What 2011 teams are qualifying this year??

[Anonymous]

Union has 9 kids going across 3 age groups. 👏

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Union has 9 kids going across 3 age groups. 👏

That’s amazing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

Not if you actually watched the games. Politics. But it is what it is...

Haters going to hate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

Not if you actually watched the games. Politics. But it is what it is...

So according to you, a parent lobbied so much that the coaching staff knowingly recommended a “weaker” girl?

Luckily you still willingly write that check to the club. Love watching FVU parents complain and then stay for more of the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

Not if you actually watched the games. Politics. But it is what it is...

So according to you, a parent lobbied so much that the coaching staff knowingly recommended a “weaker” girl?

Luckily you still willingly write that check to the club. Love watching FVU parents complain and then stay for more of the same.

This was in reference to Loudoun but it's all the same everywhere. Politics play a role in these invites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

Not if you actually watched the games. Politics. But it is what it is...

So according to you, a parent lobbied so much that the coaching staff knowingly recommended a “weaker” girl?

Luckily you still willingly write that check to the club. Love watching FVU parents complain and then stay for more of the same.

The previous post was referencing the 4 Loudoun selections, not FVU.

[Anonymous]

Union has 9 kids - nothing to be complaining about now really.

[Anonymous]

The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Do you think that only the starters on teams get recruited for college? Do you not notice the number of commitments from the top teams in the area? It’s more than 11…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.