MCPS Whistleblower Details Lies, Retaliation in Sexual Harassment Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope the post will be sued…

Lawyer here. No they won't and if they are, it'll be thrown out. She had no direct contact w/Beidleman. She's not even a part-time employee-she is a substitute in a massive district. Face it, Joel. You have no case. Your days are numbered. Deal with the repercussions of your disgusting actions.

Th ey found he wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. What are you talking about? I only trust the first report. The latter ones are just cherry picking

The first report would be the one that Khalid Walker submitted, not the one that was submitted with a fraudulent date. That first report found so much evidence of wrongdoing that the head of HR thought it would force MCPS to fire you, Joel.

That's not true

They authorized secondary reports when the original ones didn't say what they wanted.

They? Since the reports have come from different places who do you think “they” are? Q?

[Anonymous]

It really sucks people are trying to smear the journalist that exposed Biedelman and MCPS and whose findings have been confirmed by two separate entities including MCPS's own law firm. Not a good look folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope the post will be sued…

Lawyer here. No they won't and if they are, it'll be thrown out. She had no direct contact w/Beidleman. She's not even a part-time employee-she is a substitute in a massive district. Face it, Joel. You have no case. Your days are numbered. Deal with the repercussions of your disgusting actions.

Th ey found he wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. What are you talking about? I only trust the first report. The latter ones are just cherry picking

The first report would be the one that Khalid Walker submitted, not the one that was submitted with a fraudulent date. That first report found so much evidence of wrongdoing that the head of HR thought it would force MCPS to fire you, Joel.

That's not true

They authorized secondary reports when the original ones didn't say what they wanted.

They? Since the reports have come from different places who do you think “they” are? Q?

Don't all these groups work for the county?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope the post will be sued…

Lawyer here. No they won't and if they are, it'll be thrown out. She had no direct contact w/Beidleman. She's not even a part-time employee-she is a substitute in a massive district. Face it, Joel. You have no case. Your days are numbered. Deal with the repercussions of your disgusting actions.

Th ey found he wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. What are you talking about? I only trust the first report. The latter ones are just cherry picking

The first report would be the one that Khalid Walker submitted, not the one that was submitted with a fraudulent date. That first report found so much evidence of wrongdoing that the head of HR thought it would force MCPS to fire you, Joel.

That's not true

They authorized secondary reports when the original ones didn't say what they wanted.

They? Since the reports have come from different places who do you think “they” are? Q?

Don't all these groups work for the county?

MCPS is a state agency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope the post will be sued…

Lawyer here. No they won't and if they are, it'll be thrown out. She had no direct contact w/Beidleman. She's not even a part-time employee-she is a substitute in a massive district. Face it, Joel. You have no case. Your days are numbered. Deal with the repercussions of your disgusting actions.

Th ey found he wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. What are you talking about? I only trust the first report. The latter ones are just cherry picking

The first report would be the one that Khalid Walker submitted, not the one that was submitted with a fraudulent date. That first report found so much evidence of wrongdoing that the head of HR thought it would force MCPS to fire you, Joel.

That's not true

They authorized secondary reports when the original ones didn't say what they wanted.

They? Since the reports have come from different places who do you think “they” are? Q?

Don't all these groups work for the county?

MCPS is a state agency.

Weird I thought my county taxes funded it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

Teachers who are being abused in their workplace are not going to be able to focus on education. Time for accountability.
Time for this to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope the post will be sued…

Lawyer here. No they won't and if they are, it'll be thrown out. She had no direct contact w/Beidleman. She's not even a part-time employee-she is a substitute in a massive district. Face it, Joel. You have no case. Your days are numbered. Deal with the repercussions of your disgusting actions.

Th ey found he wasn't guilty of any wrong doing. What are you talking about? I only trust the first report. The latter ones are just cherry picking

The first report would be the one that Khalid Walker submitted, not the one that was submitted with a fraudulent date. That first report found so much evidence of wrongdoing that the head of HR thought it would force MCPS to fire you, Joel.

That's not true

They authorized secondary reports when the original ones didn't say what they wanted.

They? Since the reports have come from different places who do you think “they” are? Q?

Don't all these groups work for the county?

MCPS is a state agency.

911

Weird I thought my county taxes funded it.

You pay so much yet understand so little about the structure of government

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

Time is up for people like you who do this and enable this unacceptable behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

You sound just like McKnight. Who cares if a principal was abusive to his subordinates, violated the code of conduct, led to 25 teachers leaving a middle school in one year, and was protected by Central Office! Nothing to see here, let's not get distracted from our mission of partying it up...erg I mean education (is that what we do?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

You sound just like McKnight. Who cares if a principal was abusive to his subordinates, violated the code of conduct, led to 25 teachers leaving a middle school in one year, and was protected by Central Office! Nothing to see here, let's not get distracted from our mission of partying it up...erg I mean education (is that what we do?)

These teachers sound like kids themselves. Whining teachers would never survive in the corporate world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

You sound just like McKnight. Who cares if a principal was abusive to his subordinates, violated the code of conduct, led to 25 teachers leaving a middle school in one year, and was protected by Central Office! Nothing to see here, let's not get distracted from our mission of partying it up...erg I mean education (is that what we do?)

These teachers sound like kids themselves. Whining teachers would never survive in the corporate world.

Good for them for not tolerating abuse. Bad for the kids whose teachers could no longer teach them. What a disgrace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

You sound just like McKnight. Who cares if a principal was abusive to his subordinates, violated the code of conduct, led to 25 teachers leaving a middle school in one year, and was protected by Central Office! Nothing to see here, let's not get distracted from our mission of partying it up...erg I mean education (is that what we do?)

These teachers sound like kids themselves. Whining teachers would never survive in the corporate world.

Oh yay you are so impressive abusing your way through the big bad corporate world. Times up for you too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is nobody asking for a Non-Retaliation Policy? The #1 reason people do not report things is fear, uncertainty, and doubt, primarily due to retaliation.

Nearly all of the MCPS C-Suite have little experience being at the C-Suite. Reading the profiles of each of the C-Suite (which is too difficult to find) showcases that each is in a growth-type role for their career. Therefore, they are new to MCPS, new to their roles, and generally fearful of losing their opportunity. In such situations, people who lack experience are more likely to deceive, ignore, and retaliate. And let's be clear: "Bullying" and "retaliation" are two separate behaviors.

It is time for MCPS to hire 'experienced' candidates who have weathered the storm and can rebuild a broken organizational culture.

I'd rather they stop focusing on this nonsense and put some effort into educating kids.

I'd rather principals stop bullying and sexually harassing their staff and put some effort into educating kids.

Except nobody has done this. Some guy made some unfortunate comments reported by a few anonymous sources. This is hardly a big issue. Let's move along and get back to education please.

You sound just like McKnight. Who cares if a principal was abusive to his subordinates, violated the code of conduct, led to 25 teachers leaving a middle school in one year, and was protected by Central Office! Nothing to see here, let's not get distracted from our mission of partying it up...erg I mean education (is that what we do?)

These teachers sound like kids themselves. Whining teachers would never survive in the corporate world.

Again- these obvious troll posts designed to distract the thread- will not work. The attempt is so obvious, it is sad.

[Anonymous]

Just use the report button for troll posts. You don't have to respond to them.