Usha Vance Dresses

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:White women age terribly, so they are being hostile to Usha. There is nothing wrong with what she wore, how she dresses etc. Plus, Usha Vance will get the Indian votes and donations.

SLOTUS is a bigger deal than VPOTUS (i.e. Kamala)? Okay...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought she looked fine and I’m not a trump supporter. I don’t think she cared enough to plan ahead. Also has 3 young kids. Pretty sure going forward she’ll access what she needs to play the part. Hopefully a stylist and shopper who can spend the time.

I’m thin, similar age lawyer with 3 kids and have gotten by with a minimalist look most of my life. That’s slowly changing. Sometimes I tell myself to plan ahead for events and majority of the time it doesn’t happen.

But … is your husband a VP candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:White people and their exoticism of a regular American woman just happens to be of Indian descent is kind of gross, don't you think? There is nothing spectacular about her looks, she has a very plain face. She does have a nice body, I'll give her that. But all this "she's beautiful, she's so stylish, she's so glamorous". No, she's really not. She's just not white and a lot of you equate that with exotic and stunning. So ridiculous.

Jealously is not a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:White people and their exoticism of a regular American woman just happens to be of Indian descent is kind of gross, don't you think? There is nothing spectacular about her looks, she has a very plain face. She does have a nice body, I'll give her that. But all this "she's beautiful, she's so stylish, she's so glamorous". No, she's really not. She's just not white and a lot of you equate that with exotic and stunning. So ridiculous.

Jealously is not a good look.

Who is Usha jealous of?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ugh she needs CC cream like now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT is already raving about her in comparison to the Trump women. Awful, sycophantic media.

Wait. You're saying the media is sycophantic for Trump's campaign members?

There is a poster here who has clearly lost her mind with Usha hate.

+1
Beyond pathetic. Usha looked great. No doubt she had the services of a makeup artist but she's her own person and probably told the makeup artist to go very natural. Or maybe she declined her services altogether. She has a gorgeous head of hair and while I wasn't crazy about the beige dress, it was fine. She looked really nice in the blue and the red dresses.

If we do not say she is perfectly beautiful and the smartest person in the room, that is not hate. She is not all that and a bag of chips as we used to say and that is not a big deal.

Agree. People have their panties in a twist because she "seems so nice and humble" and has a "remarkable pedigree". I could care less what colleges she went to or if she's a lawyer or not..we're talking about beauty and fashion. We should be able to agree to disagree about her hairstyle (or lack thereof), and just because I think homegirl could use blush and a better bra doesn't mean that I have issues.

DP. Are you the poster who claimed Usha “thinks she’s hotter than she really is”? If so then you absolutely have issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:White people and their exoticism of a regular American woman just happens to be of Indian descent is kind of gross, don't you think? There is nothing spectacular about her looks, she has a very plain face. She does have a nice body, I'll give her that. But all this "she's beautiful, she's so stylish, she's so glamorous". No, she's really not. She's just not white and a lot of you equate that with exotic and stunning. So ridiculous.

Post the quotes of posters saying anything of the sort. She’s had people saying she’s lovely and looked great. Do you typically exaggerate to such an extent?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:THIS IS THE FASHION AND BEAUTY THREAD. If we can't internalize our misogyny here, where the hell else can we do it?

LOL!

At least you admit it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was concerned to find out that shes only 39. It’s evident that the woman hasnt heard of moisturizer or SPF.

Concern troll is concerned! Noted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat who will vote for Vance because of his Indian-American wife, if Trump steps aside. Don't care for her dresses. She should wear her mom's saree.

WTH? Why should she wear her mom’s sari? How incredibly absurd. Not to mention, I highly doubt an academic such as her mother even wears a sari.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat who will vote for Vance because of his Indian-American wife, if Trump steps aside. Don't care for her dresses. She should wear her mom's saree.

That’s nuts. She doesn’t give a damn about Indians, why would you?? She clerked for Kavanaugh- yuk. That’s all I need to know about her, yuk

You sound articulate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was concerned to find out that shes only 39. It’s evident that the woman hasnt heard of moisturizer or SPF.

Concern troll is concerned! Noted.

Some people look older than their actual age, some people look younger. A lot has to do with what our parents looked like and how they looked at various ages. How we look is not entirely within our own control. In the long run, who cares? It’s who we are inside that counts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:White people and their exoticism of a regular American woman just happens to be of Indian descent is kind of gross, don't you think? There is nothing spectacular about her looks, she has a very plain face. She does have a nice body, I'll give her that. But all this "she's beautiful, she's so stylish, she's so glamorous". No, she's really not. She's just not white and a lot of you equate that with exotic and stunning. So ridiculous.

Jealously is not a good look.

Neither is that oatmeal travel dress with the well loved espadrilles!

[Anonymous]

She and her husband both look a lot older than their age of 39. They’ve lived a hard life in ways we probably don’t know about.

JD had glow up relative to four years ago…but he looks like he aged 10 years in four years: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9kVybrOeed/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==