What 2011 teams are qualifying this year??

[Anonymous]

They spread the love between the local clubs to keep anyone happy. It’s one big political hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

Maybe VDA does better job taking care of players?

This 100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

ID'S are for individuals not for the team so your comment makes no sense. Both teams has very talented players. I see no reason why both teams can have almost equally the amounts of ID's

The slots allowed per team are based on team performance. The coaches fill the slots. Do you get it now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

ID'S are for individuals not for the team so your comment makes no sense. Both teams has very talented players. I see no reason why both teams can have almost equally the amounts of ID's

The slots allowed per team are based on team performance. The coaches fill the slots. Do you get it now?

No it doesn't show example. VDA has had ARL # but Arl has better record. Both have just about the same IDs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

ID'S are for individuals not for the team so your comment makes no sense. Both teams has very talented players. I see no reason why both teams can have almost equally the amounts of ID's

The slots allowed per team are based on team performance. The coaches fill the slots. Do you get it now?

The slots have nothing to do with team success. How could they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

ID'S are for individuals not for the team so your comment makes no sense. Both teams has very talented players. I see no reason why both teams can have almost equally the amounts of ID's

The slots allowed per team are based on team performance. The coaches fill the slots. Do you get it now?

No it doesn't show example. VDA has had ARL # but Arl has better record. Both have just about the same IDs

Love the neighbor, regardless of their beliefs, religion, or nationality, or stop calling yourself a Christian. Not everyone has your beliefs and that is OK, it does not effect you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly, at this point ARL 2011 likely have the highest number of players that have been invited to the ID camps ...one more and i think thats half the team

Not true. Perhaps that is the perception but if you actually do the math, it’s not true. It’s a huge issue for the club, not just at this age group.

So what is your logic? The entire team should get selected?

Look, it was stated that ARL has had the
most invites. I said that statement isn’t true. At every camp there have been clubs with more players than ARL. It holds true again for the upcoming camp.

I never said the entire team should be selected. Rag on ARL all you want, but math is math.

Most kids that have been in total over time.

Also, not true. But ARL total attendees over time is a higher count than a number of clubs. So this statement is closer to the truth.

Tracking 7 for Arlington and 6 for VDA for 2011.

ARL 2011 are ECNL MA champions three years in a row and VDA have not even been close. Overall ranking and outside of ECNL track record reflect the same. There is no reason for the two teams to have near same USYNT ID invites if those are based on talent and performance.

ID'S are for individuals not for the team so your comment makes no sense. Both teams has very talented players. I see no reason why both teams can have almost equally the amounts of ID's

The slots allowed per team are based on team performance. The coaches fill the slots. Do you get it now?

No it doesn't show example. VDA has had ARL # but Arl has better record. Both have just about the same IDs

Love the neighbor, regardless of their beliefs, religion, or nationality, or stop calling yourself a Christian. Not everyone has your beliefs and that is OK, it does not effect you.

Affect *

[Anonymous]

Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Loudoun is a B team to NVA. How do they have players invited?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Loudoun is a B team to NVA. How do they have players invited?

In the eyes of GA, they are separate clubs so each club gets to send girls.

[Anonymous]

NVA had a couple of 2011 went last time so spread the love.

[Anonymous]

How about other local clubs other ages?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw Loudon GA posted 4 kids invited. Hopefully NVA has similar number.

Two 2010 and two 2011.

Congrats to the girls.

indeed. Congrats to those young ladies!! They stuck out and deserve it for sure.

Not if you actually watched the games. Politics. But it is what it is...