Kamala Harris Says Anyone Who Breaks Into Her House Is ‘Getting Shot’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a huge Kamala fan and I didn’t care for that statement by her. It speaks to a larger issue of gun safety. While she may not have children at home, access to loaded guns is very dangerous and causes many accidental deaths and suicides a year.

However I’m still voting for her.

More liberal YouTube influencers have started discussing violent crime in their cities. They bought guns to keep in their house.

Twice I know of kids who found guns. I found a gun twice as a kid. I wasn't supposed to, but I went in my parents room and rummaged through their stuff all the time. I babysat neighbors and the little kids showed me where the gun was. And they new where to find the bullets.

That's always frightened me with kids in the house.

[Anonymous]

In other news:

“Instacart Suspends Delivery to Kamala Harris House”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous and irresponsible statement to make from someone prioritizing safer gun legislation. You can't just shoot anyone who enters your home - conditions need to be met first.

More concerning is a comment about shooting someone and then saying she shouldn't have said it and her staff will clean that up. If she can't handle herself on these topics how will she interact with Xi and other world leaders? They will not find these blithe comments so cute. What a mess, Democratic Party

Pray tell us those conditions...
If someone uninvited and unknown to you breaks into your home, what exactly would you do?

“Leave now or I will shoot”

“If you come closer I will shoot”

Or, If you shoot an unarmed kid in the back and kill him as you encounter him leaving your home with your handbag, state prosecutors could come after you.

Again, the statement “Come into my home and I will shoot you” - is wildly irresponsible especially from someone familiar with the law and prosecution process. Not every offense is equal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not true that you can shoot just anyone who enters your home - it depends upon the state. Some require reasonable retreat first, or response commensurate with the offense - is the entered demonstrating attempt to use deadly force, or is it an unarmed burglary or even drunken person entering wrong house.

If we are meaning talk about gun control, our leaders should talk responsibly about the topic and not just make little quips

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/04/18/us/stand-your-ground-laws-explainer

Reasonable retreat?! Do you mean after your polite, calm request asking them to please leave? How close to you or your loved ones will you let them get?

Just call 911 and let the police handle it. Vigilanteism is not the answer Kamala!

PP here. You might want to think about what an intruder can do to you, your loved ones, and your home in the 12 to 15 minutes before the police can get there.

Violence is never the right answer.

Protection is the right answer when criminals break into your home. In our home, we have no guns, but I'm beginning to think one is needed. For now, any intruder will be met by an 80 lb dog.

Depending on the possible intruder, your dog may not survive the intrusion. Violent, aggressive, possibly drug addicted criminals may harm your dog.

PP here. I know...we live in a large city with lenient DAs. They let criminals out to repeat violent crimes because the criminals are only 18, 19, etc with immature brains and/or low IQ..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous and irresponsible statement to make from someone prioritizing safer gun legislation. You can't just shoot anyone who enters your home - conditions need to be met first.

More concerning is a comment about shooting someone and then saying she shouldn't have said it and her staff will clean that up. If she can't handle herself on these topics how will she interact with Xi and other world leaders? They will not find these blithe comments so cute. What a mess, Democratic Party

Pray tell us those conditions...
If someone uninvited and unknown to you breaks into your home, what exactly would you do?

“Leave now or I will shoot”

“If you come closer I will shoot”

Or, If you shoot an unarmed kid in the back and kill him as you encounter him leaving your home with your handbag, state prosecutors could come after you.

Again, the statement “Come into my home and I will shoot you” - is wildly irresponsible especially from someone familiar with the law and prosecution process. Not every offense is equal.

LOL! Suuure! Those statements won't mean anything to those criminals, despite your efforts to portray them as kind, polite teens. If they are entering our home and approaching us, they won't be shot in the back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Well there's that one extreme of picking a fight with a random teenager who was walking outside minding his own business and then shooting him when the fight you picked with him starts going wrong... Zimmerman basically legalized random shootings of anyone you don't like with little grounds in many red state jurisdictions.

Read the court transcript to find out why he was acquitted by a jury. The media reported a bunch of lies as usual.
He didn't pick a fight, he called the cops on someone who appeared to be 'up to no good, on drugs' which in fact he was.
It was TrayVon who saw this guy following him, and instead of going home turned around and went after Zimmerman as he was retreating to his truck as the police instructed.
One witness said this was because she was on the phone with him and suggested Zimmerman was a pedophile after TrayVon and his brother.

[Anonymous]

Kamala the prosecutor would prosecute Kamala the shooter and take it easy on criminals.
Cops turned their back on her because she took it easy on the killer of cop Isaac Espinoza.

[Anonymous]

It was a stupid comment to win votes and no wonder Oprah was surprised. Kamala Harris probably lost a lot of the black vote with that comment.

Just ridiculous - and from a prosecutor!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not true that you can shoot just anyone who enters your home - it depends upon the state. Some require reasonable retreat first, or response commensurate with the offense - is the entered demonstrating attempt to use deadly force, or is it an unarmed burglary or even drunken person entering wrong house.

If we are meaning talk about gun control, our leaders should talk responsibly about the topic and not just make little quips

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/04/18/us/stand-your-ground-laws-explainer

Reasonable retreat?! Do you mean after your polite, calm request asking them to please leave? How close to you or your loved ones will you let them get?

Just call 911 and let the police handle it. Vigilanteism is not the answer Kamala!

PP here. You might want to think about what an intruder can do to you, your loved ones, and your home in the 12 to 15 minutes before the police can get there.

Violence is never the right answer.

Protection is the right answer when criminals break into your home. In our home, we have no guns, but I'm beginning to think one is needed. For now, any intruder will be met by an 80 lb dog.

You obviously have a really small penis, and are desperate to make up for it.

No, I'm a female living in a large city.

Does not matter.

If you own a gun, you are a man with a small penis.

[Anonymous]

Kamala just advocated the death penalty for property crime.

[Anonymous]

Awww, the Republicans are very angry and upset about this! Tender, tender little men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Awww, the Republicans are very angry and upset about this! Tender, tender little men.

It’s because they are all ammosexuals.

[Anonymous]

England and Japan are laughing so hard at us right now. This is beyond embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala just advocated the death penalty for property crime.

Exactly.

She just destroyed her campaign. What's next? Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a stupid comment to win votes and no wonder Oprah was surprised. Kamala Harris probably lost a lot of the black vote with that comment.

Just ridiculous - and from a prosecutor!

Why do you say the Black vote?