Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would be a great rep for a brand like, say Reformation, but this feels off-brand for AE. They needed an It Girl who is more "girl hot" and less "guy hot" like Zendaya or something.

Please educate this old lady on why it would have been better for Reformation.

Reformation is a sexy brand, AE is not, and continues to not be, despite the SS ad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would be a great rep for a brand like, say Reformation, but this feels off-brand for AE. They needed an It Girl who is more "girl hot" and less "guy hot" like Zendaya or something.

Totally disagree.

Guy hot and girl hot are the same thing. Beauty sells and it is nice to see a brand get back to beauty after the past few year of meh and downright ugly.

I disagree with this. There is overlap between the two, however I think women tend to gravitate towards striking facial features and men gravitate towards body. Some women have both which makes them both Guy hot and Girl hot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would be a great rep for a brand like, say Reformation, but this feels off-brand for AE. They needed an It Girl who is more "girl hot" and less "guy hot" like Zendaya or something.

Totally disagree.

Guy hot and girl hot are the same thing. Beauty sells and it is nice to see a brand get back to beauty after the past few year of meh and downright ugly.

I disagree with this. There is overlap between the two, however I think women tend to gravitate towards striking facial features and men gravitate towards body. Some women have both which makes them both Guy hot and Girl hot.

Conservatives spent so much time trying to tell us that men and women but now they are trying to say we’re the same on something so fundamental like sexual attractiveness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe people are getting worked up over an ad. It is just an advertising campaign and it’s not saying anything wrong. People just want to get offended and hysterical over a non-issue.

I really don’t want to make this put political but if you want to know part of the reason why Democrats lost and why favorability is at historic lows is precisely because of BS like this.

Yes! Just stop the hysterics already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

I shopped at AE decades ago. My teens don’t like the store. SS’s ad and people defending it aren’t going to make it more appealing. Do you jokers realize we have kids who in the demographic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

So she should be ashamed. Lol. Not going to happen. Sorry the pretty white girl has triggered you. But that’s a you problem.

I didn’t say SS should be ashamed. Nor am I triggered. As I said, you folks need to exaggerate because you cannot deal with facts as they exist.

Wasting time on the so called facts is certainly a choice. You probably never shopped at AE before so this really has nothing to do with you. People are looking at AE and talking about it. That’s the only point.

I shopped at AE decades ago. My teens don’t like the store. SS’s ad and people defending it aren’t going to make it more appealing. Do you jokers realize we have kids who in the demographic?

Do you think you’re the only parent of teens around here? If their previous ads with models who probably look more like you and yours were successful, then they would have stuck with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

It’s the specific genes the ad is highlighting that are the problem. It’s selling Aryaness, not having a specific figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

DP but there's a pretty huge gulf between not blindly cheering for an ad that goes out of its way to say Aryan genes are "good genes" and wanting to erase the blondes of the world. But I agree that the PPP should not have said "she's as nazi as they come" if what they meant (I hope) was that she embodies the physical ideal held up by Nazis - there's a difference between having Aryan features and being a member of the Aryan Brotherhood.

Where does the ad say that Aryan genes are good genes? SS isn’t even a blonde anyway.

Way to overthink.

Did you not watch the ad? Do you think people are just reacting to a blonde lady getting a job?

(DP). Yeah, pretty much. I think the ad is “triggering” people because it reminds them that blonde, white, blue eyed people used to be considered “superior” by some (racist) people.

When taken that way, the ad is in poor taste. But the response of those triggered is also way out of line. It’s an ad. It features someone white talking about her “genes”/jeans. It’s not that deep. White people exist, some are really hot, if that triggers you, seek help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

It’s the specific genes the ad is highlighting that are the problem. It’s selling Aryaness, not having a specific figure.

Explain what you mean by Aryaness specifically. Because she’s not even really blond. And she’s pretty short. Not ticking a lot of boxes other than white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

It’s the specific genes the ad is highlighting that are the problem. It’s selling Aryaness, not having a specific figure.

How is it “selling Aryaness”? What does that even mean?

And if your response is going to be something like “I don’t have the energy to explain it, you should know what I mean, wahhh!” - don’t bother responding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

These comments are disgusting. It's almost as if you want to erase anyone who has whatever you deem to be Nazi features. How stupid....80% of the models throughout the 20 and 21st century don't have the right to have made money on their looks....because their looks are triggering, according to what you've implied? If you're going to talk about inclusiveness, you need to understand that goes for ALL races.

Won’t anyone think of the poor maligned blue-eyed, blond-haired models?!??!??

It’s hilarious. As if SS needs to apologize to the brunettes and brown eyes of the world for merely existing. The fake meltdown was predictable from the usual people who thrive on controversy for clicks.

I don’t recall seeing anyone who has said that Sweeney needs to apologize for existing. But you have to exaggerate to make it look like a fake controversy. I imagine people who do that can’t deal with the real controversy as it exists.

Is she allowed to be grateful for her good genes or not?

She’s “allowed“ to do anything. And I’m allowed to think she has poor taste for highlighting the genes she did and in the way she did.

It’s the specific genes the ad is highlighting that are the problem. It’s selling Aryaness, not having a specific figure.

lol you really have to noodle twist logic to think they’re promoting Aryaness. It’s a pretty girl with nice jeans. That’s it.

That’s their job, to put pretty people to sell merchandise.