Husband confessed to killing pregnant wife and their two daughters.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Have we started casting the Lifetime movie, yet? Or too soon?

I think he should be played by Timothy Olyphant.

I vote for Joel Kinnaman.


I see your Joel Kinneman and raise you a Bradley Cooper.


No, one of the Chris's
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Have we started casting the Lifetime movie, yet? Or too soon?

I think he should be played by Timothy Olyphant.

I vote for Joel Kinnaman.


I see your Joel Kinneman and raise you a Bradley Cooper.


No, one of the Chris's


Bradley Cooper and the Chris' don't do Lifetime movies. So we should stick with more C-list actors like Olyphant and Kinnaman.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Have we started casting the Lifetime movie, yet? Or too soon?

I think he should be played by Timothy Olyphant.

I vote for Joel Kinnaman.


I see your Joel Kinneman and raise you a Bradley Cooper.


No, one of the Chris's


Bradley Cooper and the Chris' don't do Lifetime movies. So we should stick with more C-list actors like Olyphant and Kinnaman.


I hadn't even thought of that. You are absolutely right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).


After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.


As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.


Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.


It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.


Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.


I agree, sadly.

However, I think he might have killed the girls this weekend. Perhaps the 4 year old first. A two year old could hardly understand what was happening or get away. He probably killed the little one next. Then mom when she came home. Several ways that don’t involve blood. If not asphyxiation, poisoning. Put the dead kids in bed, dim the lights, tell mom not to wake them, but here’s a nice cup of tea to relax you.


Or while they were taking a bath.


I was thinking that the two girls could have been killed in a bath. Or there was some sort of accident and both kids died while mom was away. Mom comes home and he kills her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).


After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.


As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.


Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.


It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.


Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.


I agree, sadly.

However, I think he might have killed the girls this weekend. Perhaps the 4 year old first. A two year old could hardly understand what was happening or get away. He probably killed the little one next. Then mom when she came home. Several ways that don’t involve blood. If not asphyxiation, poisoning. Put the dead kids in bed, dim the lights, tell mom not to wake them, but here’s a nice cup of tea to relax you.


Or while they were taking a bath.


I was thinking that the two girls could have been killed in a bath. Or there was some sort of accident and both kids died while mom was away. Mom comes home and he kills her.

If he did it earlier he could have locked them in the car and left the engine running inside the closed garage. In fact I hope this is how they spent their final moments, peaceful, unafraid and unaware that daddy could hurt them.

And that is one of the preferred methods of family killers, along with strangulation.
Anonymous
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.

This is so confusing. Why was a guy who works at a petroleum facility making YouTube videos about relationships? I think part of the intrigue here is that both of them were/are total bullshit artists.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.

This is so confusing. Why was a guy who works at a petroleum facility making YouTube videos about relationships? I think part of the intrigue here is that both of them were/are total bullshit artists.


“Published on Apr 22, 2012
My speech for communication class”
Anonymous
For him to accuse his wife of strangling their daughters makes him a real piece of work. And he lied so easily to the news person who interviewed him. Cold, callous, unfeeling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.


He checked out long before this illiterate video. I hope he BURNS in hell.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.


He checked out long before this illiterate video. I hope he BURNS in hell.


Yes horrible monster. His gf's name is already out, appears she is also married.

She deserves the mess she is in for her part in the destruction of this family. On the upside Chris is going to get his dance card punched frequently in prison.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Or maybe she came back from her trip and he told her he was leaving the family for the other woman. She had a psychotic break and killed the kids to punish him. There are parents (of both genders) who have done this to inflict the ultimate revenge upon a despised spouse.
It's interesting that his lawyer asked for the kids' necks to be focused on in the autopsy. Why would they ask this unless they know that her DNA would be on their necks and the indentations/bruises from strangulation would match her hand/finger size.
UGH.
We have no way of knowing if they were both psychopaths or just him.
What we do know is that nothing she posted about on social media matched reality: their marriage, him, their finances---they were all a farce. For all we know she wasn't the doting mother and innocent victim either.


She is dead, you asshole. She is the victim, not him. He's trying to throw his guilt into question by blaming her for the kids' deaths. He could very easily have called 911 if she was harming their kids, but that's not what happened.


He killed her.
You have ZERO knowledge of who killed those kids unless you were in the room.

I hope you're never on a jury or have to make a decision based on facts and not emotion.


So you think that he DIDN'T kill the kids and yet dumped them in the oil barrel? I hope you never have to make a decision based on deduction and logic.


+1,000,000

DP here. To any objective bystander there is no alternative explanation for why he would try to hide the bodies if he didn't kill them himself. But the defense will try to cast doubt on that and confuse the jury, and all you need is a consensus of reasonable doubt (reference the Casey Anthony trial). This is assuming no other forensic or other type of evidence turns up to corroborate him murdering the girls (which it probably will since he has already proven not very careful in covering his tracks). And assuming he/his family will be able to pay for top-notch legal representation.


I really don't care what can and can not be used in court. He's a white guy who killed his family, so I'm sure he'll get a very light sentence. That doesn't make him innocent. He's clearly evil.

Based on...? Scott Peterson is white and he's on death row for killing his pregnant wife. White privilege only gets you so far in life.

Do you know what Watts has been charged with? First degree murder -- 5 counts! That's the most serious penalty available under the law. If he gets convicted he will get life in prison or death penalty. There's not going to be a "light sentence" option. The only other possibility is he gets off for the girls' murders and some lesser sentence for tampering with bodies which there is ample evidence of him doing plus a sworn confession. It's also still unclear how he plans to plead the charges for the wife's murder, but he's admitted he killed her with his hands so...

Anyway my point was that while it's not at all plausible or logical that someone would hide their kids' bodies after the other parent killed them, his lawyers will try to paint that picture and there is always a chance it could sway the jury if the rest of the evidence is questionable.

I'm not defending him, I think he murdered them all and it's unacceptable no matter what his reason is. I'm guessing the prosecution will have more evidence than what's been disclosed - first degree murder means you basically think he was lying in wait.



Exactly. PP making it about race is offensive. Crazy comes in every color.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.


He checked out long before this illiterate video. I hope he BURNS in hell.


Yes horrible monster. His gf's name is already out, appears she is also married.

She deserves the mess she is in for her part in the destruction of this family. On the upside Chris is going to get his dance card punched frequently in prison.


Unfortunately adultery is no biggie to a huge swath of the population.

My MIL was telling me an a woman in her neighborhood who cheated and her husband was crushed. He drove off into the night in turmoil and agony and had a fatal automobile accident.

His “grieving” widow collected his insurance and married her AP after he walked out on his family.

Ah, so convenient.
Anonymous
At least he was a legal citizen.

It would have been so terrible if the kids and wife would have been killed by an illegal immigrant.

The husband spoke perfect English too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP7Hfj7ONE


YouTube


Communication Speech, Relationship Deterioration and Repair
Christopher Watts20,616 views

Here’s the dad/husband of the year in a video about relationships. From a few years ago. While he apparently was still human-ish.


He checked out long before this illiterate video. I hope he BURNS in hell.


Yes horrible monster. His gf's name is already out, appears she is also married.

She deserves the mess she is in for her part in the destruction of this family. On the upside Chris is going to get his dance card punched frequently in prison.

He was the one who destroyed the family. Not the AP. She's probably some dimwit who swooned over male attention, or was similarly unhappy in her own marriage. Maybe he told her he was going to leave his wife for her.

You don't know.

This is 100% him.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: