Any quality 30+ guys left?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Nope. Most have Peter pan syndrome. They're running after 18 yr old harlots like my teen cousins. |
Anonymous
 I wonder if he knew to make a throw away email address.
|
Anonymous
| Yeah, but 40+ is an issue. |
Anonymous
Yes and no. If they’ve never been in a relationship by 40, or engaged/married some responsibility outside of their self? There is a very high risk of other red flags around emotional immaturity, inability to adapt to change, and some thought processes may be firmly cemented. On the other hand, sometimes 40+ is better because they’ve been through those things, made mistakes and accept remorse, and they value the relationship more than someone whose first is a unicorn might. It really depends on so much. My dad always taught me that looks aren’t enough and you’d better have something to bring to the table. For some people, thaf will be a tall order, depending on what “quality” means. Especially in this area. There are a lot of normal people who aren’t all highfaluting that fall in love every day. Usually you bond with people who are meeting you where you are. If there is quality issue — look within. |
Anonymous
Use 'em then lose 'em! Seriously, divorced at 32 after marrying into a relationship that wasn't a good fit, and now single are all around playboys or losers... you sound high maintenance, gold-digger, entitled, princess, and I can't help but think you should shoulder some responsibility for your situation and outlook. Maybe your solution is to take time to grow. |
Anonymous
This guy has to be a troll. There's no way someone would include their own email address and also indicate that he's married. Definitely a troll. |