The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

Chances are they already know all the dirty details

[Anonymous]

Does she ever truly take responsibility for anything...? Doesn't sound like it. It sounds like it's always someone's fault she does what she does. Like she's always the victim (or became an addict) because of the actions of someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does she ever truly take responsibility for anything...? Doesn't sound like it. It sounds like it's always someone's fault she does what she does. Like she's always the victim (or became an addict) because of the actions of someone else.

Does he???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

THIS. At the end of the day, that’s your daughter’s father. Do you really want their friends at school to know every detail of every conflict between their parents? You can already see so much hatred and disgust for each other by googling their names. It’s been years. Move on.

[Anonymous]

Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

I thought she was going to discuss her chronic pain and that being that start/cause of her addiction. The way we treat things here is (maybe was as she’s talking 4+ years ago) to just provide pills. Instead of pills in combination with other therapies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

I'm not sure what being a wealthy white woman who lives in a mansion and has healthy children has to do with anything if she's suffered some kind of trauma in the past that could fuel an addiction. While I think she's ultimately responsible for getting and staying clean, it's really impossible to know why she became an addict if you don't know her whole life story. Even rich, white people suffer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha, if by some chance you do read this, bravo to you. We'lll all be watching and reading. It sounds like it's been a hell of a journey and nothing shameful about having an addiction to cope. People can't judge if they aren't going through that experience. It's inspiring to see her step up and own this and want to speak her truth. We also still don't know the extent of his problems, addictions, or reason to lose all of his livelihood.

Don't let him bully you any more! Damn I wish she'd go on the news about this lol!!

Omg your Natasha fangirling is nauseating. We get it--in your delusional mind she's a on her way to becoming redeemed saint and he is the Antichrist.

I don't think she's a saint or innocent in any wrongdoing. It takes a lot of courage to do what she's finally doing, owning the truth and speaking up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha, if by some chance you do read this, bravo to you. We'lll all be watching and reading. It sounds like it's been a hell of a journey and nothing shameful about having an addiction to cope. People can't judge if they aren't going through that experience. It's inspiring to see her step up and own this and want to speak her truth. We also still don't know the extent of his problems, addictions, or reason to lose all of his livelihood.

Don't let him bully you any more! Damn I wish she'd go on the news about this lol!!

Omg your Natasha fangirling is nauseating. We get it--in your delusional mind she's a on her way to becoming redeemed saint and he is the Antichrist.

The first poster sounds like DANNI STARR!

I'm not Danni, I'm not Natasha, and I don't know any of these people. Just been watching the circus like the rest of you and if you've followed along it's pretty obvious who the one common denominator is in all the problems over the years with all the different staff members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

Chances are they already know all the dirty details

Chances are they've seen worse than anything she'll "reveal" in her blog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh Natasha, this ain’t it. She cares more about inflating her “I’m a champion for women” ego than the wellbeing of her children. It must be horrible for them to have so many intimate details of their parents’ split public. Both Kane and Natasha are responsible for that.. him discussing the split in the radio and her on her blog. And now Natasha is publicly broadcasting even more dirt their daughters will have to live with. I’m sure she’s tried to convince herself she’s doing good by them by being an example of a strong woman or something like that. Yeahhhh, just admit you’re in it for yourself and you want the attention at the expense of your children.

THIS. At the end of the day, that’s your daughter’s father. Do you really want their friends at school to know every detail of every conflict between their parents? You can already see so much hatred and disgust for each other by googling their names. It’s been years. Move on.

Fwiw, it sounds like he's still messing with her so she can't really move on. That's prolly a control thing and him desperately trying to keep her quiet. Makes you wonder why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha, if by some chance you do read this, bravo to you. We'lll all be watching and reading. It sounds like it's been a hell of a journey and nothing shameful about having an addiction to cope. People can't judge if they aren't going through that experience. It's inspiring to see her step up and own this and want to speak her truth. We also still don't know the extent of his problems, addictions, or reason to lose all of his livelihood.

Don't let him bully you any more! Damn I wish she'd go on the news about this lol!!

Omg your Natasha fangirling is nauseating. We get it--in your delusional mind she's a on her way to becoming redeemed saint and he is the Antichrist.

The first poster sounds like DANNI STARR!

I'm not Danni, I'm not Natasha, and I don't know any of these people. Just been watching the circus like the rest of you and if you've followed along it's pretty obvious who the one common denominator is in all the problems over the years with all the different staff members.

This.

His mental illness creates issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nat = a white stay at home mom with two healthy children who never had to work that lived in a mansion. I can’t think of someone less qualified to talk about what drives people to addiction. Epitome of champagne problems. Being a bored/resentful housewife with a douchey husband shouldn’t drive you to pop pills. I’m glad she got help and I’m glad she’s clean, but she is responsible for her addiction. The implication in her post that Kane drove her to it is ridiculous.

FYI She’s not white.

[Anonymous]

Natasha is not white. Her daughters are older now and I'm sure she has already told them about her addiction. IIRC she went to court ordered rehab in 2016. Once she reunited with the girls she had to have told them where she was. Age appropriate of course. I'm proud of her for telling her truth. Peter is not the only controlling abusive asshole man in the world.