2017-2018 PARCC results

[Anonymous]

Across all grades, there is a B/W achievement gap of 60% in DCPS and 50% in charters.

Awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive white/black student achievement gap at Deal

White 90/83 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you forgot to include Asian:
White 90/83 4+
Asian 83/78 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you also did not mention the obviously large gender gap at Deal:
Female 83/65 4+
Male 69/63 4+

So you think the gender gap at Deal is larger than the white/black gap? There is no (2 points) gender gap with mat and only 11 points on ELA. Nowhere near the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive white/black student achievement gap at Deal

White 90/83 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you forgot to include Asian:
White 90/83 4+
Asian 83/78 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you also did not mention the obviously large gender gap at Deal:
Female 83/65 4+
Male 69/63 4+

So you think the gender gap at Deal is larger than the white/black gap? There is no (2 points) gender gap with mat and only 11 points on ELA. Nowhere near the same.

Wow, I never said - nor implied - that the gender gap was larger. In fact, I reported the actual data. And your math is not very good. The ELA differential is 14 points (83 minus 69 equals 14). The female ELA score is over 20% higher (14 divided by 69 equals 20.3%). Maybe that does not matter to you but it matters to others, including me. Are you only able to deal (pun intended!) with one gap at time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

Achievement gap is huge at ITS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

Achievement gap is huge at ITS.

See also math achievement gap at Ludlow. 60%

[Anonymous]

So where is the achievement gap below 40 or 50%?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

It’s obviously not rocket science. Otherwise Lee, CMI, and MV would have higher results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive white/black student achievement gap at Deal

White 90/83 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you forgot to include Asian:
White 90/83 4+
Asian 83/78 4+
Black 57/38 4+
Latino 61/42 4+

For some reason you also did not mention the obviously large gender gap at Deal:
Female 83/65 4+
Male 69/63 4+

So you think the gender gap at Deal is larger than the white/black gap? There is no (2 points) gender gap with mat and only 11 points on ELA. Nowhere near the same.

Wow, I never said - nor implied - that the gender gap was larger. In fact, I reported the actual data. And your math is not very good. The ELA differential is 14 points (83 minus 69 equals 14). The female ELA score is over 20% higher (14 divided by 69 equals 20.3%). Maybe that does not matter to you but it matters to others, including me. Are you only able to deal (pun intended!) with one gap at time?

I mistyped 11 when I meant to type 14.

Again, still don’t think a 14 point gap in one subject is worth mentioning in the same breath as the obviously huge black/white gap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

Who in the world would be excited about ITS’ 58/47 PARCC scores? Only someone with low expectations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So where is the achievement gap below 40 or 50%?

At Oyster-Adams, the black/white achievement gap in ELA is 12%; however it’s 32% in math.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

That's why I find all the "wow ITS" stuff a bit disingenuous ... they have so few at risk kids they often can't even report on them.

Achievement gap is huge at ITS.

Gap is no different or better than LAMB, MV, Brent, Deal etc

[Anonymous]

Some of this is so depressing. Ballou: 3% ELA, 0% Math. ZERO. Coolidge: 5%/0% as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So where is the achievement gap below 40 or 50%?

At Oyster-Adams, the black/white achievement gap in ELA is 12%; however it’s 32% in math.

There is essentially no black/white achievement gap at Ross: 4% in ELA and 0% in Math. DCPS needs to bottle and replicate whatever is going on at Ross!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Ludlow seems to have really consolidated its gains! 72 ELA is legit, and 51 Math is a big improvement. Seems like it’s just getting better and better...

Look folks this isn't rocket science the richer/whiter the school the higher the scores..... next

With KIPP and DC Prep being notable exceptions to that rule.

Also Banneker.

Also LAMB.

Banneker should be insulted that LAMB is trying to include itself in the same category—the scores at those two schools are NOT close.

LAMB is doing an excellent job educating a very diverse population. Why shit on that?