Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
I’d say you know a lot about this Overton guy to not be Overton. Wonder how close you are to the situation |
Gawd. You guys are so funny. |
Why aren’t you exposing the white cheaters? |
White coaches don’t cheat. |
NP here. A lot of this is public (or at least has been widely shared). |
Are there other coaches bringing 30 something players to their programs that are zoned for the school? If so by all means bring them up. Lets go! Just like the OP said cheaters come in all colors so lets expose them... |
Oh so it’s a lot of rumors and third party information. |
OP here...Cite which one of the verifiable things that I wrote is a rumor. They've all been verified by multiple sources, in many cases PWPS, FCPS, the Commonwealth of VA., reputable news sources (I could go on for days). You Overton backers are pathetic. |
Cite the source of each allegation |
Got it, when you can't prove me wrong you sidestep. Overton supporters are beyod pathetic. |
You are the one making allegations, swearing they are facts, but have no sources. Interesting. |
| Shameful Hayfield is allowed to play. |
|
I think some if not a lot if not all of the Hayfield transfers came there to play football. Some of them may have been recruited, some actually may have an address where they don't actually reside.
My problem here is FCPS did not find anything and VHSL didn't do a thorough investigation so they are relying on 'this looks bad' to hold them accountable. VHSL neglected to actually act on their feelings and instead tried to take to the easy way out and prosecute Hayfield with sneak tactics (the timing) and rules they have in place, that they can't explain what they actually mean. (Spirit of the Game and Proselytizing Rule) The banning and the appeals were all heard by people and committee's appointed by VHSL. That was always going to end the way it did. Those sneak tactics backfired on VHSL big time once the Hayfield parents decided to be heard by a neutral party, the courts. You can't bring your feelings into a court room and more so you have to provide facts to substantiate your claims. I watched the judge ask the VHSL lawyer point blank question about their process and how it applied to Hayfield and the lawyer could not answer appropriately. Snippets from court that hurt VHSL: - VHSL lawyer says they aren't worried about the Spirit of the Game violation. The judge replies, well why are we here and why was this presented. - Judge asked the VHSL lawyer, what does Proselytizing Rule mean. VHSL lawyer responds, 'That's a good question'. - Judge tells the VHSL lawyer you've accused Hayfield of recruiting, I see nothing in your bylaws that defines recruiting. So what and how did they violate this? - Judge tells the VHSL lawyer that you mentioned a track violation that Hayfield self reported. What does that have to do with the football team and why didn't you suspend the track team? - Judge says to VHSL lawyer, you mentioned 31 students transferred from Freedom High School and 14 of them transferred to Hayfield. Where are the other 17? Have they been investigated? Are the schools they attending allowed to participate in the playoffs? The VHSL laywer responds (something to the effect), we have no idea. - Lastly and to me most detrimental to VHSL case. VHSL claims FCPS did not do enough in their investigation. Judge ask the lawyer, where is the proof you did any investigation at all. Have you interviewed parents? Have you interviewed students? Did you do residency checks? All to which the answer was NO. The Judge replied, so what did you do because FCPS has provided documentation that they've actually did all these things. - (this is what I think showed VHSL hand) VHSL told the judge, that Hayfield parents filing this emergency injunction at the last minute leaves them in a position to disrupt their playoffs. The judge replies, VHSL you decided to notify them with one week left in the season and they followed your appeals process to which they were officially disqualified on the last day of the regular season. The judge ripped this apart basically stating VHSL chose this path of timing. In my opinion, Overton seems like he's a great coach that has parents willing to make the sacrifice to continue to have their children coached by him. This doesn't seem like a situation where the kids even needed to be recruited by him. However I do 100% believe they more than likely cut corners and covered their tracks to get kids enrolled at Hayfield. In America's court, when you accused somebody of something as VHSL did, you actually have to have proof, which VHSL neglected to provide or in this case or even put forth effort. They relied strictly on back door meetings to punish Hayfield and it backfired. I said all this to say, Hayfield may not be clean, but the governing body VHSL severely dropped the ball on this. Additionally, I don't even know why they would attend another court date on Dec 4th. Their argument is 'Spirit of the Game' and ' Proselytizing' neither of which they can prove. There is no way Hayfield lawyer allows them to introduce any residency claims, any collusion and all the other stuff I've read on this forum that people think will be introduced. Simply put, none of that stuff applies to the claims at which VHSL decided to punish Hayfield. Remember they were not punished for having ineligible players, VHSL actually cleared them, so that's not a claim VHSL can now use. |
VERY well said ^^^^THIS 1000 X THIS ^^^^ |
No, I am restating facts, as presented by Fairfax Times, Inside NOVA and other reputable sources. And you, like all the other low-intelligence Overton supporters are feebly grasping at straws, deflecting, and making specious (look it up) claims. Standard playbook of someone who has no legs to stand on. Next up I assume you will falsely claim I am racist. God you guys are pathetic. |