Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will there be a live audience at the debate?

There will be no live audience, a request from Biden’s campaign to avoid giving Trump the chance to play to the crowd.

How will microphone control work during the debate?

To prevent interruptions, candidates' microphones will be muted when it isn't their turn to speak, an effort to curb Trump's tendency to interrupt.

https://www.fox7austin.com/news/biden-trump-debate-rules-2024.amp

The Biden-Trump debate had rules Biden insisted upon; Trump should not be held to any rules he negotiated with Biden.

Step up Kamala. Show us you are not afraid.

He can't debate without interrupting and a live audience? Then he should find a different job then being president.

Why won’t Kamala commit to the debate?

She did but not on lying Fox. They do not get to spew lies about the 2020 election and then get a debate for 2024. Lying actually has consequences.

The entire MSM lied about the health of the president of the United States and colluded with the DNC to keep the American people from finding out the president was deteriorating mentally and physically.

Prove it and get your big fat settlement in court.

If Trump is so old, has dementia, can’t speak or think, why doesn’t Kamala show up
to the debate and show the difference between the two candidates? She was a prosecutor and says Trump is the kind of person she’s used to dealing with. She should have be able to destroy Trump in front of the American people easily.

She should not do that on fox. They screw over the viewers with their lies and the candidates should refuse to debate on such a network.

Trump went on CNN; why can’t Kamala go on Fox? A president should be able to speak to everyone.

Did CNN lose an 800 million dollar court case about lying?

Kamala is a former prosecutor. She knows how to handle bad guys. If she gets elected she will be America’s president and deal with heads of state who also lie. Putin? She can handle a debate at Fox, can’t she?

The don't deserve the debate. She will crush him on a different network.

She should be able to crush him on any network.

You keep missing the point that lying has consequences and fox does not deserve this debate. Too bad fox. You should have thought about that during your last lying election coverage.

Your opinion about Fox news isn’t reality. This isn’t about Fox news. Kamala should be able to hand Trump his ass anytime, anywhere. If she shows up on Fox and destroys Trump she will win the election and destroy Trump forever. It would be epic.

Likewise, Trump should be able to hand Harris het ass anytime, anywhere. But he obviously can't, because he's running scared to his Fox sycophants, and making up phony excuses about conflicts of interests.

Democrats don’t get to choose every debate venue and all the rules. Trump and Biden made agreements for 2 debates. Biden was forced out by his party. Trump is allowed to choose a venue and some rules, too.

the iunderlined conflicts with the bolded

Also, the Trump-Vance campaign negotiated with the Biden-Harris Campaign. Biden is not there anymore, but Harris is.

Ergo, the result of the deal Trump negotiated stands.

What makes you believe you personally make decisions about the debate? Do tell.

Somebody else is telling Donald J Trump where to go and when? Who's his boss???

Putin and thus Semion Mogilevich.

Putin said he wanted Biden to win. Trump sold ukraine javelins, the javelins Obama was scared to sell ukraine because he knew it would anger Putin. Putin took land under Obama and Biden but not Trump.

Putin was gaslighting.
Trump "sold" Ukraine Javelins but with the stipulation they remain in the western part of the country,a way from Donbas and Crimea, you know, where the Russian tanks were at the time.

He also tried to blackmail the Ukrainian president for a personal favor. He then instructed the GOP not to provide support to Ukraine and had Tuberville withhold key military promotions.

Understand the full breadth of circumstances and not solely the narrative from Trump is kind of important.

Good grief.
Seems you are writing your own version of events. We cannot take you seriously.

What did I write that was false? I can provide sourcing for everything I wrote.

Example;

https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-leaving-out-key-detail-trump-javelin-sale-to-ukraine-2019-11

Under the rules of the sale, the Javelin missiles have to be stored in western Ukraine, which is far from the frontlines of the ongoing conflict in the eastern part of the country (the Donbas region) against pro-Russia separatists.

So you are denying ukraine used the javelins?

Please cite a source that says the javelins were not used.

The javelins had to be stored away from any russian claimed territory. They are defensive weapons only. Any use of javelins on russian territory would cause an escalation of war and give russians the right to strike directly at the US.

Now cite that javelins were never used in ukraine, that they were sold by Trump and only stored.

Thanks for moving the goalposts. Again, nothing I posted was false.

“The Trump administration first approved the sale of Javelins to Ukraine in December 2017 -- a step that former President Barack Obama never took and that Trump allies have pointed to as a sign of Trump's toughness on Russia. Ukraine has been fighting Russian-armed and led separatists in its eastern provinces since 2014, shortly after Russia illegally occupied and annexed Crimea, in a war that has claimed approximately 13,000 lives and displaced 1.5 million people, according to the Ukrainian government.

That first sale, which was completed in March 2018, included 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units and was intended to "help Ukraine build its long-term defense capacity to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity in order to meet its national defense requirements," according to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency.“
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-admin-approves-sale-anti-tank-weapons-ukraine/story?id=65989898


U.S.-made Javelin missiles are ‘vital’ to Ukraine’s fight against Russia, experts say

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna20878


“The Javelin antitank missiles that figured in former President Donald Trump’s first impeachment for deliberately delaying military aid to Ukraine are now wreaking havoc on the Russian invaders.

The lightweight but lethal weapon has, military experts said, helped the underdog Ukrainians inflict major damage on Moscow’s much-vaunted military and stymie their advance.


Not only has the United States-made weapon become a symbol of resistance, it’s been dubbed “Saint Javelin” in a meme circulating on the web created by Canadian marketer Christian Borys, which shows Mary Magdalene, a saint of the Orthodox church, cradling a Javelin in her arms.

“The Javelin, very specifically that system’s advanced capabilities, have been vital to Ukrainian military survival and ability to hold ground” against the Russians, said John Spencer, chair of urban warfare studies at the nonpartisan Madison Policy Forum in New York City.”

The javelin were not being stored away indefinitely.

The thing you put in red happened WHEN BIDEN WAS PRESIDENT.

KIEV (Reuters) - Ukraine has received the first U.S. Javelin missiles and launch units, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said on Monday.
In March the U.S. State Department approved the possible sale of Javelin systems to Ukraine at an estimated cost of $47 million.
"I can confirm that the long-awaited weapon arrived in the Ukrainian army" Poroshenko said on Facebook.
Kiev and Washington believe that the Javelin system will help Ukraine build its long-term defense capacity.
The United States has been one of Kiev's staunchest supporters since Moscow's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent outbreak of fighting in Ukraine's eastern Donbass region that has killed more than 10,000 people.
But the decision to provide lethal aid was sensitive and Russia has repeatedly said supplying weapons to Ukraine would further destabilize the situation by encouraging Kiev to use force.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-jevelin/ukraine-receives-us-javelin-systems-poroshenko-idUSKBN1I11ZY/


"I am sincerely grateful for the fair decision of [U.S. President] Donald Trump in support of Ukraine, in defense of freedom and democracy," Poroshenko wrote. "Washington not only fulfilled our joint agreement, it demonstrated leadership and an important example."

Ukrainian Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak wrote on his Facebook page that Ukrainian troops would begin training with the new weapons on May 2.

After months of heated debate in Washington and, reportedly, much reluctance on the part of U.S. President Donald Trump, the White House was said to have approved the Javelin sale in December.

That announcement sparked a sharp rebuke from Moscow, with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov accusing the United States of "fomenting a war."

Two sources who wished to remain anonymous as they were not authorized to speak publicly about it -- one in Ukraine and the other in the United States -- confirmed the Javelin deliveries to RFE/RL ahead of the State Department announcement.

Neither disclosed when the missile systems arrived in Ukraine, whether all the promised missiles and launchers had been sent or where they were being stored; or whether Ukraine’s military had begun training on Javelins. But one of the sources added that the Javelins were delivered “on time.”

The State Department provided no details beyond the confirmation of the delivery.
https://www.rferl.org/amp/javelin-missile-delivery-ukraine-us-confirmed/29200588.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will there be a live audience at the debate?

There will be no live audience, a request from Biden’s campaign to avoid giving Trump the chance to play to the crowd.

How will microphone control work during the debate?

To prevent interruptions, candidates' microphones will be muted when it isn't their turn to speak, an effort to curb Trump's tendency to interrupt.

https://www.fox7austin.com/news/biden-trump-debate-rules-2024.amp

The Biden-Trump debate had rules Biden insisted upon; Trump should not be held to any rules he negotiated with Biden.

Step up Kamala. Show us you are not afraid.

He can't debate without interrupting and a live audience? Then he should find a different job then being president.

Why won’t Kamala commit to the debate?

She did but not on lying Fox. They do not get to spew lies about the 2020 election and then get a debate for 2024. Lying actually has consequences.

The entire MSM lied about the health of the president of the United States and colluded with the DNC to keep the American people from finding out the president was deteriorating mentally and physically.

Prove it and get your big fat settlement in court.

If Trump is so old, has dementia, can’t speak or think, why doesn’t Kamala show up
to the debate and show the difference between the two candidates? She was a prosecutor and says Trump is the kind of person she’s used to dealing with. She should have be able to destroy Trump in front of the American people easily.

She should not do that on fox. They screw over the viewers with their lies and the candidates should refuse to debate on such a network.

Trump went on CNN; why can’t Kamala go on Fox? A president should be able to speak to everyone.

Did CNN lose an 800 million dollar court case about lying?

Kamala is a former prosecutor. She knows how to handle bad guys. If she gets elected she will be America’s president and deal with heads of state who also lie. Putin? She can handle a debate at Fox, can’t she?

The don't deserve the debate. She will crush him on a different network.

She should be able to crush him on any network.

You keep missing the point that lying has consequences and fox does not deserve this debate. Too bad fox. You should have thought about that during your last lying election coverage.

Your opinion about Fox news isn’t reality. This isn’t about Fox news. Kamala should be able to hand Trump his ass anytime, anywhere. If she shows up on Fox and destroys Trump she will win the election and destroy Trump forever. It would be epic.

Likewise, Trump should be able to hand Harris het ass anytime, anywhere. But he obviously can't, because he's running scared to his Fox sycophants, and making up phony excuses about conflicts of interests.

Democrats don’t get to choose every debate venue and all the rules. Trump and Biden made agreements for 2 debates. Biden was forced out by his party. Trump is allowed to choose a venue and some rules, too.

the iunderlined conflicts with the bolded

Also, the Trump-Vance campaign negotiated with the Biden-Harris Campaign. Biden is not there anymore, but Harris is.

Ergo, the result of the deal Trump negotiated stands.

Old man Trump is just chicken and trying to back out.

That’s why he’s proposing a debate. He’s chicken. You are the King or Queen of Logic.

He’s proposing a debate on his own propaganda network.

Old man Trump knows she will clean his clock so he's just making excuses to get out of the deal he agreed to.

*with Biden. Who is no longer the candidate. Would you not renegotiate terms with a new candidate? I would.

Biden-Harris.

Biden i out, Harris isn't.

No. The debate was not scheduled with Biden/Harris. It was scheduled with Biden. Harris was scheduled to debate Vance. She has apparently dropped out of that one.

Time for new negotiations. Trump has a proposal on the table. Why is Kamala being such a chicken?

It was scheduled between the Republican candidate - who currently is Donald - and the Democratic - who currently is Harris.

Yep, DonOLD Trump is just chicken and trying to weasel out of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

[Anonymous]

#TrumpIsACoward

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

If Kamala doesn’t debate, fine. But Trump agreed to a debate with rules that Biden demanded he agree to, showed up, and debated.

Will kamala be the first presidential candidate in history to refuse to debate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Yes, the male candidates must arrange everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:#TrumpIsACoward

Yep, this is just his way chickening out.

[Anonymous]

What a chickenshit coward Trump is. He needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and an live audience of MAGA rubes. Pathetic.

He agreed to debate Biden on Sept. 10 on ABC. But now the dynamic has changed and suddenly he’s uh-fwaid….

Man up, Trump. Show us what you’re made of. (Although we think we have an idea.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

The end of MAGA is pretty fun. you all think that you in some way have public opinion on your side, or that your arguments are convincing at all. She's thriving as he collapses and this is all that's left to hold on to. Looking forward to 2028 when we can have an honest R challenge the D

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

Nope just Kamal Toe

Female candidate for president breaking the glass ceiling by refusing to debate. #HERstorynotHISstory

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

I think you're confused. Trump had agreed to debate the Dem candidate on 9/4 but is so afraid he's making excuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

The end of MAGA is pretty fun. you all think that you in some way have public opinion on your side, or that your arguments are convincing at all. She's thriving as he collapses and this is all that's left to hold on to. Looking forward to 2028 when we can have an honest R challenge the D

First presidential candidate who won’t debate before election day. Own it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I'm hearing is we won't get an actual debate.
Each side will claim that the other side is scared.
Each candidate will have an hour to sell their platform on their respective network. Unchallenged and in fact checked.

Brilliant.

Enough with the both sides nonsense. If Trump wants to debate, why is he shying away from the original agreed-to debate platform on ABC? Harris is ready to debate him as originally scheduled.

Yes both sides Both sides are behaving like 5 year olds. You are so far up your side that you can't see it.

Trump did agree to every rule Biden asked for and did attend the CNN debate.

If Kamala doesn’t agree to debate, she’s the candidate that refused to debate.

Then Trump's people should reach out to Harris's people about scheduling a Fox debate and work it out.

Trump debated Biden and has agreed to debate Kamala. She’s refusing the debate.

Has any previous candidate refused to debate before election day?

The end of MAGA is pretty fun. you all think that you in some way have public opinion on your side, or that your arguments are convincing at all. She's thriving as he collapses and this is all that's left to hold on to. Looking forward to 2028 when we can have an honest R challenge the D

Yep, Trump is imploding. In just a few weeks she's already passed him in most battleground states and has the momentum. People aren't fooled by DonOLD's cowardice.