It's now easier to perform an abortion in the state of New York than to legally apply a tattoo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s still a second degree felony to destroy a turtle egg.

Priorities are clear.

It’s a felony in NY to possess a firearm magazine that can hold 11 bullets.

But killing a unborn baby, nearly full term, that could live if it were delivered, simply “because I don’t wanna have this baby”, is perfectly legal.


It’s absolutely mind bending.

Name a single instance of a nearly full-term viable, healthy baby in the womb of a healthy woman with no medical emergency was aborted.

+1

I’d like to hear an example of this too. Otherwise it’s just fear-mongering. SOP for the GOP.

I doubt women who abort their healthy babies would want their names made available to the public. Would you?

Anyone?

Name one New York doctor who would abort a healthy full-term baby or abort a healthy late-term baby on a woman not experiencing a medical emergency. Oh you can't, because the New York law allows abortions after 24 weeks only when a fetus is not viable (i.e. the opposite of healthy) or when necessary to protect the life of the mother.

Not anymore. Not with the new law.

You could literally elect to abort a healthy full term fetus while having delivery contractions.


This what the women of New York want. They want to be able to make that decision, if they so choose. They elected the people that wrote this law, which reflects their wishes.


Just accept it.

Uh. You should go check your facts. You are dead wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

Right? And she was talking to her young employee about it. I’m so sure this happened /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

Why they would not talk about it? If they are so proud that they have control of their body, what to be ashamed of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

Why they would not talk about it? If they are so proud that they have control of their body, what to be ashamed of?

What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

Hey, you hateful Liberal, you have no clue what different people choose to talk about.

[Anonymous]

Still waiting for a prolifer to explain why NY's abortion law is so much worse than WV, MS, and AK full term abortion laws.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My daughter worked for a Liberal female lobbyist who three abortions as a grown adult.

Because people are always talking about the abortions they had.

Why they would not talk about it? If they are so proud that they have control of their body, what to be ashamed of?

What is wrong with you?

Nothing wrong with me. But I assume if you fought for this cause, you had a freedom to choose what to do with your body after you managed to get pregnant, you exercised that right: would you be very proud of yourself and tell everyone that you are a strong independent woman who does whatever she want with her body?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s still a second degree felony to destroy a turtle egg.

Priorities are clear.

It’s a felony in NY to possess a firearm magazine that can hold 11 bullets.

But killing a unborn baby, nearly full term, that could live if it were delivered, simply “because I don’t wanna have this baby”, is perfectly legal.


It’s absolutely mind bending.

Name a single instance of a nearly full-term viable, healthy baby in the womb of a healthy woman with no medical emergency was aborted.

+1

I’d like to hear an example of this too. Otherwise it’s just fear-mongering. SOP for the GOP.

I doubt women who abort their healthy babies would want their names made available to the public. Would you?

Anyone?

Name one New York doctor who would abort a healthy full-term baby or abort a healthy late-term baby on a woman not experiencing a medical emergency. Oh you can't, because the New York law allows abortions after 24 weeks only when a fetus is not viable (i.e. the opposite of healthy) or when necessary to protect the life of the mother.

Not anymore. Not with the new law.

You could literally elect to abort a healthy full term fetus while having delivery contractions.


This what the women of New York want. They want to be able to make that decision, if they so choose. They elected the people that wrote this law, which reflects their wishes.


Just accept it.

When you have to lie to make a point, that tells us you have nothing solid backing up your argument.

The new law, verbatim from the bill:

Section 2 of the bill creates a new Article 25-A of the Public Health Law (PHL), which states that an abortion May be performed by a licensed, certified, or authorized practitioner within 24 weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or at any time when necessary to protect a patient's life or health.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2017/s2796

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for a prolifer to explain why NY's abortion law is so much worse than WV, MS, and AK full term abortion laws.....

ms has the toughest abortion laws in the country. did you mean another state?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunate how often abortion gets used as BC.

How often are you referring to, exactly? Who are these women you know using abortion as birth control?

It amazes me how people who probably have never been in the position to even be pregnant have such black and white views on what women who are getting abortions are doing and why they are doing it.

I grew up UMC, as did my group of friends.

I can name four off the bat who had anywhere from 1-3 abortions in their early 20s. All four are college-educated, self-sufficient women.

There really was no excuse for these abortions. They were careless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for a prolifer to explain why NY's abortion law is so much worse than WV, MS, and AK full term abortion laws.....

ms has the toughest abortion laws in the country. did you mean another state?

a comparison
https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for a prolifer to explain why NY's abortion law is so much worse than WV, MS, and AK full term abortion laws.....

ms has the toughest abortion laws in the country. did you mean another state?

a comparison
https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws

In MS, abortions after 15 weeks are banned. I don't need to click on anything. Reply please. If not, I'll assume someone made a mistake. No big deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunate how often abortion gets used as BC.

How often are you referring to, exactly? Who are these women you know using abortion as birth control?

It amazes me how people who probably have never been in the position to even be pregnant have such black and white views on what women who are getting abortions are doing and why they are doing it.

I grew up UMC, as did my group of friends.

I can name four off the bat who had anywhere from 1-3 abortions in their early 20s. All four are college-educated, self-sufficient women.

There really was no excuse for these abortions. They were careless.

So you think they should have been forced to have those babies then?

[Anonymous]

I'd be nice if more women allowed their unwanted babies to be adopted by one of the countless couples who are infertile.