Post-Roe, will there be more infants available to adopt?

[Anonymous]

Nope, most women will keep the babies they are forced to have, or have family members adopt them.

Some may be available for adoption at age 5+ after they are traumatized due to financial instability, moms abusive boyfriends, and alcohol / drug use.

[Anonymous]

Is infants all that you want
What about older than infant that needs a home temporarily?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know that there is this fantasy about blond, blue eyed girls with great SATs getting pregnant in college by a blond, blue eyed athlete, top scholar supply perfect babies for a bunch of Conservative hags to adopt but that isn’t happening. Sorry Amy.

Or just be like John Roberts and his wife and illegally import a set of twins from Europe. But that required wealth.

From all publicly available information out there, they were perfectly legal international adoptions, from Ireland, and the kids are not twins. But rant on if it makes you feel better.

[Anonymous]

Go make your own baby OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know that there is this fantasy about blond, blue eyed girls with great SATs getting pregnant in college by a blond, blue eyed athlete, top scholar supply perfect babies for a bunch of Conservative hags to adopt but that isn’t happening. Sorry Amy.

Or just be like John Roberts and his wife and illegally import a set of twins from Europe. But that required wealth.

From all publicly available information out there, they were perfectly legal international adoptions, from Ireland, and the kids are not twins. But rant on if it makes you feel better.

No, it was extremely shady where they transported the birthmother to another country to do the adoption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pro-choice supporters who can't admit it's killing babies are cowards and morons. Of course it is killing babies. I fully support a mom's right to kill her own baby as long as it has not yet been born. I don't apologize for my position and I won't hide behind "durrrr it's not really a life" like the other low iq degenerates

Saying “killing babies” over and over makes you sound like a simple, childish moron. Just FYI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion is almost always a preferable alternative to having your baby ripped away from you at birth.

“Murdering my child is better than providing for it to have a good life through the beneficence of a generous couple.”

God help us.

Yea, no. Having gone through a really difficult pregnancy I never ever want to be pregnant again. It’s not a baby.

That’s not what the poster, who clearly acknowledged the presence of human life said; they said better dead than adopted, which is outrageous.

As for you, try studying up on your biology and maybe some bioethics. Things are what they are. One can debate their relative value, but it is irrational, unscientific, and self deluding to convince oneself that some creature begins as one thing and ends as another.

Of course one thing can become another. A fertilized egg is not a chicken. A tadpole is not a frog. A caterpillar is not a butterfly. A blastocyst is not an infant.

And yes, with 100% certainty, I would choose my own life, my own dreams, my own children, and my own peace over a blastocyst. Not one iota of regret. I am a moral person and for me, my family, my sanity, and my community, abortion care would be welcome and necessary if I got pregnant now.

Calling things by different names does not render them ontologically different. A fertilized egg is a chicken in an early stage of development. Same with the frog. Same with the child in utero.

Actually it does.

Because literally an egg IS NOT a chicken.

And if I gave you the 1,800 or so individual parts of a car in your driveway, you would not have a car.

You really need to get some philosophical education. And truth is truth whether you believe it or not.

You are incorrect. You need to worry about your own education.

[Anonymous]

John Roberts and his wife flew the birthmothers to Peru from Ireland. Very shady. Ireland does not allow adoptions to the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:John Roberts and his wife flew the birthmothers to Peru from Ireland. Very shady. Ireland does not allow adoptions to the US.

Cite? Or you made that up. That's not how it happened. But carry on with your fiction if it makes you happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Roberts and his wife flew the birthmothers to Peru from Ireland. Very shady. Ireland does not allow adoptions to the US.

Cite? Or you made that up. That's not how it happened. But carry on with your fiction if it makes you happy.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/Intercountry-Adoption-Country-Information/Ireland.html

One orphan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Roberts and his wife flew the birthmothers to Peru from Ireland. Very shady. Ireland does not allow adoptions to the US.

Cite? Or you made that up. That's not how it happened. But carry on with your fiction if it makes you happy.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/Intercountry-Adoption-Country-Information/Ireland.html

One orphan.

You truly have no idea what you are talking about. Let it go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Roberts and his wife flew the birthmothers to Peru from Ireland. Very shady. Ireland does not allow adoptions to the US.

Cite? Or you made that up. That's not how it happened. But carry on with your fiction if it makes you happy.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/Intercountry-Adoption-Country-Information/Ireland.html

One orphan.

You truly have no idea what you are talking about. Let it go.

I’m not the poster you’re in an argument with, I’m saying the unavailability of children to adopt from Ireland is public record.

[Anonymous]

Poster needs to learn how to research to see that the shady adoption story is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or is it still a process with insanely long waitlists?

Hope you are able to have a family if you want one, but I wouldn’t expect adopting a baby to be possible. Adopting a kid can take years, but my friends who used a surrogate and donor started the process in 2020 and baby was just born few weeks ago. There were some obstacles along the way and money wasn’t an issue for them. Much like couples who conceive on their own, loss can occur along the way. No matter what method you use, it could take a couple years to have a baby or adopt a child.

Again , it does not. Every single person I know who has adopted a healthy black or brown child in the US has done it in less than a year.
Some friends did IVF galore, then surrogate (miscarriage). Years of that stuff. They finally did adoption of a healthy newborn Hispanic girl in about 8 months. Bright as can be, the light of their life.

[Anonymous]

We get all of our toys, board games, puzzles at consignment shops and garage sales.