LMVSC town hall

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

They CCL glory for LMVSC only lasted 5 years. The new Technical Directors don't have the pull the old director has in this area, as far as knowing the community and understanding the players. I think just like Annandale United FC left CCL and we took their spot, it is also time for us to do the same and move on...


https://www.soccerwire.com/news/lee-mount-vernon-sc-joins-club-champions-league/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

They CCL glory for LMVSC only lasted 5 years. The new Technical Directors don't have the pull the old director has in this area, as far as knowing the community and understanding the players. I think just like Annandale United FC left CCL and we took their spot, it is also time for us to do the same and move on...


https://www.soccerwire.com/news/lee-mount-vernon-sc-joins-club-champions-league/

"At Lee-Mount Vernon Sports Club we are always looking to provide our players with the best environment possible to grow, and the Club Champions League provides just that." Interesting quote from Lula. Given our current CCL record, and several missing teams, maybe it's about about the best environment possible to grow. What is wrong with realigning ourselves in NCSL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s no point in trying. It’ll just end up being another year of over 2k gone.

+1

Exactly. I'll do what's best for my kid and my pocket. We're done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

They CCL glory for LMVSC only lasted 5 years. The new Technical Directors don't have the pull the old director has in this area, as far as knowing the community and understanding the players. I think just like Annandale United FC left CCL and we took their spot, it is also time for us to do the same and move on...


https://www.soccerwire.com/news/lee-mount-vernon-sc-joins-club-champions-league/

Stop with the CCL talk, the club is not going to give it up, that's the only thing that keeps them somehow relevant in the soccer community. No one talks abut Annandale anymore, right?
Just like BRYC on the boys side, always at the bottom of CCL and nothing ever changed, Players left on their own.

So right now your choice is suck it up or leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

Maybe you skipped this post:
Boys
02: last
03: 3rd from last
04: last (not in CCL)
05: 2nd from last
06: 8th (losing record)
07: first
08: 8th

Girls
02: last
03: 8th (losing record)
04: 2nd from last
05: 6th
06: no team
07: 2nd to last (not in CCL)
08: 2nd to last (no wins)

If not for COVID, there would one team with a winning record. Why are we in CCL? Let’s ease up the travel burden and gas/hotel costs.

Just because they have hit a tough time it does not mean that they can’t back to where they were. Having ccl could possibly attract talent.[b] Going ncsl only will not.

So basically, screw the kids that are still in the Club, let's keep CCL and hopefully attract some real talent then.

Didn't hear that during the "#LMVSCfamily" portion but sure feels like that sentiment coming from red team parents.

It has nothing to do with red, white or blue. It's just the reality of the soccer landscape. It's adding on to the talent that they already have. Some were complaining that red team was too hard for little susie and now you complain that other players would come and take the red spot away. You basically want to be on a "top" team but that plays at a lower level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

They CCL glory for LMVSC only lasted 5 years. The new Technical Directors don't have the pull the old director has in this area, as far as knowing the community and understanding the players. I think just like Annandale United FC left CCL and we took their spot, it is also time for us to do the same and move on...


https://www.soccerwire.com/news/lee-mount-vernon-sc-joins-club-champions-league/

Stop with the CCL talk, the club is not going to give it up, that's the only thing that keeps them somehow relevant in the soccer community. No one talks abut Annandale anymore, right?
Just like BRYC on the boys side, always at the bottom of CCL and nothing ever changed, Players left on their own.

So right now your choice is suck it up or leave.

Wow that was very transparent. "No one talks about Annandale anymore, right?" Why would we, parents of players, care if LMVSC was talked about? Honestly. We're paying for our kids to get developed and play soccer. We're not paid staff and therefore we do not care if people talk about us... which looks like that's the only thing you care about.

So who in the staff just wrote that comment? Lula? Jon? Lee? I'm pretty disgusted because it sure seems to be one of you. Coupling that with "Stop with the CCL talk" and "Suck it up or leave". Really shows your true colors. "Shut up and pay, or leave".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmvsc is NOT about to lose CCL. Stop whining and go to another club if you're not happy.

It took YEARS to get into CCL and they are not about to just throw it away with given time Lmvsc can be where it use to be but it takes time. The younger kids they have now will be good and will form new red teams
For now whoever is red just needs to take the punches and keep going forward

Maybe you skipped this post:
Boys
02: last
03: 3rd from last
04: last (not in CCL)
05: 2nd from last
06: 8th (losing record)
07: first
08: 8th

Girls
02: last
03: 8th (losing record)
04: 2nd from last
05: 6th
06: no team
07: 2nd to last (not in CCL)
08: 2nd to last (no wins)

If not for COVID, there would one team with a winning record. Why are we in CCL? Let’s ease up the travel burden and gas/hotel costs.

Just because they have hit a tough time it does not mean that they can’t back to where they were. Having ccl could possibly attract talent.[b] Going ncsl only will not.

So basically, screw the kids that are still in the Club, let's keep CCL and hopefully attract some real talent then.

Didn't hear that during the "#LMVSCfamily" portion but sure feels like that sentiment coming from red team parents.

It has nothing to do with red, white or blue. It's just the reality of the soccer landscape. It's adding on to the talent that they already have. Some were complaining that red team was too hard for little susie and now you complain that other players would come and take the red spot away. You basically want to be on a "top" team but that plays at a lower level.

Look again. Our top teams are at the bottom of lower levels. But looks like "suck it up or leave" is the way to go.

[Anonymous]

Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

I would think it would be the team fee for the squad that our DS/DD would be assigned to. Squad/team is all the same as before. The main difference I see in this whole thing is the training at the same time. You still have your team coach as always as will mostly participate in games/tournaments with that team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

I would think it would be the team fee for the squad that our DS/DD would be assigned to. Squad/team is all the same as before. The main difference I see in this whole thing is the training at the same time. You still have your team coach as always as will mostly participate in games/tournaments with that team.

No, only a “core group” (they said 6-7) would stay red squad. That’s why I asked a question during townhall but it never got addressed. I’m assuming there won’t be much movement at all.

[Anonymous]

"Suck it up or leave"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

I would think it would be the team fee for the squad that our DS/DD would be assigned to. Squad/team is all the same as before. The main difference I see in this whole thing is the training at the same time. You still have your team coach as always as will mostly participate in games/tournaments with that team.

No, only a “core group” (they said 6-7) would stay red squad. That’s why I asked a question during townhall but it never got addressed. I’m assuming there won’t be much movement at all.

Thank you for taking time to ask questions, people are complaining here but I didn't see anyone asking questions... has anyone send them an email at least? I did and I'm waiting for a response even if it's a marketing strategy or a genetic response. I'll post once I hear back from them...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

I would think it would be the team fee for the squad that our DS/DD would be assigned to. Squad/team is all the same as before. The main difference I see in this whole thing is the training at the same time. You still have your team coach as always as will mostly participate in games/tournaments with that team.

No, only a “core group” (they said 6-7) would stay red squad. That’s why I asked a question during townhall but it never got addressed. I’m assuming there won’t be much movement at all.

Thank you for taking time to ask questions, people are complaining here but I didn't see anyone asking questions... has anyone send them an email at least? I did and I'm waiting for a response even if it's a marketing strategy or a genetic response. I'll post once I hear back from them...

“Why don’t we just realign in NCSL” was surely a question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
"Suck it up or leave"

This is type of person that continuously comes on here and says this. Definitely not with the club and just trying to make it difficult for those trying to understand what is going on. These exist in all threads. I wouldn't take any of these comments too seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anybody receive an answer on how team fees will work? If we’re in academy and then assigned “squads”, what fee do I have to pay? Yes I am assuming there will be two teams in an age group.

I would think it would be the team fee for the squad that our DS/DD would be assigned to. Squad/team is all the same as before. The main difference I see in this whole thing is the training at the same time. You still have your team coach as always as will mostly participate in games/tournaments with that team.

No, only a “core group” (they said 6-7) would stay red squad. That’s why I asked a question during townhall but it never got addressed. I’m assuming there won’t be much movement at all.

Thank you for taking time to ask questions, people are complaining here but I didn't see anyone asking questions... has anyone send them an email at least? I did and I'm waiting for a response even if it's a marketing strategy or a genetic response. I'll post once I hear back from them...

“Why don’t we just realign in NCSL” was surely a question.

You asked that at the town hall or here?