Hegseth Ordered Second Strike to Kill Caribbean Boat Survivors

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth thinks the fog of war is some smoke from an explosion. He’s a weekend news host moron.

Hegseth saw the first strike and ran out of the room in under 30 seconds after ordering the killing of ship wreck survivors. Maybe he need some more drink?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth thinks the fog of war is some smoke from an explosion. He’s a weekend news host moron.

Hegseth saw the first strike and ran out of the room in under 30 seconds after ordering the killing of ship wreck survivors. Maybe he need some more drink?

Hegseth is the secdef. It is his responsibility regardless of what he did or didn’t see or hear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

That is not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

That is not true.

You are correct. The Afghan wedding bombing killed 37 people, mostly women and children. Your poignant comeback only shows your ignorance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

That is not true.

You are correct. The Afghan wedding bombing killed 37 people, mostly women and children. Your poignant comeback only shows your ignorance.[/]

DP

I don’t need either party to be saints to call out evil when I see it, wherever I see it. I wouldn’t stop you from kicking Joe Biden down a well, if that helps.

Does that prove to you that my contempt for extrajudicial killings on the high seas is coming from a place of objective assessment?

[Anonymous]

Holy shit, the vessel is now acknowledged to have been no threat - direct or otherwise - to U.S. territory. By the Admiral who ordered the strike(s). Maybe now the Democrats will fire a backbone and actually hold someone accountable (looking at you, Obama and you’re “bygones” approach to Dick Cheney).

These war criminals should really consider the skyscraper route before the choice is taken away from …

As for you defending them …

[Anonymous]

Unintentionally killing some civilians is not what happened here.

The military always tried to prevent killing civilians but accidents DO happen. Information CAN be wrong.

This was intentional and then they celebrated with glee like the psychopaths they are.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

What I’d like to know is what kind of institutional priorities must exist that all of these imbeciles in Congress like Tom Cotton and Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz found themselves with Ivy League educations.

Dead serious. These are profoundly lowbrow guys when you face facts - so how? And why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Holy shit, the vessel is now acknowledged to have been no threat - direct or otherwise - to U.S. territory. By the Admiral who ordered the strike(s). Maybe now the Democrats will fire a backbone and actually hold someone accountable (looking at you, Obama and you’re “bygones” approach to Dick Cheney).

These war criminals should really consider the skyscraper route before the choice is taken away from …

As for you defending them …

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I’d like to know is what kind of institutional priorities must exist that all of these imbeciles in Congress like Tom Cotton and Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz found themselves with Ivy League educations.

Dead serious. These are profoundly lowbrow guys when you face facts - so how? And why?

My theory is that these schools attract a lot of sociopaths who are willing to lie, cheat, and step on others to create the type of resume it takes to get in.

I have repeatedly said that these schools need to do personality/psych/character assessments too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unintentionally killing some civilians is not what happened here.

The military always tried to prevent killing civilians but accidents DO happen. Information CAN be wrong.

This was intentional and then they celebrated with glee like the psychopaths they are.

+1

[Anonymous]

The fact that these shitbags edge themselves with words like “lethality” and renamed DoD the “Department of War”, like they are playing big boy games with their G.I. Joe action figures, says it all, I guess …

[Anonymous]

Hegseth is cosplaying Rambo: “Department of War,” Secretary of War,” soldiers are now “warriors,” “Biden let drug traffickers and terrorists into the US…we kill them.” Yet he and Donald are the biggest pussies in the world and get to talk tough because they have massive protection details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy shit, the vessel is now acknowledged to have been no threat - direct or otherwise - to U.S. territory. By the Admiral who ordered the strike(s). Maybe now the Democrats will fire a backbone and actually hold someone accountable (looking at you, Obama and you’re “bygones” approach to Dick Cheney).

These war criminals should really consider the skyscraper route before the choice is taken away from …

As for you defending them …

Yup.

Surinam should send us a thank you note and offer to go Dutch on the cost of the missiles. We did them a solid. If those drugs had reached their shores, think of all the associated misery. I love a happy ending.

International drug running should be detrimental to a lengthy lifespan.