Sure, fine. All these things are reasons why it is understandable that the boy's device was reported, even investigated if school administrators didn't feel themselves capable of determining what the wire/circuit thingy was. However as the high school HAD an engineering class, I shouldn't think that something with wires and circuits was not allowed in school. And please keep in mind that MANY objects in school have wires and circuits. Still, seeing wires and a circuit board, attached to an LED display (the thingy that shows the numbers on a digital clock) might make some fear for their lives. OK I get it. Call the police, sure. BUt once it has been established that this is not a bomb, do not arrest the boy and do not suspend him. Also sounds like it might be time to get some more STEM (the E stands for Engineering) lessons into Texas high schools, and require knowledge basic circuits and batteries (5th grade science curriculum stuff) in Texan schools. |
![]() |
If it was such an explodey risk why didn't they evacuate the school, bring in a bomb squad, etc.? They did nothing else, other than harass the suspected bomber, that resembles how they'd react if they really thought it was a bomb. What compounds it is the school, police, etc., refusing to apologize. Hell I got an apology when I was driving on I-66 with hybrid plates (they let you drive in HOV lanes/roads in VA) and a cop mistakenly pulled me over. |
![]() How on earth is this a LIBERAL issue? ![]() The reaction didn't come out of a liberal stance. That's a conservative, tough on terror, tough on crime , we hate science, conservative stance. It happened in Texas. There's a bit of racism involved, since the kid is named Ahmad Mohammed. They labeled him a terrorist and the school district is standing tough on potential crime. There's also a bit of anti-intellectual/anti-science thing going on, since the school district and teacher are clearly not familiar with how much pre-engineering majors tinker with stuff. (My brothers were always messing with something.) |
Sorry but the kid was not suspended. He was arrested. Clearly there was no bomb. He opens the thing and you see a transformer, a circuit board, the LED display and driver board. That's it. There is a complete lack of anything that could even be suspected of containing an explosive. Surely the engineering teacher can see what I can see from one picture. Surely the cops know or they would have accused him of more than a "bomb hoax". |
This. I understand why the teacher would send him to the office with the clock/bomb/wired up thing. I dont understand why he was arrested. I am glad the police are not pressing charges. I do NOT understand why the school is suspending him. (I also don't understand why a pop tart gun is worth more than a detention for disruptive, annoying behavior.) |
Yep, it's the fact that they didn't evacuate, call in explosives experts (who'd have laughed and had a long lunch over it), or do anything to mitigate the perceived risk ... that moves it from "tragic but honest mistake" to "harassment." |
Let me try and get this right. Let's assume that the teacher genuinely thought that the black case with wires and computery-looking stuff was a cause for concern and possibly even a bomb. So, what does the teacher do? She doesn't pull the fire alarm or evacuate the classroom or anything else to safeguard the students or school. Instead she sends the student to the office to let someone else deal with the situation. And had it truly been a bomb, or the student had some malicious act planned, he would have had the opportunity to put the plan in motion. Nothing about this whole episode makes any sense. |
I agree. They clearly didn't think the clock was an actual bomb or threat. By all means ask the kid about it, but to arrest him is asinine. |
The school sent home a letter to all the parents. In it they remind parents that it is a violation of school rules to bring a suspicious item to school.
As to how he violated the Student Code of Conduct, on page 6 it lists the prohibited items in school. http://www.irvingisd.net/cms/lib010/TX01917973/Centricity/Domain/1454/Irving%20ISD%20Student%20Code%20of%20Conduct%202015-2106%20English.pdf
My guess is they will say that his device looked like a bomb, so it was a look-alike weapon. They will say that any reasonable person (in Texas, I guess) would think it was a bomb. Because it Texas they don't have Science and Engineering education, so people down there don't know the difference between a bomb and a bunch of circuits. |
No, she thought it might be a "look-alike" weapon, which is prohibited according to school rules. |
I agree that the average officer is not an explosives expert. That is why there are things called bomb squads. I'm pretty confident that the DFW area has them. Irving after all used to be the site of a NFL stadium. That is also why you would evacuate the school, establish a secure perimeter and implement your mass casualty protocol by mobilizing Fire and EMS personnel and putting local trauma centers on alert. The actions of the school and local PD don't pass the straight face test. |
A "look alike" weapon? Well damn, there's one on every wall, in every classroom in America. |
|
We better get all those pointy things out of schools in Irving. Scissors, pencils, biology and chemistry lab equipment, glassware, cafeteria utensils, ammonia and bleach, javelins. |