Anonymous wrote:I don't get articles like this. Nothing against SAHMS and the work they do, and I do think it sucks that alimony is less common now, when many SAHMS support their husband's career, but come on. Let's pretend we aren't moms and we are breaking this down: a single woman without kids ALSO does laundry, works out (so she get paid as a personal trainer), cooks, cleans, etc.
And as a WOHM and my husband, a WOHD, we do this stuff too - cooking, cleaning, laundry, errands, driving kids around. Yes, we outsource childcare during the day and we do outsource housecleaning once a month, but the rest of it we do.
I just think it is a silly way to value SAHMS. How about just acknowledging, it's hard work.
I agree with you to a point. Certain jobs, however, are almost impossible to perform without a SAH spouse. For example, a litigation partner at a big law firm or a principal at a major strategy consulting firm. When I was in IP litigation, every associate and partner with small to elementary school age children had a SAH spouse -- there was no way to do the job otherwise. If both spouses are in such demanding jobs, there is absolutely no time at all to do the cooking, cleaning, laundry, errands, driving kids around, etc. So, your hypothetical single woman can work and do SAH duties only if she is not in such a demanding job.
Let's not devalue SAHM just because your job allows for housework.
|