That’s not how science works… |
That is a legit discussion. What public school reforms would you like to see? |
Why don't we have studies to determine what works and doesn't? Your repeated insistence to "Gah! Just get over it" doesn't do that. So, let's start there. What works, what doesn't, public, private, whatever. But you just want to shut down he discussion before it starts. No need to play with you anymore. |
Jesus Christ. It’s exactly how one is supposed to apply the scientific method. Generate a hypothesis (covid is gonna kill us all!), make observations (covid is killing old people and people with underlying immune, respiratory, and heart conditions), interpret results (there is a very clear and direct exponential trend of severity of outcomes from covid infection as a function of age), draw conclusions (this virus is dangerous to old people but not to kids), and in this case, suggest/implement policy (keep the schools open). So I suppose you are correct in that “that’s not how science works” because we have an entire generation of people who don’t understand how to correctly utilize the scientific method making decisions because SCIENCE. |
Further. We actually got to see real-world RCTs. Say Florida vs DC schools. And the data was clear by November/ December 2020: schools can safely open. |
Of course there are things that need fixing but they need fixing everywhere, not just in districts that were closed longer three years ago than districts that were not. |
DP: so you don't see a way to transfer private skill positives to public's? |
Weingarten wins the Nobel Prize for Learning Loss, shared of course by all who supported her crazy politics. |
This is a bit of an aside, but I also remember reading about the prevalence of “outbreaks” in a school system in Arizona which remained open. (This was years ago so I don’t recall the particular district.). But if one actually looked into the details (I’m kidding! We all know no one does!) one would see that in that particular report a school “outbreak” was defined as two or more students in the school testing positive for covid on the same day. Those students did not have to have any in-school exposure to each other (eg a child in k and a child in grade 6 who have no known contact with one another within the school both testing positive for covid would constitute an “outbreak” at the school) AND there were no controls for kids who were related (oh of course! Those kids are siblings and they got covid somewhere else). Conclusion: there is an outbreak at the school! Shut it down! Conclusion from people such as the “that’s not how science works” PP (probably): Schools that remained open had covid outbreaks! Keeping schools open was clearly dangerous! Insanity. |
Stop making stuff up. No where was closed that long. And there was no good option given how large the schools were. |
It just takes one person to spread it and most people are too selfish to keep their sick kids home. The issue was hospitals were overwhelmed and not enough ventilators. |
Wow, still defending those insane shutdowns in november 2023....some people never learn. |
Well at least you admit things are bad. But 'it's bad everywhere!" isn't really a compelling argument as to why we can't take a close look at public schools. |
How can you be so sure about that? It's only anecdotal, but I see a huge difference between my friends' kids in PA and who started back at school in the late fall of 2020 and many of the kids here who had no access to in-person school before the spring of 2021 (and had only limited access after that). I also see a difference between kids who attended private school and those from virtual public schools. It's more than academic; it includes social and emotional issues caused by the loss of real-life experiences and interaction with adults outside of their households that many kids didn't have for more than a year. That's part of the piece I think is missing from these discussions. |
Look at Florida. A disaster. |