Oscars red carpet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Her ass doesn’t look that good, though. I actually like the stark simplicity of the front for a woman of a certain age. But the side view is tragic.

It does look good for someone in their 50s who I suspect has not had plastic surgery done (I think this is a point of personal pride for her). But that doesn't mean the dress is flattering or that it is worthwhile for everyone to go look at her butt. She looks good for her age and also she has some age appropriate sagging and dimpling. No shame at all, I have the same (and also look good for my age!) but it's just going to invite people to comment on how her butt isn't good enough for this look. When in reality, this dress is only going to look good on a supermodel because of the amount of exposure. She's naked.

This whole time I’ve thought Paltrow was in her late 60s. She’s only 53?! Why do all these Hollywood women look so old? It’s horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Demi Moore as well but amazing dress. I don't know how to post pictures from a tablet. It was a black sparkly sheath with feathers for the top.

Yasss!

I'm sick of Demi Moore. When it looked like she had lobbed her hair for Paris Fashion Week, I was so excited - but alas, it was just a wig. The hair is beyond dated and old.

Her hair is gorgeous. You're rude. You will never look that good at her age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Her ass doesn’t look that good, though. I actually like the stark simplicity of the front for a woman of a certain age. But the side view is tragic.

It does look good for someone in their 50s who I suspect has not had plastic surgery done (I think this is a point of personal pride for her). But that doesn't mean the dress is flattering or that it is worthwhile for everyone to go look at her butt. She looks good for her age and also she has some age appropriate sagging and dimpling. No shame at all, I have the same (and also look good for my age!) but it's just going to invite people to comment on how her butt isn't good enough for this look. When in reality, this dress is only going to look good on a supermodel because of the amount of exposure. She's naked.

This whole time I’ve thought Paltrow was in her late 60s. She’s only 53?! Why do all these Hollywood women look so old? It’s horrible.

White women generally look super old super fast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

These are both gorgeous but I thought the point of changing for the parties was to wear something more casual/comfortable/easy to move in etc.? I can’t imagine navigating a party in this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm disappointed in the DCUMers who know how to post photos! We need more to discuss than NK's dress color and arms (bad, good) and Kelly Ripa's chest size (not the point the original poster was trying to make).

Why don't *you* post photos? I'm disappointed in you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Her ass doesn’t look that good, though. I actually like the stark simplicity of the front for a woman of a certain age. But the side view is tragic.

It does look good for someone in their 50s who I suspect has not had plastic surgery done (I think this is a point of personal pride for her). But that doesn't mean the dress is flattering or that it is worthwhile for everyone to go look at her butt. She looks good for her age and also she has some age appropriate sagging and dimpling. No shame at all, I have the same (and also look good for my age!) but it's just going to invite people to comment on how her butt isn't good enough for this look. When in reality, this dress is only going to look good on a supermodel because of the amount of exposure. She's naked.

This whole time I’ve thought Paltrow was in her late 60s. She’s only 53?! Why do all these Hollywood women look so old? It’s horrible.

White women generally look super old super fast.

Sure, if they smoke and don't wear sunscreen...
I mean, she has visible sun damage on her skin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

Agree. And some of these women are not thin due to ozempic. Demi has looked this way for decades now. I think some of those women limit carbs, eat no sugar, and work out a couple hours a day. Anniston is another like that. I don’t even think it’s really an eating disorder — they are actually probably really healthy but I would be homicidal if I lived like that. But I do know people who really love a lean chicken breast over bulgar with kale followed by an hour of Pilates.

I admit it totally don’t know but Kidman has the look to me of someone who is so stressed out by her perfectionism that she has diarrhea almost every day. She just seems so, so tightly wound.

This is just straight up insane. OF COURSE IT'S AN EATING DISORDER.

Are you one of those ignorant people who think every thin person has an eating disorder? My mother, my best friend and my son are all underweight naturally and have tiny appetites. They're genetically programmed that way. All three have been on weight-gaining diets at some point in their lives.

Also, plump people can have eating disorders too, just so you know. The size you see has NOTHING to do with the existence of an eating disorder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ripa is actually very curvy naturally but she diets so extremely which has shrunk her body. Her daughter looks like her when she was younger in terms of her normal body type.

What? She has *never* been very curvy. Her natural body type is a little tiny thing. Always has been.

Nope. Look at her early days on Live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

These are both gorgeous but I thought the point of changing for the parties was to wear something more casual/comfortable/easy to move in etc.? I can’t imagine navigating a party in this.

I think sometimes people use it to wear something more casual and fun, but this may have been a situation where she had two dresses made for her and couldn't choose so wore one to the awards and the other to the after party. Because of her pregnancy she was likely just working with a designer from the jump and having things custom made and fitted, it's different than someone who can just wear a fun party dress that a stylist threw on a rack for them and picked at the last minute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

Ugh! I hate both of these.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Basing my comments off this article: https://variety.com/gallery/2026-oscars-red-carpet-fashion-looks/98th-annual-oscars-arrivals-64/

Jessie Buckley: I don't mind it
Ginnifer Goodwin: A disaster. Her hair and makeup are awful. She's too pale for this look.
Nina Gold: Absurdly casual for this event.
Wunmi Mosaku: Agree with a PP; love the color and sparkles, not a fan of the neckline
Kerry Condon: She looks incredibly awkward, but I HATE the top. I'm not a fan of that style at all.
Wagner Moura: Silver fox. He looks good!
Odessa A’zion: Looks messy and inappropriate for this event
Liza Powel O’Brien: Can't stand the top. It looks like something you'd wear for BDSM.
McKenna Grace: Gorgeous and elegant.
Lea Myren: trying to be the next Bjork? I don't mean that as a compliment.
Lola Kirke: It looks like she threw on 2-3 dresses to make this bizarre combination dress.
Emily V. Gordon: Interesting! I think it's pretty.
Chase Infiniti: I might have put her in a different color? The bodice fits her SO well.
Misty Copeland: Horrifyingly ugly dress
Barbie Ferreira: I hate this dress. The bodice doesn't fit her and the bottom of the bodice looks like a 5-year-old took scissors to it. The bottom is a weird buttoned skirt. Yuck.
Rose Byrne: stunning
Felicity Jones: I don't like the color, the fit, the weird mesh netting...hard pass.
Charithra Chandran: the color is beautiful but way too much dress
Bella Thorne: awful dress, but she's an awful human.
May Hong: I'll be so thrilled when this ugly sheer panel/let's pretend we're nude trend dies.
Kevin O’Leary: Proof money can't buy you class or fashion

...there are more, but my snark is running low.

I hadn’t seen Ginnifer Goodwin before this and you’re so right. The dress is interesting not in a bad way and the choker is terrific but her hair and face are so severe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Renate Reinsve, whose style I really loved (best actress nominee, Sentimental Value). This dress looks much, much cooler in motion -- I will try to find a better photo. The slit on her left leg goes up to her hip and it's very sexy.

It looks like she’s wearing a towel.

Scandinavian simplicity.

Exactly. No Scandinavian would be caught dead in that froofy pastel nightmare that Chase Infiniti was wearing.

Don't be ridiculous. It has nothing to do with "Scandinavian simplicity." Here's Alicia Vikander looking stunning from other Oscars:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

Ugh! I hate both of these.

Why?

It's hard to do maternity on the red carpet and these both seem to nail it -- great colors, textures, they fit well, there's some drama. Seems like she nailed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

Ugh! I hate both of these.

Agreed. Stunning lady but Louis Vuitton did not do her any favors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.

Ugh! I hate both of these.

Agreed. Stunning lady but Louis Vuitton did not do her any favors.

You are both high.