Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He pushes false claim after false claim in his dishonest "reporting" - https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/08/andy-ngo-right-wing-antifa-protest-portland-bigotry



map to json online

So legit news outlets say he’s legit? From your source?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.


+1 that’s his actual crime. He’s not on their side, and thus must be destroyed.


Journalists aren't supposed to be about "sides."
Thanks for re-affirming that Ngo is in fact a propagandist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He pushes false claim after false claim in his dishonest "reporting" - https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/08/andy-ngo-right-wing-antifa-protest-portland-bigotry



map to json online

So legit news outlets say he’s legit? From your source?


LOL they are being far too kind
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.


+1 that’s his actual crime. He’s not on their side, and thus must be destroyed.


Journalists aren't supposed to be about "sides."
Thanks for re-affirming that Ngo is in fact a propagandist.


You are trying to destroy him and attack him for investigating antifa, an org you support. Andy is not on your side. I don’t have expectations of him to do as I think he should, as you do. Gaslighter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He pushes false claim after false claim in his dishonest "reporting" - https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/08/andy-ngo-right-wing-antifa-protest-portland-bigotry



map to json online

So legit news outlets say he’s legit? From your source?


LOL they are being far too kind


Lol no they are being honest, or are they covering up for him? Is he fooling them too? Or perhaps they too support his web of terror. Accomplices. Omg.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.


Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.
Anonymous
It's amazing how fiercely defensive the right wing is of their fearmongering narratives and propaganda.

It's because they don't have anything positive to offer.

So instead they have to fearmonger and build up these bogeymen to get conservative voters afraid of "socialists" and "communists" and "anarchists" and whatever else.

Even to the point of "I bet some of the posters here are Antifa members!"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.


+1 that’s his actual crime. He’s not on their side, and thus must be destroyed.


Journalists aren't supposed to be about "sides."
Thanks for re-affirming that Ngo is in fact a propagandist.

Many do in fact have a "side," although most of them pretend they don't, which seems to fool those who already share their views.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.


Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.


I reported the thread. Can others PLEASE do the same.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.


Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.


I reported the thread. Can others PLEASE do the same.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/


Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.


Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.


I reported the thread. Can others PLEASE do the same.


+1


+100
It’s astonishing to see the blatant antifa apologists crawling out of their holes. At least they’re telling us (yet again) who they really are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.


That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.


Pretty much. I’m absolutely certain there are actual ANTIFA terrorists and ANTIFA terrorist-sympathizers here, posting regularly. They’re easy to spot - they’re the ones claiming ANTIFA doesn’t exist at all, or is merely “an idea”. This forum has at least a dozen of them, likely more.


Plus this thread about a guy most people probably don’t know about is being bumped to #1 for at least 2 days. Instant response, meaning someone or more than one person is monitoring it. And all the sources they use are far left news sources, if any. Complete troll thread.


I reported the thread. Can others PLEASE do the same.


+1


+100
It’s astonishing to see the blatant antifa apologists crawling out of their holes. At least they’re telling us (yet again) who they really are.


You guys are scary. You’re right-wingers, no one here is in Antifa or apologizing. It’s this bizarre, ineffectual trolling. Very creepy. Get your bs in now, as hopefully this entire thread will go away.

I also hope the kids can ban the guy who starts replied with “And,” as he admitted trolling on this thread, and that he is essentially always here. Get rid of this crap.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/


Oh, spare us. A leftist activist is lobbing unfounded criticism at Ngo? Color me shocked.


Unfounded? Clearly you did not read the article. It lays out quite a bit of specific detail - for example, that the way she found out she was on an Atomwaffen "kill list" was because she was contacted by law enforcement.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: