I don't think these "color me" threads advance anything. |
If it's a high ses area probably nothing, Obama's kids probably fit in without issue. |
I disagree. I think they might encourage folks to actually try out their neighborhood school. |
Well, that's probably not a good example. They are Obama's kids. They aren't just any other kids. Just like Chelsea probably didn't completely fit in when she went there. Being the President's kid and on the news and all. |
You don't need to remind me what color I am. I have to live in this skin. |
You are obviously not a person of color. Yes, higher SES AAs will have likely have less trouble adjusting than those from lower SES backgrounds, but there can still be issues. See this and many other threads in the private school forum: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/568946.page#9189060 |
Um, I'm AA, and send my child to a predominantly AA DCPS school. Many of my neighbors are not AA, and may feel nervous about their kid being in the minority. This thread was started in good faith, IMO, to address some of these concerns. |
Thanks for saying that, OP. The posters who argue that you'll change your mind somewhere down the road are so annoying. Yes, if things change down the road, one might make different decisions about schools. But why anticipate something that hasn't happened yet? Does it make sense to make choices out of fear or to make a choice based on factual information available at the time? |
Are you for real? You honestly do not think that your child can tell the difference between her and the other kids? Kids see skin color even when they are toddlers. You are deluding yourself that you are somehow being super liberal, or open minded, or awesome, or whatever. The other kids who are there - their parents may not have any choice where they send their kid to school - income and ability to move may hamper their school choices but it doesn't mean that they would not take the chance to move to a better performing school, a school with less FARMs rates, a school that was actually diverse. The other parents are likely to look at you and not think you are some beacon of open minded liberalness but are just dumb for making such a bad choice for your child when you have the privilege and ability to make a good school choice. |
OP here. I know she can tell the difference between herself and other kids. I'm just not sure that race is one of the important differentiators to her at this point. I don't think she walked into first grade and thought, "Wow, I'm the only white kid in here." I suspect she walked in and thought, "Hey, it's X, Y, Z friends from last year." School choice in this city - or the illusion of school choice - causes people to make big changes in anticipation of problems that may never actually occur. I do not believe in doing that - for myself or for my daughter. I have a job that I like, where I am paid well and the work is interesting with interesting colleagues, but I could make more money at other organizations or in other roles. I choose to stay here, where everything is fine, despite these other, potentially better opportunities. Things are great here now, but maybe my awesome boss will retire and I'll get a terrible new boss. Maybe this year's holiday bonus will be tiny in comparison with last year's. Maybe my company will close down in 10 years. Are any of those good reasons for me to look for new jobs, given that none of them have occurred, but they MIGHT? We didn't have a chance to send her to a different school. This is the school we got into, in the neighborhood where we live. Yes, we could move, but it would upend our family life to do so and I don't feel that's necessary since as I have mentioned several times throughout this thread, SHE IS DOING FINE WHERE SHE IS. I don't understand why this is hard for you to believe or accept. She's learning, she's happy, she's got friends, I have friends there too, and I think it's stupid to leave a situation that is working well for everyone in anticipation of it working less well. |
I agree. Whites, in general, are criticized for not thinking or talking about race. For various reasons, white families have opted out of sending their kids to schools that a high percentages of POC. OP is not one of those people. She wants to have an open discussion about it. Yes, this discussion has racially insensitive elements. Thats okay. Honestly, trolls excluded, I think the only way to have a healthy conversation is to get all of stuff out. FWIW, I'm AA. |
OP- what do you think of the notion that you may be playing roulette with your child's future by sending her to a school that may be perceived as substandard, when you have the means to do better? I personally do not believe this, but I hear this argument quite often on DCUM and IRL when it comes to going with local schools with high FARMs or minority rates. |
I think she answered this question in the above post, and also elsewhere throughout this thread. tl/dr: They like their neighborhood, they landed at their neighborhood school, the kid is doing fine at present, and if at some point this is not the case, they'll leave/move if necessary. |
OP here. I already addressed this above, but I will point out that "having the means" is really in the eye of the beholder. We rent, so yes, we could move. However, moving is disruptive and expensive. Most of the "good" schools in DC don't have a ton of rentals in general, and we're not in a position to (or interested in) buying a house right now. Even if we were, the neighborhoods those "good schools" are in are prohibitively expensive for us. Transportation costs would increase greatly, as would aftercare costs (since the "good schools" don't have nearly free aftercare like we do). Just because we COULD move doesn't mean that it would be a good thing for our family. Neither my husband nor I want to move to the suburbs, and we like where we live. As for "playing roulette" I think that it's important that the specifics of the school my child attends are one factor in her education experience, but not the only one. Parental education level, as well as socioeconomic status, are all strong predictors for student success throughout life. My husband and I went to college, and I have an advanced degree, so likely, DD will be successful in school and attend college herself. Living in poverty, particularly during early elementary school, is correlated with poor achievement throughout a child's schooling, and the effects of housing instability and food insecurity have documented effects on children's ability to learn. My child will be fine - I have yet to see a study that indicates that an UMC child attending school with lower SES children will suffer adverse effects simply by attending school with them. I understand the concern that teachers will need to spend more time helping children with lower levels of achievement and that opportunities for advanced-level work may be limited accordingly, but again, I'm not going to preemptively pull her from this school and send her to a school with more wealthy children on the possibility that she will have problems later. |
I agree with you, but only to a point. It's your privilege you're counting on to get you through, not the quality of the school, per se. I don't doubt you for a second that your daughter is doing well (and receiving many benefits) from the school. But I still get a little uncomfortable with the idea of completely erasing the fact that poor kids often get bad public institutions, because we don't take care of poor people in this country. |