What if she fell in love with an unemployed 23-year old pothead and decided to marry him? Either way, there's nothing you can do about it, and ultimately she will have to live with her choices. |
There is no such thing as "wasting a woman's time". She wants a stable romantic partner/companion. So does he. She does not want it to result in marriage. Neither does he. Neither of them is a douche. They are both freely choosing exactly what they want, at that particular point in time. |
Many women are nit having sex with men their age anyway. No one calls them gross. So what if a 40 year old does not want to have sex with her 60 year old husband? Why judge her harsher than a 40 year old who does not want to have sex with her 40 year old husband? I still don't see why others people' choices are grossing you out. |
1. I admit freely I wouldn't want my DD married to a much older man. However, I think that marriage is rarely an outcome of relationships with a large age disparity so this isn't really a big concern. 2. I think your #2 is a bit hypocritical. Whenever DCUM has a discussion about "women should marry in their mid-twenties", there is typically a high-passion argument that mid-twenties is a bad time to get married, that this is the time to have fun, explore different relationships and the world, get to know themselves etc. Rarely is there an argument that all of this self-exploration is a "waste of time", in that it doesn't present a beeline to fully suitable matrimony. Yet here multiple posters, including myself, have suggested that while May-December relationships may well be a passing phase that isn't marriage-bound, only to be told that this is "wasting a woman's time". So you think it's OK to waste one's twenties on some things but not others? Why can't a relationship with a older man be a part of having fun and exploring the world in your twenties? |
So you think that every relationship not bound for the altar is a waste of time? |
Would you sleep with George Clooney (61), Tom Cruise (60) or Brad Pitt (59)? |
DP. Don't. The average 60 year old looks nothing like that. 😆 And I would not sleep with Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise. Their character flaws are too big. Looks and money cannot overcome some things. |
When you are a woman in your early 20s? Absolutely. |
You are completely out of touch with that generation. The women that I date are very upfront that they don’t want to think about marriage for at least five years and that anything we have going on is casual only. I’ve even discussed our imagined futures with other partners. They’re mostly waiting for men their age to catch up, which will happen at some point. |
I’m the PP you’re responding to and I don’t have a problem with whoever anyone wants to date as long as it’s legal. |
Or they won't and they will be the douchebags dating women in their 20s when they are 50. |
I dated late 20s-early 30s men in my 20s. Eventually I married a 36 yo man who was very established in his career and successful (11 years older than me). Plenty of fish for beautiful girls in their 20s who want to marry among 7-12 years older men. I would think the girls dating 50 years old are not that smart or attractive |
Yes, but thinking to the couples I know with a 20 year age difference, they got married when she was mid-20s to early 30s, so he was mid 40's to early 50s. The men like that, at least that I know, are well put together. A full head of non-grey hair, regular exercise, great hobbies and career too. Yes, I think the average middle-aged man will not have much luck finding a woman 20 years younger, but as these relationships are the exception not the norm anyway, the men tend to be "exceptional" compared to their peers also. |
|
| Since the racists can no longer be racist or homophobic and still lord their moral superiority over everyone, they’ve now decided to go with ageism. Got it. As long as they get to look down their nose and tell people who to date, I guess thats all that matters. |