Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

I shopped at AE decades ago. My teens don’t like the store. SS’s ad and people defending it aren’t going to make it more appealing. Do you jokers realize we have kids who in the demographic?

Exactly, how do the actual teenagers feel about the store. It doesn’t matter if a bunch of Gen X people come online and cheer “Hot girls in ads again, woo!” They aren’t buying the jeans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

I shopped at AE decades ago. My teens don’t like the store. SS’s ad and people defending it aren’t going to make it more appealing. Do you jokers realize we have kids who in the demographic?

Exactly, how do the actual teenagers feel about the store. It doesn’t matter if a bunch of Gen X people come online and cheer “Hot girls in ads again, woo!” They aren’t buying the jeans.

Teen boys know exactly who SS is.

[Anonymous]

I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

I shopped at AE decades ago. My teens don’t like the store. SS’s ad and people defending it aren’t going to make it more appealing. Do you jokers realize we have kids who in the demographic?

Do you think you’re the only parent of teens around here? If their previous ads with models who probably look more like you and yours were successful, then they would have stuck with that.

They are at a low and going further downhill. Full stop. This ad confirms how out of touch they are with their audience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

Who is their audience? They can’t be all things to all people. If you don’t like them don’t shop there but don’t pretend you have been a long term customer up until now. You aren’t their market either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

It was meant to be provocative and it was. When was the last time anyone talked about AE?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

Who is their audience? They can’t be all things to all people. If you don’t like them don’t shop there but don’t pretend you have been a long term customer up until now. You aren’t their market either.

Their market is teenager and young adult women. They do sell men’s clothes but that is probably the smallest part of their brand. The also have sister stores Aerie which is underwear and loungewear and Offline which is fitness wear, both of those are women only.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

It was meant to be provocative and it was. When was the last time anyone talked about AE?

This.

Seriously, this convo is crazy. I wonder if there is a type of social media mental illness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

Who is their audience? They can’t be all things to all people. If you don’t like them don’t shop there but don’t pretend you have been a long term customer up until now. You aren’t their market either.

Their market is teenager and young adult women. They do sell men’s clothes but that is probably the smallest part of their brand. The also have sister stores Aerie which is underwear and loungewear and Offline which is fitness wear, both of those are women only.

So, probably no one posting here.

My teen DS has gotten jeans from there. Definitely not worth the $$. He doesn’t care about the store’s ads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a teen boy who knows who she is but I doubt it's going to make him want to start shopping there.

But I bet he’s seen the ad already.

DP. Is he buying clothes? If not, it’s a big miss.

Who is their audience? They can’t be all things to all people. If you don’t like them don’t shop there but don’t pretend you have been a long term customer up until now. You aren’t their market either.

Their market is teenager and young adult women. They do sell men’s clothes but that is probably the smallest part of their brand. The also have sister stores Aerie which is underwear and loungewear and Offline which is fitness wear, both of those are women only.

It’s a saturated market yet here we are talking about AE. By that measure it was very successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

ngl, she looks like she has a mild case of Downs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

DP but there's a pretty huge gulf between not blindly cheering for an ad that goes out of its way to say Aryan genes are "good genes" and wanting to erase the blondes of the world. But I agree that the PPP should not have said "she's as nazi as they come" if what they meant (I hope) was that she embodies the physical ideal held up by Nazis - there's a difference between having Aryan features and being a member of the Aryan Brotherhood.

Good genes=she's pretty. Jesus, do you people even hear yourselves?

[Anonymous]

And before you say "what do you mean by "you people", I mean people who choose to be offended by just about anything.