The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Buurnnn . Unless the Cambridges give up the throne or buy a house in Montauk, neither of which is likely, they'll never win this war.

Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed in America had sympathy for Harry and Meghan; only 27 percent expressed sympathy for the senior members of the royal family. Only 12 percent of Britons say they had “a lot” of sympathy for Harry and Meghan. Thirty-three percent of Britons had no sympathy at all for the couple.

[Anonymous]

They could send George to Phillips Exeter. That would win them American support. Maybe even a coveted trade deal in 2022. Give us the little prince!

Oh and his great uncle too - the SDNY wants to talk to Andrew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Buurnnn . Unless the Cambridges give up the throne or buy a house in Montauk, neither of which is likely, they'll never win this war.

Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed in America had sympathy for Harry and Meghan; only 27 percent expressed sympathy for the senior members of the royal family. Only 12 percent of Britons say they had “a lot” of sympathy for Harry and Meghan. Thirty-three percent of Britons had no sympathy at all for the couple.

Why in the world would they care about being popular in the U.S.? It makes them look a little silly, to be honest. And, when the U.K. and the Commonwealth are at risk of fracturing, why put any energy into American popularity? It comes off as a bit dismissive of their own subjects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Buurnnn . Unless the Cambridges give up the throne or buy a house in Montauk, neither of which is likely, they'll never win this war.

Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed in America had sympathy for Harry and Meghan; only 27 percent expressed sympathy for the senior members of the royal family. Only 12 percent of Britons say they had “a lot” of sympathy for Harry and Meghan. Thirty-three percent of Britons had no sympathy at all for the couple.

Why in the world would they care about being popular in the U.S.? It makes them look a little silly, to be honest. And, when the U.K. and the Commonwealth are at risk of fracturing, why put any energy into American popularity? It comes off as a bit dismissive of their own subjects.

And I'll also add that, as an American, I will resent them if their visit stokes any more division in this country, regardless of their intentions. With racial and political tensions where they are right now, I'd rather they not try to bolster their own popularity at our expense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They clearly are going to try and prop her up and keep her working until they can get the platinum jubilee. It’s practically criminal that Will and Kate would even consider jetting off to America for an award show when the 94 y/o granny is still doing 300+ events a year.

The futures need to focus on their own country. Global work when you're doing the bare minimum at home is not a good look.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-anne-hardest-working-royal-21587734

After Brexit, relations with the US are even more vital to the UK.

And they clearly are leveraging their biggest asset, the star power couple. Time Joe hosted a state dinner, bring some glamour to the WH.

Joe honestly doesn’t seem that interested in them. Trump seemed very starstruck by the royals (perhaps because his mother was Scottish?) and they didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole.

Does not matter what Joe’s personal feelings are on the matter, as they say this is business.

Yep. Business. And a connection with UK royals, and indeed a trade deal with the island because of them, is low low low on the totem pole.

Yep, which is why our President made his first presidential foreign trip to the UK, and will have visited the island twice in less than five months. Also why a top diplomat like John Kerry is announcing US proud to host Earthshot.

Surely it will be a fantastic collaboration with global reach.

Correction: the calendar had the UK hosting the g7 summit . Biden didn't choose the UK as his first foreign trip because of any strategic importance. And even it were the case, royals have nothing to do with it —they have no political power .

Neither the American left nor thd right is eager to strike a trade deal with Britain, especially as there are unresolved issues with the good Friday agreement ( doubt you instantly know what it is) in Ireland. What's next ? Crediting the cambridges with helping strike the AUKUS deal ? Delusional much ?

First meeting with a foreign leader, B. Johnson, to sign a renewed version of the “Atlantic Charter”. I guess some of y’all can’t take hints. The Royals are state reps/diplomats of the UK, personal feelings are irrelevant.

The royals are only diplomats to someone who doesn't know that diplomacy is political too. And after the end of absolute monarchy , royals are forbidden from venturing into the political field , hence , the reason why you seldom hear them give public opinions on domestic matters , much less international ones.

It’s called soft power and the UK uses them to the greatest advantage. They do not need to take political stances to advocate on behalf of their country, plenty of common ground to be found.

Gotta love the delusions of Cambridge fans . They have no soft power and what exactly have they done on behalf of Britain that's been beneficial. Seems like you're taking your fantasies for reality .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They could send George to Phillips Exeter. That would win them American support. Maybe even a coveted trade deal in 2022. Give us the little prince!

Oh and his great uncle too - the SDNY wants to talk to Andrew.

I definitely agree with you about Andrew.
I wouldn’t wish Exeter on George — unless, of course, he has some special interest in attending. If he doesn’t do Eton or another British school, at least choose a US school that’s some place warm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They clearly are going to try and prop her up and keep her working until they can get the platinum jubilee. It’s practically criminal that Will and Kate would even consider jetting off to America for an award show when the 94 y/o granny is still doing 300+ events a year.

The futures need to focus on their own country. Global work when you're doing the bare minimum at home is not a good look.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-anne-hardest-working-royal-21587734

After Brexit, relations with the US are even more vital to the UK.

And they clearly are leveraging their biggest asset, the star power couple. Time Joe hosted a state dinner, bring some glamour to the WH.

Joe honestly doesn’t seem that interested in them. Trump seemed very starstruck by the royals (perhaps because his mother was Scottish?) and they didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole.

Does not matter what Joe’s personal feelings are on the matter, as they say this is business.

Yep. Business. And a connection with UK royals, and indeed a trade deal with the island because of them, is low low low on the totem pole.

Yep, which is why our President made his first presidential foreign trip to the UK, and will have visited the island twice in less than five months. Also why a top diplomat like John Kerry is announcing US proud to host Earthshot.

Surely it will be a fantastic collaboration with global reach.

Correction: the calendar had the UK hosting the g7 summit . Biden didn't choose the UK as his first foreign trip because of any strategic importance. And even it were the case, royals have nothing to do with it —they have no political power .

Neither the American left nor thd right is eager to strike a trade deal with Britain, especially as there are unresolved issues with the good Friday agreement ( doubt you instantly know what it is) in Ireland. What's next ? Crediting the cambridges with helping strike the AUKUS deal ? Delusional much ?

First meeting with a foreign leader, B. Johnson, to sign a renewed version of the “Atlantic Charter”. I guess some of y’all can’t take hints. The Royals are state reps/diplomats of the UK, personal feelings are irrelevant.

The royals are only diplomats to someone who doesn't know that diplomacy is political too. And after the end of absolute monarchy , royals are forbidden from venturing into the political field , hence , the reason why you seldom hear them give public opinions on domestic matters , much less international ones.

It’s called soft power and the UK uses them to the greatest advantage. They do not need to take political stances to advocate on behalf of their country, plenty of common ground to be found.

Gotta love the delusions of Cambridge fans . They have no soft power and what exactly have they done on behalf of Britain that's been beneficial. Seems like you're taking your fantasies for reality .

The delusions are all on your part that any of this means anything. It's people like you who keep the tabloids afloat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They need an intervention, she is not capable of doing the job anymore.

Ohhhh, an expert on Parliament’s Law of Settlement posting on a little mommy blog!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They could send George to Phillips Exeter. That would win them American support. Maybe even a coveted trade deal in 2022. Give us the little prince!

Oh and his great uncle too - the SDNY wants to talk to Andrew.

Doesn’t Exeter start in high school? George will already have been at boarding school for five years at that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They clearly are going to try and prop her up and keep her working until they can get the platinum jubilee. It’s practically criminal that Will and Kate would even consider jetting off to America for an award show when the 94 y/o granny is still doing 300+ events a year.

The futures need to focus on their own country. Global work when you're doing the bare minimum at home is not a good look.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-anne-hardest-working-royal-21587734

After Brexit, relations with the US are even more vital to the UK.

And they clearly are leveraging their biggest asset, the star power couple. Time Joe hosted a state dinner, bring some glamour to the WH.

Joe honestly doesn’t seem that interested in them. Trump seemed very starstruck by the royals (perhaps because his mother was Scottish?) and they didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole.

Does not matter what Joe’s personal feelings are on the matter, as they say this is business.

Yep. Business. And a connection with UK royals, and indeed a trade deal with the island because of them, is low low low on the totem pole.

Yep, which is why our President made his first presidential foreign trip to the UK, and will have visited the island twice in less than five months. Also why a top diplomat like John Kerry is announcing US proud to host Earthshot.

Surely it will be a fantastic collaboration with global reach.

Correction: the calendar had the UK hosting the g7 summit . Biden didn't choose the UK as his first foreign trip because of any strategic importance. And even it were the case, royals have nothing to do with it —they have no political power .

Neither the American left nor thd right is eager to strike a trade deal with Britain, especially as there are unresolved issues with the good Friday agreement ( doubt you instantly know what it is) in Ireland. What's next ? Crediting the cambridges with helping strike the AUKUS deal ? Delusional much ?

First meeting with a foreign leader, B. Johnson, to sign a renewed version of the “Atlantic Charter”. I guess some of y’all can’t take hints. The Royals are state reps/diplomats of the UK, personal feelings are irrelevant.

The royals are only diplomats to someone who doesn't know that diplomacy is political too. And after the end of absolute monarchy , royals are forbidden from venturing into the political field , hence , the reason why you seldom hear them give public opinions on domestic matters , much less international ones.

It’s called soft power and the UK uses them to the greatest advantage. They do not need to take political stances to advocate on behalf of their country, plenty of common ground to be found.

While I agree that the royals do use soft power I can’t think of any instance where anyone besides Queen Elizabeth has effectively done so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They could send George to Phillips Exeter. That would win them American support. Maybe even a coveted trade deal in 2022. Give us the little prince!

Oh and his great uncle too - the SDNY wants to talk to Andrew.

Why not send Charlotte?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They could send George to Phillips Exeter. That would win them American support. Maybe even a coveted trade deal in 2022. Give us the little prince!

Oh and his great uncle too - the SDNY wants to talk to Andrew.

I definitely agree with you about Andrew.
I wouldn’t wish Exeter on George — unless, of course, he has some special interest in attending. If he doesn’t do Eton or another British school, at least choose a US school that’s some place warm.

Kate brought some brain power into the family, particularly with math. George would do better at Tonbridge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They clearly are going to try and prop her up and keep her working until they can get the platinum jubilee. It’s practically criminal that Will and Kate would even consider jetting off to America for an award show when the 94 y/o granny is still doing 300+ events a year.

The futures need to focus on their own country. Global work when you're doing the bare minimum at home is not a good look.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-anne-hardest-working-royal-21587734

After Brexit, relations with the US are even more vital to the UK.

And they clearly are leveraging their biggest asset, the star power couple. Time Joe hosted a state dinner, bring some glamour to the WH.

Joe honestly doesn’t seem that interested in them. Trump seemed very starstruck by the royals (perhaps because his mother was Scottish?) and they didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole.

Does not matter what Joe’s personal feelings are on the matter, as they say this is business.

Yep. Business. And a connection with UK royals, and indeed a trade deal with the island because of them, is low low low on the totem pole.

Yep, which is why our President made his first presidential foreign trip to the UK, and will have visited the island twice in less than five months. Also why a top diplomat like John Kerry is announcing US proud to host Earthshot.

Surely it will be a fantastic collaboration with global reach.

Correction: the calendar had the UK hosting the g7 summit . Biden didn't choose the UK as his first foreign trip because of any strategic importance. And even it were the case, royals have nothing to do with it —they have no political power .

Neither the American left nor thd right is eager to strike a trade deal with Britain, especially as there are unresolved issues with the good Friday agreement ( doubt you instantly know what it is) in Ireland. What's next ? Crediting the cambridges with helping strike the AUKUS deal ? Delusional much ?

First meeting with a foreign leader, B. Johnson, to sign a renewed version of the “Atlantic Charter”. I guess some of y’all can’t take hints. The Royals are state reps/diplomats of the UK, personal feelings are irrelevant.

The royals are only diplomats to someone who doesn't know that diplomacy is political too. And after the end of absolute monarchy , royals are forbidden from venturing into the political field , hence , the reason why you seldom hear them give public opinions on domestic matters , much less international ones.

It’s called soft power and the UK uses them to the greatest advantage. They do not need to take political stances to advocate on behalf of their country, plenty of common ground to be found.

While I agree that the royals do use soft power I can’t think of any instance where anyone besides Queen Elizabeth has effectively done so.

Diana? I can think of a few possible issues, starting with changing the way AIDS patients were treated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the Cambridges went ahead with the splashy foreign magazine reveal and announcement they were going to the US during the hospitalization. If it had been the younger couple they would have been lambasted for being uncaring

They clearly are going to try and prop her up and keep her working until they can get the platinum jubilee. It’s practically criminal that Will and Kate would even consider jetting off to America for an award show when the 94 y/o granny is still doing 300+ events a year.

The futures need to focus on their own country. Global work when you're doing the bare minimum at home is not a good look.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/princess-anne-hardest-working-royal-21587734

After Brexit, relations with the US are even more vital to the UK.

And they clearly are leveraging their biggest asset, the star power couple. Time Joe hosted a state dinner, bring some glamour to the WH.

Joe honestly doesn’t seem that interested in them. Trump seemed very starstruck by the royals (perhaps because his mother was Scottish?) and they didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole.

Does not matter what Joe’s personal feelings are on the matter, as they say this is business.

Yep. Business. And a connection with UK royals, and indeed a trade deal with the island because of them, is low low low on the totem pole.

Yep, which is why our President made his first presidential foreign trip to the UK, and will have visited the island twice in less than five months. Also why a top diplomat like John Kerry is announcing US proud to host Earthshot.

Surely it will be a fantastic collaboration with global reach.

Correction: the calendar had the UK hosting the g7 summit . Biden didn't choose the UK as his first foreign trip because of any strategic importance. And even it were the case, royals have nothing to do with it —they have no political power .

Neither the American left nor thd right is eager to strike a trade deal with Britain, especially as there are unresolved issues with the good Friday agreement ( doubt you instantly know what it is) in Ireland. What's next ? Crediting the cambridges with helping strike the AUKUS deal ? Delusional much ?

First meeting with a foreign leader, B. Johnson, to sign a renewed version of the “Atlantic Charter”. I guess some of y’all can’t take hints. The Royals are state reps/diplomats of the UK, personal feelings are irrelevant.

The royals are only diplomats to someone who doesn't know that diplomacy is political too. And after the end of absolute monarchy , royals are forbidden from venturing into the political field , hence , the reason why you seldom hear them give public opinions on domestic matters , much less international ones.

It’s called soft power and the UK uses them to the greatest advantage. They do not need to take political stances to advocate on behalf of their country, plenty of common ground to be found.

While I agree that the royals do use soft power I can’t think of any instance where anyone besides Queen Elizabeth has effectively done so.

Diana? I can think of a few possible issues, starting with changing the way AIDS patients were treated.

Yeah but they fired her remember? Something about outshining the true heir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah but they fired her remember? Something about outshining the true heir.

Sounds a little familiar