DC crime stats - holy Toledo

[Anonymous]

Can a lawyer weigh in on why parents can't be held responsible for crimes committed by minors? From what I can tell, DC Counsel keeps arguing that the "juvenile" brain isn't fully formed until age 25 or so and we need to go even easier on these kids. If 14 year olds are committing carjackings, armed robberies etc but basically can't get punished. Then who is responsible? No ONE? this is a crime lovers paradise. Can't parents be prosecuted if their kid uses a gun n the home to shoot someone? Seems like if a parent is so lax that their 12 year old if committing crimes at 1am, then they should also be held responsible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Feelings =/= objective reality. In objective reality, you are less safe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

Nope. Self defense. Look forward reading about you getting hospitalized from a mugging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

Why would you wish harm on someone? Presumably for political differences. Says everything that we need to know about you.

[Anonymous]

SIX people were killed in DC on Saturday alone? Jesus.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Mass shooting in dc yesterday, three killed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can a lawyer weigh in on why parents can't be held responsible for crimes committed by minors? From what I can tell, DC Counsel keeps arguing that the "juvenile" brain isn't fully formed until age 25 or so and we need to go even easier on these kids. If 14 year olds are committing carjackings, armed robberies etc but basically can't get punished. Then who is responsible? No ONE? this is a crime lovers paradise. Can't parents be prosecuted if their kid uses a gun n the home to shoot someone? Seems like if a parent is so lax that their 12 year old if committing crimes at 1am, then they should also be held responsible.

in tort parents could be held responsible for actions of their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

Nope. Self defense. Look forward reading about you getting hospitalized from a mugging.

What an absolutely psychopathic thing to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

Nope. Self defense. Look forward reading about you getting hospitalized from a mugging.

What an absolutely psychopathic thing to say.

Not considering what was said to provoke the response.
Hysterical much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got my concealed carry permit as well. It’s easy to carry in a holster next to my seat, and I already feel a lot safer. I hope I never have to use it, but if I do then I am prepared to do what I have to do in order to protect myself from great bodily harm or death.

Look forward to seeing your trial when you shoot someone. Have fun when you get sued.

Nope. Self defense. Look forward reading about you getting hospitalized from a mugging.

What an absolutely psychopathic thing to say.

The PP was responding to another PP that wished that someone who “hoped they would never have to use their gun” would in fact have to use it, and then go to jail and be sued for that act of self defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can a lawyer weigh in on why parents can't be held responsible for crimes committed by minors? From what I can tell, DC Counsel keeps arguing that the "juvenile" brain isn't fully formed until age 25 or so and we need to go even easier on these kids. If 14 year olds are committing carjackings, armed robberies etc but basically can't get punished. Then who is responsible? No ONE? this is a crime lovers paradise. Can't parents be prosecuted if their kid uses a gun n the home to shoot someone? Seems like if a parent is so lax that their 12 year old if committing crimes at 1am, then they should also be held responsible.

From Day #1 DCPS hammers into AA kids that they are victims and the system is structurally against them. They watch YouTube videos of kids taking whatever they want with zero consequences. After five years of this they are sadly fully programmed and armed and dangerous. It can turn out no other way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can a lawyer weigh in on why parents can't be held responsible for crimes committed by minors? From what I can tell, DC Counsel keeps arguing that the "juvenile" brain isn't fully formed until age 25 or so and we need to go even easier on these kids. If 14 year olds are committing carjackings, armed robberies etc but basically can't get punished. Then who is responsible? No ONE? this is a crime lovers paradise. Can't parents be prosecuted if their kid uses a gun n the home to shoot someone? Seems like if a parent is so lax that their 12 year old if committing crimes at 1am, then they should also be held responsible.

From Day #1 DCPS hammers into AA kids that they are victims and the system is structurally against them. They watch YouTube videos of kids taking whatever they want with zero consequences. After five years of this they are sadly fully programmed and armed and dangerous. It can turn out no other way.

Looney white folk on here will attack you, but this is sadly the truth although a bit dramatized. And this is the reason that my AA son is now far away from DCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope one of these criminals is kind enough to target a Member of Congress again because that’s what it takes for Congress to intervene (the Council is a lost cause).

The council is indeed a lost cause, because no one in DC will vote for the opposition.

If you like your crime, you can keep your crime.