new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Still waiting for you to provide a quote to support this. You've been asked by several people.

LISTEN to all women. Don't necessarily believe 100% of them, that's not realistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah... this doesn’t help her credibility.

Or anyone believing her. WTAF?!

How would those texts be relevant in an alleged sexual assault case? They are free speech political viewpoints.

They’re not. They have nothing to do with her rape accusation. And I remember a certain someone who had ultra-liberal views, and Democrats insisted those views had *nothing* to do with her (flimsy) allegation. So fun how the goalposts move depending on who’s being accused.

Oh, but they do. Like Kimberly Guilfoyle seems to have been po$$e$$ed by $omething that ha$ made her change her tune, so too has Reade.

This definitely feels like butteremails again. Or like project “veritas.” A political hatchet job, in other words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d want to interview the three interns Tara Reade had been supervising, before she was suddenly demoted into isolation.

Has this been brought up? Sp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

It was less than two years ago that conservatives were saying... "presumption of innocence." And, we heard back "Believe all women. We believe survivors."
I, for one, am thrilled that liberals have suddenly discovered due process.

October, 2018 - Senate offices....

[Anonymous]

Biden is toast.

What self-respecting woman would ruin their political career by agreeing to be his running mate. The whole election cycle would be the Veep candidate trying to defend Biden against this sexual assault claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Still waiting for you to provide a quote to support this. You've been asked by several people.

LISTEN to all women. Don't necessarily believe 100% of them, that's not realistic.

No caveat in Mazie Hirono's statement...she said that not only do they need to be heard, they need to be believed.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

[Anonymous]

Business Insider: "Here are all the times Joe Biden has been accused of acting inappropriately toward women and girls"

In May 2019, Biden told a 10-year-old girl, "I bet you're as bright as you are good-looking."

https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6#vail-kohnert-yount-a-former-white-house-intern-told-the-post-that-when-she-met-biden-in-2013-he-put-his-hand-on-the-back-of-my-head-and-pressed-his-forehead-to-my-forehead-kohnert-yount-also-said-biden-called-her-a-pretty-girl-7

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Still waiting for you to provide a quote to support this. You've been asked by several people.

LISTEN to all women. Don't necessarily believe 100% of them, that's not realistic.

No caveat in Mazie Hirono's statement...she said that not only do they need to be heard, they need to be believed.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

She also said to men... "Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change.”
She has been suspiciously quiet lately.

[Anonymous]

How is it right now one candidate who denied an allegation of sexual assault is a bigger story today than his opponent who admitted to regularly sexually assaulting women. He likes to “grab them be the pussy”. What is the standard here. Ask Trump today if he still likes it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden is toast.

What self-respecting woman would ruin their political career by agreeing to be his running mate. The whole election cycle would be the Veep candidate trying to defend Biden against this sexual assault claim.

Didn’t hurt Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Business Insider: "Here are all the times Joe Biden has been accused of acting inappropriately toward women and girls"

In May 2019, Biden told a 10-year-old girl, "I bet you're as bright as you are good-looking."

https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6#vail-kohnert-yount-a-former-white-house-intern-told-the-post-that-when-she-met-biden-in-2013-he-put-his-hand-on-the-back-of-my-head-and-pressed-his-forehead-to-my-forehead-kohnert-yount-also-said-biden-called-her-a-pretty-girl-7

This is gross. Also gross--Trump on his 16 year old daughter: "Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-creepiest-most-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it right now one candidate who denied an allegation of sexual assault is a bigger story today than his opponent who admitted to regularly sexually assaulting women. He likes to “grab them be the pussy”. What is the standard here. Ask Trump today if he still likes it

Yep.

Which tells you this is absolutely is a political hit and not at all about "believing women"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it right now one candidate who denied an allegation of sexual assault is a bigger story today than his opponent who admitted to regularly sexually assaulting women. He likes to “grab them be the pussy”. What is the standard here. Ask Trump today if he still likes it

We've got 6 months until November. Plenty of time to refocus on the serial molester. Let's do it!

Tara Reade is really a losing strategy for the GOP....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

I'm from that generation and I remember thigh highs. Don't you? They were all the rage,
Any plenty of women have worn stockings with a garter versus actual pantyhose. Some do for health reasons.

Not in the early 90s

Yes, in the early 90s. My mother bought them for me. Who they hell are you to speak for all women and products?

Did you work on Capitol Hill? No? Then you're irrelevant.

Yes, for my Ohio congressman before going to nonprofit. Why keep insulting me? What’s wrong with you? Issue is dead — Tara Reade says she was not wearing pantyhose due to warm spring weather. You are weirdly aggressive on what type of pantyhose women wore.

You would have to believe her. I don't.

Anybody who has looked at the whole of her past, especially her tweets, can't consider her credible. She has an ax to grind.

Did you read about the nonprofit she allegedly stole from? The owner has receipts and proof.

Medium has a good, short piece on the whole stealing-from-the-nonprofit thing.

https://medium.com/@eddiekrassenstein/biden-accuser-tara-reade-allegedly-stole-from-a-non-profit-organization-e276cac68a2b

From the feminist who runs the nonprofit: "Look, this isn’t about protecting women,” says Hummer. “This isn’t about the #metoo movement. This isn’t about Joe Biden.. This is about truth. Tara Reade stole from me. She lied to me. She stole from my organization. She manipulated me and she duped me. I want that to be shared because it’s important information. And I have documentation, images and emails to prove it.”

How can anybody read this account of Tara at the not-for-profit horse farm and not wonder about Tara's veracity even a tiny bit? She charged her own $1,400 vet bill to the not-for-profit and the CEO has the receipts. She stole and hid items from the org's charity raffle. The CEO says she felt Tara was constantly manipulating her.