Hegseth Ordered Second Strike to Kill Caribbean Boat Survivors

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone asked why the US is going after the small fry while Trump just pardoned one of the biggest narco traffickers ever?

Many people have asked. But MAGA has no answer.

[Anonymous]

Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

[Anonymous]

Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

[Anonymous]

Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

DP. Are you stupid or something? This has been explained to you countless times. Go back to talking about the moon land was faked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

1. Where is the evidence of who they were and what crimes they had committed? Actual evidence, not your feelings or belief in what you’re told by Leavitt or Tom Cotton.

2. Tens of millions of democrats criticized the casualties of innocent civilians during Obama’s drone strike orgy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Maybe ask Obama.

“We used double-taps all the time,” said David Shedd, former deputy director and acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration. “You would get the initial signature off of a target that’s been hit,” he told me in a podcast interview, “and if you saw that they ‘squirted’ and were injured … you hit them again.” In fact, he said, “there was often a second predator ready to go … that was fully expected to be used if you didn’t have a 100 percent coming out of the first hit — and maybe a third hit,” adding that “it was done routinely” and there “was bipartisan support on the Hill for doing it.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

This.
There was a time when Americans were the good guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Maybe ask Obama.

“We used double-taps all the time,” said David Shedd, former deputy director and acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration. “You would get the initial signature off of a target that’s been hit,” he told me in a podcast interview, “and if you saw that they ‘squirted’ and were injured … you hit them again.” In fact, he said, “there was often a second predator ready to go … that was fully expected to be used if you didn’t have a 100 percent coming out of the first hit — and maybe a third hit,” adding that “it was done routinely” and there “was bipartisan support on the Hill for doing it.”

So they were killing prisoners, civilians or ship wreck survivors? We targeted civilians with predatory drones because they had a speeding ticket?The US military is now the IDF, IJA or the Einsatzgruppen. We just round up civilians and kill them. You are amoral to defend this administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth is a drunk liar far too immature and inexperienced for the role. So there’s that.

[Anonymous]

Hegseth told the all the generals and admirals at Quantico the US does not have any rules of engagement.

Look for a lot of pits filled with women and child in Venezuela. This is what you voted for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth thinks the fog of war is some smoke from an explosion. He’s a weekend news host moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Maybe ask Obama.

“We used double-taps all the time,” said David Shedd, former deputy director and acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration. “You would get the initial signature off of a target that’s been hit,” he told me in a podcast interview, “and if you saw that they ‘squirted’ and were injured … you hit them again.” In fact, he said, “there was often a second predator ready to go … that was fully expected to be used if you didn’t have a 100 percent coming out of the first hit — and maybe a third hit,” adding that “it was done routinely” and there “was bipartisan support on the Hill for doing it.”

For the 1,000th time, most sane people I know are 100% supportive of stringing up anyone involved in bringing about this kind of conduct … I don’t care what party they are affiliated with. String them up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth thinks the fog of war is some smoke from an explosion. He’s a weekend news host moron.

The "fog of war" from thousands of miles away. Sounds like a cringe teenager playing video games.