new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Oh yeah.

Yup. Nothing like the smell of desperation on a Friday afternoon.

Reminds me of something... can't quite put my finger on it...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#believesomewomen

You’re stupid to think supporting women and those speaking out in the MeToo moment means every woman is by default talking the truth. You think we can’t see through people attempting to manipulate the system? There are false accusers on the left, right and middle. Whataboutism is old and makes you look incompetent, unable to truly discuss why someone that supports Russia, that lied multiple times, that changes her story as often as other liars do, should be trusted. You can support women and not suooort corruption and liars.. For example, I believe some Michael Jackson accusers, and I believe a few others jumped on the bandwagon for money.

Only Trumpters denominate a valid substantiated position to a left field and inaccurate conclusion that not believing Tara Reid means you don’t support all women in the time of a #MeToo movement.

Sure, sure. And the next time a Republican is accused, he'll get the witch hunt treatment, complete with fawning over whoever the accuser happens to be - for no reason other than she accused a Republican. While the next time a Democrat is accused, he'll get a pass because you'll insist his accuser "isn't credible." You know it, I know it - we all know this. Stop pretending.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden doesn't need Bernie voters to win, and women showed in the last election that they don't care about even credible allegations.

Republicans are panicking because they are definitely going to lose the Senate and very very likely going to lose the presidential election. So they're on this tip now. They're slimeballs who have no credibility. And if you support them, so are you.

On the contrary, Republicans aren't panicking. But if you think they're going to let the disgusting Democrat double standard slide by without pointing out the HUGE hypocrisy, you're sadly mistaken. Remember what you did to BK. We certainly do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Nope. I suspect a lot of desperation on your part, trying to make this accusation just go away. Not happening.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

It was less than two years ago that conservatives were saying... "presumption of innocence." And, we heard back "Believe all women. We believe survivors."
I, for one, am thrilled that liberals have suddenly discovered due process.

October, 2018 - Senate offices....

Just imagine how Tara feels, especially considering the fact that she’s lifelong DEVOUT Democrat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

Yes she did. Yes indeed. She also stayed silent in the face Daniel Inouye's (D) sexual assault allegations. I wonder why on earth that could be?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

Yes she did. Yes indeed. She also stayed silent in the face Daniel Inouye's (D) sexual assault allegations. I wonder why on earth that could be?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

It's hilarious how Trumpkins care about sexual abuse all of a sudden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#believesomewomen

You’re stupid to think supporting women and those speaking out in the MeToo moment means every woman is by default talking the truth. You think we can’t see through people attempting to manipulate the system? There are false accusers on the left, right and middle. Whataboutism is old and makes you look incompetent, unable to truly discuss why someone that supports Russia, that lied multiple times, that changes her story as often as other liars do, should be trusted. You can support women and not suooort corruption and liars.. For example, I believe some Michael Jackson accusers, and I believe a few others jumped on the bandwagon for money.

Only Trumpters denominate a valid substantiated position to a left field and inaccurate conclusion that not believing Tara Reid means you don’t support all women in the time of a #MeToo movement.

Sure, sure. And the next time a Republican is accused, he'll get the witch hunt treatment, complete with fawning over whoever the accuser happens to be - for no reason other than she accused a Republican. While the next time a Democrat is accused, he'll get a pass because you'll insist his accuser "isn't credible." You know it, I know it - we all know this. Stop pretending.

Witch hunt? Oh yeah?

Donnie has two dozen accusations, probably more, against him. He's on tape saying he grabs women by the pu$$y and they can't do anything about it because he's famous.

And yet, the centrist and liberal media are focussed on issues like COVID and Iran, go figure.

Stop pretending Trump and others of your party are the victims here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry cons, but it doesn't matter. Trump is a piggish boor and no self-respecting woman will cast a vote for him.

Meanwhile, Joe will be running with a woman as his VP. And Joe has stuck his neck out for women time and again. He's pushing pro-woman policies, like paid maternity leave and the ERA.

Joe has a flimsy allegation hanging over his head. Any man who has been in politics for 40+ years will probably have a similar person with a flimsy allegation. C'est la vie.

It's really not a hard choice for Democrats and self-respecting women in 2020. Everyone expects this rat-f#ckery from Republicans.

I totally agree. It’s tiresome to go through this and depressing to see the rat-f-ing work. Given that the R is Trump, why are we having this conversation at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

It was less than two years ago that conservatives were saying... "presumption of innocence." And, we heard back "Believe all women. We believe survivors."
I, for one, am thrilled that liberals have suddenly discovered due process.

October, 2018 - Senate offices....

Just imagine how Tara feels, especially considering the fact that she’s lifelong DEVOUT Democrat.

It’s a political party, not a religion. Sheesh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

Yes she did. Yes indeed. She also stayed silent in the face Daniel Inouye's (D) sexual assault allegations. I wonder why on earth that could be?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

It's hilarious how Trumpkins care about sexual abuse all of a sudden.

What’s hilarious is the grotesque double standard Democrats employ at every opportunity.

Are you saying that Republicans are consistent all the time? Like on moral issues such as infidelity, etc, and would never support a politician who didn’t embody their standards? OR are you saying that Republicans are hypocrites about hypocrisy and apply double standards to accusations of double standards??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

It was less than two years ago that conservatives were saying... "presumption of innocence." And, we heard back "Believe all women. We believe survivors."
I, for one, am thrilled that liberals have suddenly discovered due process.

October, 2018 - Senate offices....

Just imagine how Tara feels, especially considering the fact that she’s lifelong DEVOUT Democrat.

It’s a political party, not a religion. Sheesh.

+1. So some staffers put some signs in windows. Hardly represents the Dem party.

[Anonymous]

Tara’s neighbor, one of her “corroborating witnesses,” is now “struggling with it.”

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

1. The accuser appears less than perfectly credible and mentally stable, which hurts her. Lots of such women have been sexually assaulted, so this does not automatically rule out her claim!

2. Biden has the reputation of being handsy, not rapey. There is a significant difference. Note that Trump has been accused by multiple people of assault, including by an ex-wife, who accused him of rape then backtracked and settled. I admit I don't really believe the Biden accuser, and I feel bad about it, but... something doesn't ring true, as it did for the recent accuser of the Supreme Court nominee, who IS a credible, intelligent, balanced professional woman.

3. Ultimally, this might keep some voters home who would otherwise have voted for Biden, so yes, it hurts his Presidential chances. And to that point...

4. I CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY BIDEN IS THE DEM NOMINEE! He's in cognitive decline, was never competent to being with, and with his handsy reputation, he was bound to have someone come out to accuse him (sincerely or not).