First of all, I'm not sure what this so called strategizing you're seeking to do with a bunch of hyper-partisan dimwits and RNC and DNC scum trolls on an anonymous political forum. Second of all, Dems do not need to reinvent the wheel to get back on track. They can simply nominate a normal Obama/Clinton type and the world will breath a sigh of relief. Nominate another Biden and we're screwed again. |
|
Ro Khanna – Economic justice + tech accountability; Sanders-style critique with policy fluency.
Cory Booker – Obama-style moral optimism with Clinton-era coalition instincts. Josh Shapiro – Classic Clintonian pragmatism: swing-state appeal, bipartisan tone, electoral discipline. Gavin Newsom – Clinton-like charisma and political agility; strong media fluency. Rahm Emanuel – Hard-edged Clintonian operator: transactional, strategic, results-focused. Wes Moore – Obama-adjacent narrative leadership: aspirational, disciplined, unity-focused. Michael Bennet – Technocratic, low-drama, Obama-era governing ethos. Terry McAuliffe – Pure Clinton DNA: coalition politics, donor fluency, electoral pragmatism. Pete Buttigieg – The strongest Obama analogue: cerebral, calm, rhetorically precise, norms-oriented. VP Picks Elizabeth Warren – Policy-heavy progressive populism; structural critique of capitalism with academic rigor. Sherrod Brown – Labor-first, anti-corporate economic populism with Midwest credibility. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – Generational Sanders figure: moral clarity, populist framing, movement energy. Amy Klobuchar – Clinton-style competence, incrementalism, and Midwestern credibility. Alright savvy people of DCUM, how did ChatGPT do on this one? I'm not sure it got it wrong.
|
We could have a very fair and wide-open primary and watch the cream rise to the top. Remember when we did that in 2008? That gets my vote. |
One that doesn't rely on innate characteristics to get elected. Of the ones you mentioned, I like Butigieg and Shapiro but if Butigieg implies that we should vote for him because he is gay or if Shapiro implies that we should vote for him because he is jewish, then they should lose, even if they are running against JD Vance and Stephen Miller, I'm sick of this identitarian bullshit. |
|
Wow! I hate to admit it, but, the ChatGPT post is the best one in the entire thread. Those are very sophisticated, tight summaries of each potential candidate mentioned. And I agree with the poster who did it--these summaries are pretty accurate! And insightful.
Out of curiousity, I would love to see the ChatGPT summaries when the same questions are fed in about the potential Republican candidates. PP, if you are willing to do that and post that, we would be in your debt! |
| I'm kind of an GenAI skeptic, but this rundown from ChatGPT kind of blows my mind. |
Yes Chat GPT would put cliff notes out of business unless Cliff notes were also allowed to plagiarize others. |
chat gpt pp poster here. Just ran the following prompt for the GOP, but since the party is so compromised by Trump, I asked it who would govern like Reagan....thoughts?
"Below are ten living Republicans who could plausibly govern like Ronald Reagan today—not in nostalgia or slogans, but in actual executive behavior: optimism, delegation, institutional respect, coalition-building, pro-alliance foreign policy, and governing without grievance. These are people who have demonstrated Reagan-style governance traits, not just talked about them. Most plausible Reagan-style governors in practice Larry Hogan Best modern analogue. Executed Reagan’s core governing method: reassure the public, avoid demonization, govern pragmatically, keep rhetoric optimistic while focusing on outcomes. Charlie Baker Reagan’s managerial model updated: high trust, low drama, coalition governance, strong delegation, public reassurance during crises. Phil Scott Reagan without theatrics: calm authority, refusal of culture-war politics, steady executive tone that lowers social temperature. John Kasich Reagan-like moral optimism and pluralistic language; governed from conviction without cruelty or grievance. Reagan-style seriousness + institutional loyalty Mitt Romney Lacks Reagan’s folksiness, but shares his restraint, internationalism, and willingness to absorb political cost to protect institutions. Jon Huntsman Jr. Reagan-Bush diplomatic realism: pro-alliance, globally fluent, calm executive temperament. Mitch Daniels Reagan’s discipline without showmanship: focused on fiscal stewardship, governance over performance. Reagan’s norms-first governing instinct Condoleezza Rice Reagan worldview embodied: institutional respect, American leadership without belligerence, competence-first governance. Lisa Murkowski Reagan-style independence: willing to defy party to protect democratic norms; governance over populism. Susan Collins Old-school Republican institutionalism: cautious, stabilizing, norm-protective—traits Reagan relied on internally. Why these people could govern like Reagan They share Reagan’s governing method, not just ideology: Lower emotional temperature Delegation to experts Optimism without denial of complexity Institutional loyalty Coalition-first thinking Comfort losing elections rather than breaking norms DCUM posters, how did it do? |
Any human with a live pulse not named Trump or Biden will be a major upgrade from the stinky rubbish that has occupied The White House since 2017. |
I’m actually getting a little bit excited seeing that list. |
Me too. The stars of the 2028 primary will announce themselves to the public in 2027. It will be very refreshing to see POTUS worthy people seeking the Dem nomination on a level playing field again. |
Despite what the pundits on this forum claim, we also had open primaries in 2016 and 2020 as well. You’re just pissed that most voters preferred Hillary and Joe. |
| Plot twist: it’s Barron Trump! |
Tell us you know nothing about modern tell politics in America without telling us. It's fruitcakes like you that are to blame for two Trump terms. Find a brain. |
|
Chat GPT poster here again. I mean, I am energized by the names too .. but it is a sorry state of affairs when AI is able to generate these answers.
Additionally, we might be better off if Cheeto would just govern through chat gpt for the next three years As things stand, he cannot even be bothered to whip out his phone and type a prompt like this into chat gpt ..
"Write me a 20 minute speech about how I alone will fix the economy at warp speed in 2026. Make me sound more brilliant than FDR and Obama combined but as crass and offensive as Donald J. Trump at his worst." Work smarter not harder, sheesh. |