Right. But I'm talking about the historical origins, which were in part a reaction to the growing priestly class in early Christianity (as well as disagreement with some of the early Christians' theological stances). |
How hard is it to understand a fairy tale? |
| Oppression |
Yes, Indian Islam used to be very, very liberal. You can still see traces of old Indian Islam in Bollywood - I'd say more than half of Bollywood is Muslim and they live and foster the racy, sassy, sensual, confident, liberal Islam that used to exist in India. True story: Back in the '60s in India, my mom's Muslim friend tried to apply for a job as a math teacher at a Catholic girls' school. The headmistress of the school, who was also an Indian Catholic nun (all the teachers were Indian Catholic nuns belonging to the same order) told her that she wouldn't hire a Muslim to teach the girls because Muslim women had a reputation for wearing short skirts, lipstick and running around with boys. That's what Islam used to be like in India. |
^^ What a distorted, effed up quote that woman has in her sign. I do not believe hijab is inherently a relic of patriarchy, or about religion (for many it definitely is just cultural), but the above message absolutely conveys that a covered women is like covered candy - an object, with value measured in her appearance. And also hypocritical - she's wearing makeup to spruce herself up. It boggles my mind when someone says they wear hijab for religious reasons, yet wear skinny jeans, or heals, or makeup, or drawing attention to their face or body with clothes & accessories yet still proclaim to be a hijabi for "modesty" reasons. Wear hijab - that's fine. It's like an accessory and it means nothing in terms of morals or religiosity. If you like it, wear it. But comparing yourself to a wrapped piece of candy just highlights the effed-up-ness of why some people wear hijab. [fwiw I come from a Muslim background, so this is certainly something I've seen and discussed a lot with others] |
The right term for his is a half-jabi. |
10pm here is probably like the dead of winter in saudi arabia. maybe she feels naked without being covered after doing it so long. who knows. |
|
The Bible says in 1 Timothy 2:9 that women should dress modestly.
1 Corithians 11:6 says women should cover their hair, at least during prayer. http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/11-6.htm |
These types crack me up. Some people like the hijab as a fashion accessory, which is fine. But don't do this and pretend you're wearing it for religious/modesty reasons. These can be cute & fashionable - but stop pretending that you're wearing it for Islam.
|
|
I was recently at a restaurant out of town and a girl walked in wearing the hijab, fully covering her head, ears, etc. Had on a skin tight black long sleeve shirt and shiny black leggings with a bodycon red dress on top. Full on makeup with matching red lips and red high heels.
It was so odd. I normally don't do double takes or stare at hijabi women and I've seen plenty with the heavy makeup and tight leggings, but this was just ridiculous. I understand a woman's desire to look appealing so I get why many hijab wearing women wear expensive handbags, keep their nails painted etc, drive high end cars, basically really label oriented- it's at least some way for them to express themselves fashionably. But it's definitely beyond that and I'm seeing it more and more. It's obvious the reason for the hijab has gone beyond supposed Quranic sanctioned modesty. It's a political statement and the newest 'rebel club' to join which I'm totally fine with, what's disturbing to me is how they hide behind religion as their biggest FU. mod•es•ty (m?d??-st?)? n. The state or quality of being modest. n. Reserve or propriety in speech, dress, or behavior. n. Lack of pretentiousness; simplicity. So much of this hijab movement by women today in no way conforms to the definition of modesty. The gig is up. Own it. |
1000X this. In a weird way, this kind of hijab is a lot more like body piercings or even tattoo's (at least back in the day). It's a form of taking charge of your own identity as a rebellious socio-political statement. It has nothing to do with Islam. What's grating is that many women hide behind the facade of religion, though it obviously has nothing to do with modesty. I'd say the same is true for niqab (worn in the US), although that's a harsher take. There is absolutely nothing modest about covering your face in a solid black head-to-toe garb. |
|
Non-muslim, non-PC response: I have mixed feelings. I don't like it because I don't think the spread of Islam into western societies. I have no problems with individual muslims, but I do have a problem with Islam as an ideology laid down by Mohammed, who I think was a really despicable human being who murdered his religious opponents and encouraged is followers to do the same. But I also personally like the actual headscarf it because I think western people generally dress like slobs nowadays, and the women often wear clothes that are too revealing. So I appreciate the purposeful modesty, as long as it is not over the top and extreme. I wish there was a way muslim people could retain the good parts of their culture and ditch the bad. But ditching the bad would involve a massive reinterpretation of the Koran. It would be much better to simply shelve the whole thing and start fresh. |
These are both letters of Paul, not Jesus' sayings as recorded by witnesses. Jesus let that woman with unbound hair annoint his feet. |
|
If a woman wants to wear a headscarf--that's fine. I do have problems with that mask thing--I've only seen it once here in the US. The woman's face was covered with net.
|
|
Burning Burqas
This is what relief looks like. No one in their right mind would wear these things voluntarily. Severe social pressure and oppression forces women to do this. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-incredible-photos-show-civilians-celebrating-freedom-in-syria-by-cutting-beards-and-burning-a7188991.html and http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/13/middleeast/syria-isis-manbij/ |