2017-2018 PARCC results

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


There are barely any black students in any of these schools and out of those there are barely any that are at-risk. You are talking about a handful of kids in each grade max. It's impossible to make any kind of logical conclusions with such a small sample size. Also agree with pp that data is questionable. There aren't more than 10 black students in most of those categories listed I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though what is the source for the data


Source is OSSE excel list. Have to have 10+ students to get %.


I'm in the detailed 2018 Parcc performance results excel file and the only way I am getting more than 10 black students for actual data is by combining all black students in 3rd 4th and 5th grade.

There are only 14 test results in 3rd 4th and 5th grade total. For those 14 kids the scores are impressive Math is 1 level 2, 1 level 3, 10 level 4s and 1 level 5. and ELA is similar, hwoever there are less than 10 at-risk kids in the whole school. So these scores really aren't that surprising to me.

Also for reference there were only 29 white test takers and their scores are similarly high for math 2 level 2s, 2 level 3s, 15 level 4s and 10 level 5s


The point is, even with alll things being equal with SES, there is usually a large gap with white and black in DC. There is no gap at Ross. To PP, this is not an anomaly, Ross is usually this way. Stoddert and Eaton do pretty well also.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


Maybe small schools with high SES is the secret sauce. Ross only had 12 5th grade test takers.


Yup everything goes back to SES levels if I was black I wouldn't want to be a super minority so there is some value in all these posts.

Again to me KIPP and Ketcham are the real stories with scores way above expected based on SES /at-risk levels.

And finally if you are high SES/typical DCUM person your kid is going to most likely be successful whatever school they go to period.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


There are barely any black students in any of these schools and out of those there are barely any that are at-risk. You are talking about a handful of kids in each grade max. It's impossible to make any kind of logical conclusions with such a small sample size. Also agree with pp that data is questionable. There aren't more than 10 black students in most of those categories listed I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though what is the source for the data


Source is OSSE excel list. Have to have 10+ students to get %.


I'm in the detailed 2018 Parcc performance results excel file and the only way I am getting more than 10 black students for actual data is by combining all black students in 3rd 4th and 5th grade.

There are only 14 test results in 3rd 4th and 5th grade total. For those 14 kids the scores are impressive Math is 1 level 2, 1 level 3, 10 level 4s and 1 level 5. and ELA is similar, hwoever there are less than 10 at-risk kids in the whole school. So these scores really aren't that surprising to me.

Also for reference there were only 29 white test takers and their scores are similarly high for math 2 level 2s, 2 level 3s, 15 level 4s and 10 level 5s


The point is, even with alll things being equal with SES, there is usually a large gap with white and black in DC. There is no gap at Ross. To PP, this is not an anomaly, Ross is usually this way. Stoddert and Eaton do pretty well also.


Source? I’ve heard of a small gap at nationwide as you’ve described, but never knew this had been examined before in DC.
Anonymous
yes DC has a huge achievement gap. Discussed at length in the Post story on PARCC (this year and every year before it), discussed by all the officials at the news conference releasing the results.

City-wide proficiency

All students / all grades - 33 ELA/29 Math
Asian 72/70
Black 25/21
Hisp/Latino 32/28
White 82/79
API/native Hawaiian 52/35
2 or more races 66/62

You can see the racial breakdown for every school in the city with more than 10 students in any given subgroup at results.osse.dc.gov Scroll down the page
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:yes DC has a huge achievement gap. Discussed at length in the Post story on PARCC (this year and every year before it), discussed by all the officials at the news conference releasing the results.

City-wide proficiency

All students / all grades - 33 ELA/29 Math
Asian 72/70
Black 25/21
Hisp/Latino 32/28
White 82/79
API/native Hawaiian 52/35
2 or more races 66/62

You can see the racial breakdown for every school in the city with more than 10 students in any given subgroup at results.osse.dc.gov Scroll down the page


Sure, but a PP said there is a large gap in scores “all things being equal with SES,” which is impossible to know because there are vast SES differences between white and black students in DC, and we don’t know the SES of any particular black families from the data we have.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:yes DC has a huge achievement gap. Discussed at length in the Post story on PARCC (this year and every year before it), discussed by all the officials at the news conference releasing the results.

City-wide proficiency

All students / all grades - 33 ELA/29 Math
Asian 72/70
Black 25/21
Hisp/Latino 32/28
White 82/79
API/native Hawaiian 52/35
2 or more races 66/62

You can see the racial breakdown for every school in the city with more than 10 students in any given subgroup at results.osse.dc.gov Scroll down the page


Sure, but a PP said there is a large gap in scores “all things being equal with SES,” which is impossible to know because there are vast SES differences between white and black students in DC, and we don’t know the SES of any particular black families from the data we have.


We don’t. But we know a few things - 68.8 students in District public schools (DCPS and charters) are black, 18% Latinx, 10% white.

80% are economically disadvantaged, 10% are ELLs, 15% have disabilities requiring special education.

Personally I am far more concerned with what is working for kids who are at risk and economically disadvantaged than what is working for high SES students (of any race) because there are so many more high need kids.




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:yes DC has a huge achievement gap. Discussed at length in the Post story on PARCC (this year and every year before it), discussed by all the officials at the news conference releasing the results.

City-wide proficiency

All students / all grades - 33 ELA/29 Math
Asian 72/70
Black 25/21
Hisp/Latino 32/28
White 82/79
API/native Hawaiian 52/35
2 or more races 66/62

You can see the racial breakdown for every school in the city with more than 10 students in any given subgroup at results.osse.dc.gov Scroll down the page


Sure, but a PP said there is a large gap in scores “all things being equal with SES,” which is impossible to know because there are vast SES differences between white and black students in DC, and we don’t know the SES of any particular black families from the data we have.


We don’t. But we know a few things - 68.8 students in District public schools (DCPS and charters) are black, 18% Latinx, 10% white.

80% are economically disadvantaged, 10% are ELLs, 15% have disabilities requiring special education.

Personally I am far more concerned with what is working for kids who are at risk and economically disadvantaged than what is working for high SES students (of any race) because there are so many more high need kids.






Your Welcome

https://empowerk12.org/bold-improvement-schools

The whole website is great including a much better way to view PARCC data visually

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:yes DC has a huge achievement gap. Discussed at length in the Post story on PARCC (this year and every year before it), discussed by all the officials at the news conference releasing the results.

City-wide proficiency

All students / all grades - 33 ELA/29 Math
Asian 72/70
Black 25/21
Hisp/Latino 32/28
White 82/79
API/native Hawaiian 52/35
2 or more races 66/62

You can see the racial breakdown for every school in the city with more than 10 students in any given subgroup at results.osse.dc.gov Scroll down the page


Sure, but a PP said there is a large gap in scores “all things being equal with SES,” which is impossible to know because there are vast SES differences between white and black students in DC, and we don’t know the SES of any particular black families from the data we have.


We don’t. But we know a few things - 68.8 students in District public schools (DCPS and charters) are black, 18% Latinx, 10% white.

80% are economically disadvantaged, 10% are ELLs, 15% have disabilities requiring special education.

Personally I am far more concerned with what is working for kids who are at risk and economically disadvantaged than what is working for high SES students (of any race) because there are so many more high need kids.






I can see your point but public schools should meet the needs of all kids and if they do not then don't get mad when they do not want to stay in public schools and say attend charter schools, private schools, or homeschool.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


There are barely any black students in any of these schools and out of those there are barely any that are at-risk. You are talking about a handful of kids in each grade max. It's impossible to make any kind of logical conclusions with such a small sample size. Also agree with pp that data is questionable. There aren't more than 10 black students in most of those categories listed I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though what is the source for the data


Source is OSSE excel list. Have to have 10+ students to get %.


I'm in the detailed 2018 Parcc performance results excel file and the only way I am getting more than 10 black students for actual data is by combining all black students in 3rd 4th and 5th grade.

There are only 14 test results in 3rd 4th and 5th grade total. For those 14 kids the scores are impressive Math is 1 level 2, 1 level 3, 10 level 4s and 1 level 5. and ELA is similar, hwoever there are less than 10 at-risk kids in the whole school. So these scores really aren't that surprising to me.

Also for reference there were only 29 white test takers and their scores are similarly high for math 2 level 2s, 2 level 3s, 15 level 4s and 10 level 5s


The point is, even with alll things being equal with SES, there is usually a large gap with white and black in DC. There is no gap at Ross. To PP, this is not an anomaly, Ross is usually this way. Stoddert and Eaton do pretty well also.


Source? I’ve heard of a small gap at nationwide as you’ve described, but never knew this had been examined before in DC.


You don't need a source. You can look at individual schools with near-nonexistent FARM levels and compare those schools black and white performance.

Example:
Janney
7 low income students (1%)
36 AA students (5%)
White performance Math 89%
Black performance Math 38%
White ELA 83%
Black ELA 55%

Janney's test scores are higher for their SPED (42/42%) and ELL (56/69%) than their black students (80% of which are non low income - this is a silly assumption that all 7 of their low income students are AA).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.


You don't need a source. You can look at individual schools with near-nonexistent FARM levels and compare those schools black and white performance.

Example:
Janney
7 low income students (1%)
36 AA students (5%)
White performance Math 89%
Black performance Math 38%
White ELA 83%
Black ELA 55%

Janney's test scores are higher for their SPED (42/42%) and ELL (56/69%) than their black students (80% of which are non low income - this is a silly assumption that all 7 of their low income students are AA).


Except this assumes that all the low-income and/or minority students are in the testing grades. The enrollment covers Pk4-5th. Only 3rd-5th graders take PARCC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


There are barely any black students in any of these schools and out of those there are barely any that are at-risk. You are talking about a handful of kids in each grade max. It's impossible to make any kind of logical conclusions with such a small sample size. Also agree with pp that data is questionable. There aren't more than 10 black students in most of those categories listed I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though what is the source for the data


Source is OSSE excel list. Have to have 10+ students to get %.


I'm in the detailed 2018 Parcc performance results excel file and the only way I am getting more than 10 black students for actual data is by combining all black students in 3rd 4th and 5th grade.

There are only 14 test results in 3rd 4th and 5th grade total. For those 14 kids the scores are impressive Math is 1 level 2, 1 level 3, 10 level 4s and 1 level 5. and ELA is similar, hwoever there are less than 10 at-risk kids in the whole school. So these scores really aren't that surprising to me.

Also for reference there were only 29 white test takers and their scores are similarly high for math 2 level 2s, 2 level 3s, 15 level 4s and 10 level 5s


The point is, even with alll things being equal with SES, there is usually a large gap with white and black in DC. There is no gap at Ross. To PP, this is not an anomaly, Ross is usually this way. Stoddert and Eaton do pretty well also.


Source? I’ve heard of a small gap at nationwide as you’ve described, but never knew this had been examined before in DC.


You don't need a source. You can look at individual schools with near-nonexistent FARM levels and compare those schools black and white performance.

Example:
Janney
7 low income students (1%)
36 AA students (5%)
White performance Math 89%
Black performance Math 38%
White ELA 83%
Black ELA 55%

Janney's test scores are higher for their SPED (42/42%) and ELL (56/69%) than their black students (80% of which are non low income - this is a silly assumption that all 7 of their low income students are AA).


Looking at schools with very low FARMS levels is not the same thing as *controlling* for SES. Even if they’renot FARMs I would bet you money that those AA kids are not nearly as affluent as the average white kids at Janney—maybe a couple, but not most.



Anonymous
Good story for those of us who are far removed for the lives of at-risk students in DC. Feature on a student who improved 4 grade levels in a year, but is still behind according to PARCC

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/it-feels-great-to-go-back-the-districts-students-return-to-school/2018/08/20/e2d4f528-a491-11e8-8fac-12e98c13528d_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.22b4f399c4e7
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. Ross is certainly doing something right. Ross has nearly as many black student test takers as Mann and Key.

Black Students score 3+ ELA
Brent 54.5%
Eaton 85.7%
Hearst 78%
Janney 79.3%
Key 78.3%
Lafayette 76.6%
Mann 95.7%
Murch 61%
Ross 100%
Shepherd 76.9%

Black Students score 4+ ELA
Brent 30.3%
Eaton 53.6%
Hearst 46%
Janney 55.2%
Key 60.0%
Lafayette 53.2%
Mann 69.6%
Murch 36.6%
Ross 85.7%
Shepherd 51.3%

Black Students score 5+ ELA
Brent 0.00%
Eaton 10.7%
Hearst 0.00%
Janney 6.9%
Key 8.7%
Lafayette 6.4%
Mann 8.7%
Murch 0.00%
Ross 28.6%
Shepherd 7.7%


It's hard to say this conclusively without more info (which I guess isn't directly available). It could just be that Ross has more high-SES black students than the other schools.


No. Why try to find a reason to not acknowledge Ross is doing a stellar job?


Why the defensiveness? This is my first comment, and I'm just wondering whether there could be another explanation. I tend to think that demographics are more important than teaching styles/strategies when predicting student outcomes. I'm genuinely curious whether the demographics of black students might be different at Ross vs. the other schools named. Nothing against Ross at all, and I'm happy that the AA students there are doing well (I'm AA myself and live IB for one of the other schools on the list).


There are barely any black students in any of these schools and out of those there are barely any that are at-risk. You are talking about a handful of kids in each grade max. It's impossible to make any kind of logical conclusions with such a small sample size. Also agree with pp that data is questionable. There aren't more than 10 black students in most of those categories listed I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though what is the source for the data


Source is OSSE excel list. Have to have 10+ students to get %.


I'm in the detailed 2018 Parcc performance results excel file and the only way I am getting more than 10 black students for actual data is by combining all black students in 3rd 4th and 5th grade.

There are only 14 test results in 3rd 4th and 5th grade total. For those 14 kids the scores are impressive Math is 1 level 2, 1 level 3, 10 level 4s and 1 level 5. and ELA is similar, hwoever there are less than 10 at-risk kids in the whole school. So these scores really aren't that surprising to me.

Also for reference there were only 29 white test takers and their scores are similarly high for math 2 level 2s, 2 level 3s, 15 level 4s and 10 level 5s


The point is, even with alll things being equal with SES, there is usually a large gap with white and black in DC. There is no gap at Ross. To PP, this is not an anomaly, Ross is usually this way. Stoddert and Eaton do pretty well also.


Source? I’ve heard of a small gap at nationwide as you’ve described, but never knew this had been examined before in DC.


You don't need a source. You can look at individual schools with near-nonexistent FARM levels and compare those schools black and white performance.

Example:
Janney
7 low income students (1%)
36 AA students (5%)
White performance Math 89%
Black performance Math 38%
White ELA 83%
Black ELA 55%

Janney's test scores are higher for their SPED (42/42%) and ELL (56/69%) than their black students (80% of which are non low income - this is a silly assumption that all 7 of their low income students are AA).


Looking at schools with very low FARMS levels is not the same thing as *controlling* for SES. Even if they’renot FARMs I would bet you money that those AA kids are not nearly as affluent as the average white kids at Janney—maybe a couple, but not most.





Yes but they are not any less upper income than the AA population at Ross which is the point. What are you trying to contest? That’s Ross has richer black kids and that’s why they perform as well as their white peers? Or that Janney has lower middle class (not low enough to qualify for FARM) AA than Ross and that’s why they suck with the 36 black kids they do have? I know one thing, as a black mom of a black boy, if I had my choice, I would not enroll my kid at Janney. Also, I know about 20 families at Janney. 4 black, 1 interracial, and 5 white. 3 of the 4 Black are head and shoulders more wealthy with more prestigious careers. But you keep assuming all the black kids at Janney come from households making a modest $70k.
Anonymous
Yes but they are not any less upper income than the AA population at Ross which is the point. What are you trying to contest? That’s Ross has richer black kids and that’s why they perform as well as their white peers? Or that Janney has lower middle class (not low enough to qualify for FARM) AA than Ross and that’s why they suck with the 36 black kids they do have? I know one thing, as a black mom of a black boy, if I had my choice, I would not enroll my kid at Janney. Also, I know about 20 families at Janney. 4 black, 1 interracial, and 5 white. 3 of the 4 Black are head and shoulders more wealthy with more prestigious careers. But you keep assuming all the black kids at Janney come from households making a modest $70k.


PP here and I am simply wondering why Ross in particular has AA scores higher than comparable schools. Do you really think Ross is doing something so specific and impactful and different from Janney etc. that it increases scores that much in AA students compared to other schools? Rather than perhaps a more likely explanation, like SES differences or random fluctuations in scores? If so, all I can say is that you have more faith in the system than I do, from one black parent to another.




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SWS is killing it.


No, Ross is K.I.L.L.I.N.G it!!!

And I’m not a Ross parent. I just believe that credit should be given where it’s due.


The school's performance on ELA is especially remarkable to me given how many English language learners there are at the school. A very significant percentage of the student population seems to come from World Bank and foreign service families. The number of foreign languages that kids speak with the parents at pick up time is striking, as is the number of kids who have started at the school speaking no English at all. I think because Ross is so small, there is a sense among the principal and teaching staff that the success of every single child matters. I see at lot of individualized intervention there, and not just for kids that need to be brought up to grade level.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: