Common Sense Gun Laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's taking away our freedom to go about our daily lives if we have to constantly think about arming ourselves.

This point seems to get missed far too much. We are more willing to regulate personal freedoms that only affect individuals and families on the basis of others' morality (e.g. whether I have certain medical procedures, whether my neighbor marries his boyfriend...) than we are to regulate personal freedoms that are potentially harmful. Even if your gun never shoots me, forcing me to go into public spaces with open carry has a measurable impact on my levels of physical stress.

What exactly are you proposing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's taking away our freedom to go about our daily lives if we have to constantly think about arming ourselves.

This point seems to get missed far too much. We are more willing to regulate personal freedoms that only affect individuals and families on the basis of others' morality (e.g. whether I have certain medical procedures, whether my neighbor marries his boyfriend...) than we are to regulate personal freedoms that are potentially harmful. Even if your gun never shoots me, forcing me to go into public spaces with open carry has a measurable impact on my levels of physical stress.

What exactly are you proposing?

Renewing the Assault Weapons Ban. All it would mean is they can't be sold. If you have already have one (or a hundred), nothing changes.

So, don't worry!, there would still be plenty of mass shootings. They'd just happen a little less frequently. But Republicans don't like that idea, so....

[Anonymous]

With all the childish rhetoric from the republicans, it is refreshing to hear our Vice President, Kamala Harris, finally make a rational, adult statement on the issue:

“Guns have triggers. When you squeeze guns they go bang. It’s very loud. Basically that’s bad.”

- Kamala Harris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We desperately need mental health checks before people can buy guns. I just found out that my dad bought a gun a year after being diagnosed with dementia. I knew my parents had two guns in a locked safe but I assumed my mom bought them. Nope. My dad just left the house randomly and came back with a gun. My mom had to confiscate it and hide it from him. My dad now believes the neighbor is trying to kill him. Imagine if he still had access to that gun.

Does your state have a red flag law? You and your mom can have him put on it. If not, your story might be a compelling one to share with state legislatures in support of such a law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With all the childish rhetoric from the republicans, it is refreshing to hear our Vice President, Kamala Harris, finally make a rational, adult statement on the issue:

“Guns have triggers. When you squeeze guns they go bang. It’s very loud. Basically that’s bad.”

- Kamala Harris

That makes no sense and it sounds like she is 3 not an adult. What is her proposal? What would she do? If it was take away all guns or even any guns, it is not going to happen. Democrats need to wake up and get gun reform done now, today. Whatever they can get. After November nothing will pass. If Red flag laws can be done today -- do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We desperately need mental health checks before people can buy guns. I just found out that my dad bought a gun a year after being diagnosed with dementia. I knew my parents had two guns in a locked safe but I assumed my mom bought them. Nope. My dad just left the house randomly and came back with a gun. My mom had to confiscate it and hide it from him. My dad now believes the neighbor is trying to kill him. Imagine if he still had access to that gun.

Does your state have a red flag law? You and your mom can have him put on it. If not, your story might be a compelling one to share with state legislatures in support of such a law.

Nope. They live in NH and the governor vetoed the red flag law back in 2020. Live Free and Die.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We desperately need mental health checks before people can buy guns. I just found out that my dad bought a gun a year after being diagnosed with dementia. I knew my parents had two guns in a locked safe but I assumed my mom bought them. Nope. My dad just left the house randomly and came back with a gun. My mom had to confiscate it and hide it from him. My dad now believes the neighbor is trying to kill him. Imagine if he still had access to that gun.

Does your state have a red flag law? You and your mom can have him put on it. If not, your story might be a compelling one to share with state legislatures in support of such a law.

Lol sure. They would arrest the mother for taking his gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time.

Awwwwww .. you poor thing. You might have to choose a different gun for your hunting and protecting and the earth will spin on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time.

The gulag was in Soviet Russia...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time.

So the reason you want guns it to kill elected officials and overthrow the elected government. You openly say this? Why should you be allowed to continue to have a weapon?

[Anonymous]

20 years ago, the fad of common sense gun reform was trigger locks, after they passed an assault weapons ban and a federal background check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”


At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”


Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms.

Idiot,

Massacre Reduction is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be. See

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people. Didja hear the latest? 19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?

Why does anyone need an AR 15? Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time.

The gulag was in Soviet Russia...

If you think your gun can out gun the US miliary you have no idea what they spend a DAY on defense weaponry.
May the odds be ever in your favor Tribute.

[Anonymous]

I need a nuclear weapon to protect myself against the US government. Why can't I have one?