was insane

LOL

I think people have been saying she's 'new' since 2017. You know she was also well-known BEFORE she met Prince Harry right?

Anyway Diana has yearly television programs, books and memorials to her and she's been dead for 25 years. If anything, people are losing interest in Kate and her kids. While Meghan's going from strength to strength.

P.S. - We all wish Fergie would go away. Unfortunately Andrew has had his cheating/bribing ex-wife living with him for the past decade. Interesting that no one is crying foul about THAT taxpayer expense though.