2025 Boys Private School Results /Game Schedules/ Commentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

moral

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

If you lose most of your ooc games for several years, maybe change the scheduling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

If you lose most of your ooc games for several years, maybe change the scheduling.

The newest ego in town seems to be Smith at GC. Scheduling Lawrenceville and national academy IMG is not the way. The pounding of the chest on social media is also tiresome for an Olney school primarily interested in football.

[Anonymous]

SJC doesnt have any quality wins this sprin.

Save the Taft nonsense, the program is a shell of what it once was since Nic Bell left for STAB.
The Rhinos are sub 500.

Landon’s best wins come against Bullis, GZ and Benjamin.

[Anonymous]

[list]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

If you lose most of your ooc games for several years, maybe change the scheduling.

The newest ego in town seems to be Smith at GC. Scheduling Lawrenceville and national academy IMG is not the way. The pounding of the chest on social media is also tiresome for an Olney school primarily interested in football.

He's hilarious. Needed to be carried by ref ball to beat a bad Heights team and thinks he can play with the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

Assists, for starters. Shooters are a dime a dozen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

Assists, for starters. Shooters are a dime a dozen.

Bullis got their faceoff man back. They’ll be fine. Even with you counting their passes at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[list]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

If you lose most of your ooc games for several years, maybe change the scheduling.

The newest ego in town seems to be Smith at GC. Scheduling Lawrenceville and national academy IMG is not the way. The pounding of the chest on social media is also tiresome for an Olney school primarily interested in football.

He's hilarious. Needed to be carried by ref ball to beat a bad Heights team and thinks he can play with the best.

The social media is cringe, but GC is better with him at the helm. Full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[list]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Landon and SJC switched schedules the records and narratives would likely be reversed.

Maybe. Eyeball test has Landon being a more complete team (faceoff dominance alone might do it), but there is no doubt SJC played an infinitely more challenging OOC schedule.

I bet we'll be complaining on these boards a year from now that SJC and IAC teams aren't playing. I really wish they'd all get over themselves and schedule games.

If you lose most of your ooc games for several years, maybe change the scheduling.

The newest ego in town seems to be Smith at GC. Scheduling Lawrenceville and national academy IMG is not the way. The pounding of the chest on social media is also tiresome for an Olney school primarily interested in football.

He's hilarious. Needed to be carried by ref ball to beat a bad Heights team and thinks he can play with the best.

The social media is cringe, but GC is better with him at the helm. Full stop.

Obviously. I'm a GC dad but it doesn't take much to get better from where GC was. He's a much better recruiter than a coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

Assists, for starters. Shooters are a dime a dozen.

Bullis got their faceoff man back. They’ll be fine. Even with you counting their passes at home.

So not so much on the assists then. Next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

It works against crap teams but you will need the TEAM and assist if you want to win anything especially for this special class! With the FOGO back they will have way more possessions.

Assists, for starters. Shooters are a dime a dozen.

Bullis got their faceoff man back. They’ll be fine. Even with you counting their passes at home.

So not so much on the assists then. Next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me ball narrative is so played out. Do you need a pass rule moron?

No you’re right. Dodging into two poles and shooting wide with no backup with 58 seconds on the shot clock isn’t just genius. It’s Georgetown Prep genius.

I’m talking about the ranker above saying me ball on Bullis’ part. They put 11 on a good GP team. By dodging drawing dumping finishing. The only me ball I saw in that game was done by the GP attack.

Not the OP, but let's be honest, there are 3-4 guys on Bullis that are known as guys that only like to shoot and worse, only think they play a good game if they score. And that comes out in Bullis offensive play, which is why the reputation sticks to Bullis right now. It really isn't hard to see if you know what are looking for. Watch the ride. Look who sets picks. See who clears out vs stands in one spot (the shooting spot). It's pretty obvious.

3 to 4 very good experienced players who are looked on to initiate and put pressure on the defense. Nothing worse than a team w/o players to put pressure on D. 21 is extremely unselfish and does all the little things well that add up. 33 has a very high shooting %, 5g vs GZ 4g vs GP. They all move the ball. Do you know what you’re looking for?

Assists, for starters. Shooters are a dime a dozen.

Bullis got their faceoff man back. They’ll be fine. Even with you counting their passes at home.

So not so much on the assists then. Next.

Terrible take on the game. I don’t care how tf my goals get scored. Never pass up a good shot. You’re def that loon helper dad counting passes can only go to the goal after 5.