Missing college student in the Dominican Republic from Ashburn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

Well they left her out on that red flag beach, super drunk and with a strange guy, didn’t they?? Either they didn’t care (probably), or they tried to get her to come with them and she refused (which wouldn’t be all that surprising either). Given that info, they are likely to magically change into ultra responsible friends just a few hours later.

not even a single social media post "❤️ you Sudiksha!" or whatever it is young women do these days to convey feelings of any kind

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people need to realize that nearly all parties involved (other than Ribe’s family) would like to see this blamed on foul play by Ribe.

It would make the girl’s family and friends feel better (this isn’t her fault, this isn’t the friends’ fault, it is HIS fault). Certainly the resort and the DR would like to see this pinned on him as well (DR is safe! This resort is safe! no fault of ours!). They don’t want any bad press, particularly considering their dependence on tourism.

Not saying Ribe couldn’t be guilty. Of course it is possible. But understand the circumstances of this at least.

The DR wantds it to be a drowning.

Didn't a few German tourists recently "drown" there same beach or nearby? Anyone know what German authorities found afterwards or any pending investigation in that incident?

People drown in the ocean. Especially at night. Rip currents and red flag warnings aren't as closely monitored at night because locals KNOW you don't swim in the ocean at night.

This is a tragic situation, but I haven't heard anything to show that this was other than bad decisions by drunk college students.

The German tourists didn't "drown" at night did they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people need to realize that nearly all parties involved (other than Ribe’s family) would like to see this blamed on foul play by Ribe.

It would make the girl’s family and friends feel better (this isn’t her fault, this isn’t the friends’ fault, it is HIS fault). Certainly the resort and the DR would like to see this pinned on him as well (DR is safe! This resort is safe! no fault of ours!). They don’t want any bad press, particularly considering their dependence on tourism.

Not saying Ribe couldn’t be guilty. Of course it is possible. But understand the circumstances of this at least.

The DR wantds it to be a drowning.

Didn't a few German tourists recently "drown" there same beach or nearby? Anyone know what German authorities found afterwards or any pending investigation in that incident?

People drown in the ocean. Especially at night. Rip currents and red flag warnings aren't as closely monitored at night because locals KNOW you don't swim in the ocean at night.

This is a tragic situation, but I haven't heard anything to show that this was other than bad decisions by drunk college students.

I read that normally there are security guards patrolling the beach at night and that swimming is prohibited (and that prohibition is enforced by such security guards). BUT because there was a power outage that particular night/early AM there was no security on the beach. Why, I don't know, but that was reason given.

[Anonymous]

The friends and other witnesses have spoken to LE, not trolls on the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

Well they left her out on that red flag beach, super drunk and with a strange guy, didn’t they?? Either they didn’t care (probably), or they tried to get her to come with them and she refused (which wouldn’t be all that surprising either). Given that info, they are likely to magically change into ultra responsible friends just a few hours later.

not even a single social media post "❤️ you Sudiksha!" or whatever it is young women do these days to convey feelings of any kind

some people don’t put every personal feeling on social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people need to realize that nearly all parties involved (other than Ribe’s family) would like to see this blamed on foul play by Ribe.

It would make the girl’s family and friends feel better (this isn’t her fault, this isn’t the friends’ fault, it is HIS fault). Certainly the resort and the DR would like to see this pinned on him as well (DR is safe! This resort is safe! no fault of ours!). They don’t want any bad press, particularly considering their dependence on tourism.

Not saying Ribe couldn’t be guilty. Of course it is possible. But understand the circumstances of this at least.

The DR wantds it to be a drowning.

Didn't a few German tourists recently "drown" there same beach or nearby? Anyone know what German authorities found afterwards or any pending investigation in that incident?

People drown in the ocean. Especially at night. Rip currents and red flag warnings aren't as closely monitored at night because locals KNOW you don't swim in the ocean at night.

This is a tragic situation, but I haven't heard anything to show that this was other than bad decisions by drunk college students.

The German tourists didn't "drown" at night did they?

no, they DROWNED in the ocean, at the same beach. Fact, no need for quotations.

Again the ocean is dangerous. Even strong swimmers drown, and that's without being intoxicated in the dark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

Per Ribe, her friend texted Carter Johnson looking for her. Since Ribe was not back at that point, they and CJ likely believed they were together. When Ribe returned alone and heard that the girl he says he had not seen for hours had not returned, at 10am he at least knew she was missing. We don’t know what he told CJ since he did not answer that LE question. We know he did not communicate that to friends, resort or LE. Friends had to deduce she was missing when returned at 4.

Why? Who benefits from delayed search? What was in his pocket that was not a phone or key?

All the detail about his arm on her neck could be trying to get a story out if she is found with bruising on her throat.

Why didnt CJ tell anyone she was missing at that point either? Would't both him and Ribe know at the same time she hadn't returned?

why didn't the actual FRIENDS act like they gave a single sh&t about Sudiksha before catching their excursion, with her?

[Anonymous]

What are the different versions of Riibes story? I heard he changed his story multiple times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

If they were responsible and of sound mind, they wouldn’t have left her in that situation in the first place. You really think anything would be different a few hours later?

For all we know, Sudiksha was the crazy friend who pulled sh!t like this all the time (wandering off with random guys etc). And would not listen to reason. Many of us had a friend like that in college. It may not have seemed particularly out of character.

Exactly the reason we should have heard much more from the girls, including one lifelong friend. They absolutely could have provided background info on Sudisksha that would be informative, if not helpful.

Omfg. YOU don't. The LE would have asked them whatever they think needs to be asked to find out about the missing person. Why don't you contact DR LE Attorney General to request that information if you are so interested in hearing about this young woman's character?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

Well they left her out on that red flag beach, super drunk and with a strange guy, didn’t they?? Either they didn’t care (probably), or they tried to get her to come with them and she refused (which wouldn’t be all that surprising either). Given that info, they are likely to magically change into ultra responsible friends just a few hours later.

not even a single social media post "❤️ you Sudiksha!" or whatever it is young women do these days to convey feelings of any kind

some people don’t put every personal feeling on social media.

So the girlfriends left Sudiksha at the beach, left her to take a day boat excursion, and then checked out and left the country with her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

If they were responsible and of sound mind, they wouldn’t have left her in that situation in the first place. You really think anything would be different a few hours later?

For all we know, Sudiksha was the crazy friend who pulled sh!t like this all the time (wandering off with random guys etc). And would not listen to reason. Many of us had a friend like that in college. It may not have seemed particularly out of character.

Exactly the reason we should have heard much more from the girls, including one lifelong friend. They absolutely could have provided background info on Sudisksha that would be informative, if not helpful.

Omfg. YOU don't. The LE would have asked them whatever they think needs to be asked to find out about the missing person. Why don't you contact DR LE Attorney General to request that information if you are so interested in hearing about this young woman's character?

ahh, there it is: the YOU poster. This poster knows everything but YOU know nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are the different versions of Riibes story? I heard he changed his story multiple times.

have we or is it just the fog of reporting from overseas ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

Well they left her out on that red flag beach, super drunk and with a strange guy, didn’t they?? Either they didn’t care (probably), or they tried to get her to come with them and she refused (which wouldn’t be all that surprising either). Given that info, they are likely to magically change into ultra responsible friends just a few hours later.

not even a single social media post "❤️ you Sudiksha!" or whatever it is young women do these days to convey feelings of any kind

some people don’t put every personal feeling on social media.

So the girlfriends left Sudiksha at the beach, left her to take a day boat excursion, and then checked out and left the country with her.

But let's now blame the drunk friend of the drunk dude who slept if off on the beach because that boat trip won't wait for us!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people are blaming the guy, and her friends, for not keeping close track of her (as if she were a child)- particularly when they too, were all drinking.

It was very very common in college for one of us to “go home with a guy” or “crash somewhere else” or whatever. In the AM people were either sleeping in, or had places to be. A person would not necessarily be missed until afternoon at the earliest. Which seemed to be the case here.

Now many could say “how terrible, so irresponsible!” and they would not be wrong. It IS irresponsible. And dangerous! But it is not uncommon behavior among partying college kids at all. Particularly if this activity is in a confined space like a college campus or resort (as opposed to going out to clubs etc or somewhere more unusual).

I think it is very understandable (and very believable) that no one realized she was missing until later in the day. They all thought she was with others and/or sleeping, and this would not really be considered unusual college behavior.

Yes but I think posters think the friends could have made sure she was definitely not going on the excursion (someone said Venmo history was released and she had Venmo her friend for the outing). When they heard the young man had not returned (not sure if that part matches timeline), they could have assumed that she was still with him.

I cannot imagine a scenario in which I do not check in with my friend to confirm she’s OK when she has spent multiple hours with a man She has only just met especially when she’s paid a large sum to go on this excursion. Nothing flagged in her friends heads that something was odd or off that she was hooking up with some random guy And missing out on the excursion?

You? Me? Yes of course. But them? They are foolish college girls, presumably running on a few hours sleep and probably very hungover. And didn’t want to miss the excursion they paid for, either. Odds are they woke up not long before the scheduled pickup time (not leaving a lot of extra time to search for their friend) and assumed she was with him and probably sleeping for a hangover. They had her phone so they couldn’t check with her to confirm. So they decided to go on the excursion (rather than be out $) and assumed she’d be there when they returned.

🤷🏻‍♀️ sure, last we saw Sudiksha she was super drunk with the drunk dude what's-his-name, at the red flag beach, at 5am. Oh, and we have her phone. Let's text other drunk dude and then hurry to meet up with our day boat. Else we'll lose our $24 excursion deposit.

If they were responsible and of sound mind, they wouldn’t have left her in that situation in the first place. You really think anything would be different a few hours later?

For all we know, Sudiksha was the crazy friend who pulled sh!t like this all the time (wandering off with random guys etc). And would not listen to reason. Many of us had a friend like that in college. It may not have seemed particularly out of character.

Exactly the reason we should have heard much more from the girls, including one lifelong friend. They absolutely could have provided background info on Sudisksha that would be informative, if not helpful.

Omfg. YOU don't. The LE would have asked them whatever they think needs to be asked to find out about the missing person. Why don't you contact DR LE Attorney General to request that information if you are so interested in hearing about this young woman's character?

At this point, wouldn't the same be said of Ribe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are the different versions of Riibes story? I heard he changed his story multiple times.

he did not