Trump trusted more than Biden on democracy among key swing-state voters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.

What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.

NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas

Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”

Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.

A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.

Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.

dp; I understood what you meant. I think that many democrats (like hyperventilating pp) choose to start complaining about republicans reflexively instead of discussing the issues on substance.

There has to be reasons why Trump is more trusted by the people sampled for this poll, and if people don’t want to discuss the possibilities, they should create their own thread to talk about Trump and republicans.

PP here. You get it. This sort of poll — which I suspect would be widely replicated among swing voters and undecideds in particular — should be ringing all sorts of alarm bells for the Democrats. But those alarm bells aren’t ringing. The reflexive response is instead “but the Republicans,” which entirely misses the point. It’s unhelpful and if anything solidifies the very issue that OP is talking about.

How are the Democrats supposed to handle people who clearly have no grip on reality?

You need to stop believing Democrats are the only ones with a grip on reality. There are clearly situations where the Democrats are as ungrounded in reality as Republicans are. Acknowledge that basic fact, and then you sound a lot more trustworthy.

No, I'm sorry. There is such a thing as verifiable fact. I'm not interested in validating stupidity.

Name calling poll respondents and other posters as stupid is unnecessary and rude.

The "F Your Feelings" crowd is offended.

No, the normal people crowd think it’s unnecessary and rude.

Being nice to people who believe in equality of opinion is partially what got us here.

American citizens do have a right to their own opinions, and everyone’s opinions are important.

So are you representing yourself as a democrat and you are stating that some people’s opinions are more important than other people’s opinions? Can you tell me who has important opinions and who has unimportant opinions?

And you don’t think Americans should be “nice” to other Americans with different opinions? Is that what you’re saying?

I'll bite.

Someone who says the US is a Christian country and as such, our laws and practices must adhere to fundamentalist Christian cannon being imposed on them.

That is an opinion.

Another opinion is, the US was founded on the freedom to practice one's religion without government interference.

These are two contrasting opinions, with the GOP on the former and most rational people on the latter.

You need to come with a lot more evidence that the GOP is pushing Christian fundamentalism. I'm on the right, I listen to all the right wing stuff (Walsh, Shapiro, Tucker, etc) and I've literally never heard them discuss this. Also many of the thought leaders in the GOP are Catholic, which is by definition not fundamentalism.

then you are not paying attention

forcing schools to display the ten comandments and denying abortion on religious grounds are absolutely imposing religion.

That's not Christian fundamentalist tho. That's religion, but not fundamentalist or even Christian.

it is part of one religion that a minority of the people are imposing on others.

People practicing their religion isn’t imposing it on others. Nobody on the right wants to impose their religion on others. That’s a made up story to scare people.

oh, really?

Yeah? And blue state force their religion of gender identity in schools. As an atheist, I see no difference in the fanaticism.

+100. I haven’t heard stories about public school teachers lecturing students about Jesus. I have seen them teaching 7 year olds that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or neither.

Signed, another atheist

So you want to force kids to grow up in a box and not into their true straight, gay or whatever selves?

How do we know what their true selves are if they are impressionable and brainwashed by gender doesn’t exist activists from a young age? Let kids be kids and don’t teach any sexuality to them at all. First, it’s teaching gender and sexuality awareness , Nezt
It will be teaching sex. That’s what those groups ultimately want: trans ageism.

“I’ve always felt like I’m a 5 year old inside. I want to enroll in preK as a student.”

We lead down a dangerous road if we use feelings to dictate laws rather than common sense and hundred of years of science and biology.

Kids laugh at trans for a reason. They know it’s silly to be the wrong gender

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.

What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.

NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas

Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”

Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.

A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.

Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.

dp; I understood what you meant. I think that many democrats (like hyperventilating pp) choose to start complaining about republicans reflexively instead of discussing the issues on substance.

There has to be reasons why Trump is more trusted by the people sampled for this poll, and if people don’t want to discuss the possibilities, they should create their own thread to talk about Trump and republicans.

PP here. You get it. This sort of poll — which I suspect would be widely replicated among swing voters and undecideds in particular — should be ringing all sorts of alarm bells for the Democrats. But those alarm bells aren’t ringing. The reflexive response is instead “but the Republicans,” which entirely misses the point. It’s unhelpful and if anything solidifies the very issue that OP is talking about.

How are the Democrats supposed to handle people who clearly have no grip on reality?

You need to stop believing Democrats are the only ones with a grip on reality. There are clearly situations where the Democrats are as ungrounded in reality as Republicans are. Acknowledge that basic fact, and then you sound a lot more trustworthy.

No, I'm sorry. There is such a thing as verifiable fact. I'm not interested in validating stupidity.

Name calling poll respondents and other posters as stupid is unnecessary and rude.

The "F Your Feelings" crowd is offended.

No, the normal people crowd think it’s unnecessary and rude.

Being nice to people who believe in equality of opinion is partially what got us here.

American citizens do have a right to their own opinions, and everyone’s opinions are important.

So are you representing yourself as a democrat and you are stating that some people’s opinions are more important than other people’s opinions? Can you tell me who has important opinions and who has unimportant opinions?

And you don’t think Americans should be “nice” to other Americans with different opinions? Is that what you’re saying?

I'll bite.

Someone who says the US is a Christian country and as such, our laws and practices must adhere to fundamentalist Christian cannon being imposed on them.

That is an opinion.

Another opinion is, the US was founded on the freedom to practice one's religion without government interference.

These are two contrasting opinions, with the GOP on the former and most rational people on the latter.

You need to come with a lot more evidence that the GOP is pushing Christian fundamentalism. I'm on the right, I listen to all the right wing stuff (Walsh, Shapiro, Tucker, etc) and I've literally never heard them discuss this. Also many of the thought leaders in the GOP are Catholic, which is by definition not fundamentalism.

then you are not paying attention

forcing schools to display the ten comandments and denying abortion on religious grounds are absolutely imposing religion.

That's not Christian fundamentalist tho. That's religion, but not fundamentalist or even Christian.

it is part of one religion that a minority of the people are imposing on others.

People practicing their religion isn’t imposing it on others. Nobody on the right wants to impose their religion on others. That’s a made up story to scare people.

oh, really?

Yeah? And blue state force their religion of gender identity in schools. As an atheist, I see no difference in the fanaticism.

+100. I haven’t heard stories about public school teachers lecturing students about Jesus. I have seen them teaching 7 year olds that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or neither.

Signed, another atheist

So you want to force kids to grow up in a box and not into their true straight, gay or whatever selves?

No. Kids can grow up and become gay or straight at the developmentally appropriate ages. However they will never be able to become the opposite sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

Yes to all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

AnonymousI wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.

What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.

NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas

Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”

Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.

A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.

Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.

dp; I understood what you meant. I think that many democrats (like hyperventilating pp) choose to start complaining about republicans reflexively instead of discussing the issues on substance.

There has to be reasons why Trump is more trusted by the people sampled for this poll, and if people don’t want to discuss the possibilities, they should create their own thread to talk about Trump and republicans.

PP here. You get it. This sort of poll — which I suspect would be widely replicated among swing voters and undecideds in particular — should be ringing all sorts of alarm bells for the Democrats. But those alarm bells aren’t ringing. The reflexive response is instead “but the Republicans,” which entirely misses the point. It’s unhelpful and if anything solidifies the very issue that OP is talking about.

How are the Democrats supposed to handle people who clearly have no grip on reality?

You need to stop believing Democrats are the only ones with a grip on reality. There are clearly situations where the Democrats are as ungrounded in reality as Republicans are. Acknowledge that basic fact, and then you sound a lot more trustworthy.

No, I'm sorry. There is such a thing as verifiable fact. I'm not interested in validating stupidity.

Name calling poll respondents and other posters as stupid is unnecessary and rude.

The "F Your Feelings" crowd is offended.

No, the normal people crowd think it’s unnecessary and rude.

Being nice to people who believe in equality of opinion is partially what got us here.

American citizens do have a right to their own opinions, and everyone’s opinions are important.

So are you representing yourself as a democrat and you are stating that some people’s opinions are more important than other people’s opinions? Can you tell me who has important opinions and who has unimportant opinions?

And you don’t think Americans should be “nice” to other Americans with different opinions? Is that what you’re saying?

I'll bite.

Someone who says the US is a Christian country and as such, our laws and practices must adhere to fundamentalist Christian cannon being imposed on them.

That is an opinion.

Another opinion is, the US was founded on the freedom to practice one's religion without government interference.

These are two contrasting opinions, with the GOP on the former and most rational people on the latter.

You need to come with a lot more evidence that the GOP is pushing Christian fundamentalism. I'm on the right, I listen to all the right wing stuff (Walsh, Shapiro, Tucker, etc) and I've literally never heard them discuss this. Also many of the thought leaders in the GOP are Catholic, which is by definition not fundamentalism.

then you are not paying attention

forcing schools to display the ten comandments and denying abortion on religious grounds are absolutely imposing religion.

That's not Christian fundamentalist tho. That's religion, but not fundamentalist or even Christian.

it is part of one religion that a minority of the people are imposing on others.

People practicing their religion isn’t imposing it on others. Nobody on the right wants to impose their religion on others. That’s a made up story to scare people.

oh, really?

Yeah? And blue state force their religion of gender identity in schools. As an atheist, I see no difference in the fanaticism.

+100. I haven’t heard stories about public school teachers lecturing students about Jesus. I have seen them teaching 7 year olds that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or neither.

Signed, another atheist

So you want to force kids to grow up in a box and not into their true straight, gay or whatever selves?

The pp didn't mention sexual orientation. They only discussed teachers saying that boys can turn into girls or vice versa. On this count, yes. Children grow up in a sort of box, a container that constrains their ability to be whatever they want, and that box is called a body. And bodies have genders, which are found not just in your crotch but all the way down to the chromosomal level of your body. Can you have a doctor make you something that looks like a vagina? Yes. Doesn't mean you have a vagina that functions as a normal vagina and it doesn't change your biological sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.

What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.

NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas

Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”

Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.

A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.

Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.

dp; I understood what you meant. I think that many democrats (like hyperventilating pp) choose to start complaining about republicans reflexively instead of discussing the issues on substance.

There has to be reasons why Trump is more trusted by the people sampled for this poll, and if people don’t want to discuss the possibilities, they should create their own thread to talk about Trump and republicans.

PP here. You get it. This sort of poll — which I suspect would be widely replicated among swing voters and undecideds in particular — should be ringing all sorts of alarm bells for the Democrats. But those alarm bells aren’t ringing. The reflexive response is instead “but the Republicans,” which entirely misses the point. It’s unhelpful and if anything solidifies the very issue that OP is talking about.

How are the Democrats supposed to handle people who clearly have no grip on reality?

You need to stop believing Democrats are the only ones with a grip on reality. There are clearly situations where the Democrats are as ungrounded in reality as Republicans are. Acknowledge that basic fact, and then you sound a lot more trustworthy.

No, I'm sorry. There is such a thing as verifiable fact. I'm not interested in validating stupidity.

Name calling poll respondents and other posters as stupid is unnecessary and rude.

The "F Your Feelings" crowd is offended.

No, the normal people crowd think it’s unnecessary and rude.

Being nice to people who believe in equality of opinion is partially what got us here.

American citizens do have a right to their own opinions, and everyone’s opinions are important.

So are you representing yourself as a democrat and you are stating that some people’s opinions are more important than other people’s opinions? Can you tell me who has important opinions and who has unimportant opinions?

And you don’t think Americans should be “nice” to other Americans with different opinions? Is that what you’re saying?

I'll bite.

Someone who says the US is a Christian country and as such, our laws and practices must adhere to fundamentalist Christian cannon being imposed on them.

That is an opinion.

Another opinion is, the US was founded on the freedom to practice one's religion without government interference.

These are two contrasting opinions, with the GOP on the former and most rational people on the latter.

You need to come with a lot more evidence that the GOP is pushing Christian fundamentalism. I'm on the right, I listen to all the right wing stuff (Walsh, Shapiro, Tucker, etc) and I've literally never heard them discuss this. Also many of the thought leaders in the GOP are Catholic, which is by definition not fundamentalism.

then you are not paying attention

forcing schools to display the ten comandments and denying abortion on religious grounds are absolutely imposing religion.

That's not Christian fundamentalist tho. That's religion, but not fundamentalist or even Christian.

it is part of one religion that a minority of the people are imposing on others.

People practicing their religion isn’t imposing it on others. Nobody on the right wants to impose their religion on others. That’s a made up story to scare people.

oh, really?

Yeah? And blue state force their religion of gender identity in schools. As an atheist, I see no difference in the fanaticism.

+100. I haven’t heard stories about public school teachers lecturing students about Jesus. I have seen them teaching 7 year olds that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or neither.

Signed, another atheist

So you want to force kids to grow up in a box and not into their true straight, gay or whatever selves?

No. Kids can grow up and become gay or straight at the developmentally appropriate ages. However they will never be able to become the opposite sex.

Very true.

They also won't be able to become giraffes or medieval kings or attack helicopters.

[Anonymous]

You can’t have a democracy when you let in millions of foreign nationals, completely invested, then demand they be allowed to vote. It’s absolutely bonkers. Democrats are bat s insane.

[Anonymous]

^ *Completely unvetted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

Do you actually think Trump knows the names of his grandchildren? He cheated on 2 of his wives. Don’t think you want to go there about being a “family man”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

Do you actually think Trump knows the names of his grandchildren? He cheated on 2 of his wives. Don’t think you want to go there about being a “family man”.

Joe has never met his granddaughter in AL.
Hunter has never met his daughter in AL.
Jill has never met her granddaughter in AL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

Do you actually think Trump knows the names of his grandchildren? He cheated on 2 of his wives. Don’t think you want to go there about being a “family man”.

Trumps kids are healthy and Ivy educated. He leaves a trail of wealth and happiness

Joe leaves a scorched earth of inflation, war, drug addiction and mental failure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

Do you actually think Trump knows the names of his grandchildren? He cheated on 2 of his wives. Don’t think you want to go there about being a “family man”.

Joe has never met his granddaughter in AL.
Hunter has never met his daughter in AL.
Jill has never met her granddaughter in AL.

I guess you are the expert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I frankly am pissed that we have to choose from one of these 2 awful candidates. Where are the smart people? How are we the United States of America and these are the only 2 that we have to choose from. One is a criminal and the other should have retired years ago. Neither is good for our country.

pP, I look at this election as a choice between what future I want to live in, not between two candidates. Between someone who is kind, wants everyone to have success and believes in democracy vs. someone who revels in cruelty, wants to pit Americans against each other and doesn’t believe in the rule of law.

There will only 1 outcome. What America do you want to live in?

I want to live in a country led by a generous individual, who wants to bring prosperity and success to all Americans, and who believes in elections without fraud.

That said, I do not want to continue to be led by a cruel old man who puts on a show of being a family man, but fails to acknowledge his youngest grandchild. I do not want to continue to be led by a man who claimed to be a uniter, but is really a divider, and who has tried to overwhelm his main opponent with multiple specious legal charges.

But who are we kidding? We all know the cruel old man was never in charge anyway! LOL

Well said.

Do you actually think Trump knows the names of his grandchildren? He cheated on 2 of his wives. Don’t think you want to go there about being a “family man”.

Trumps kids are healthy and Ivy educated. He leaves a trail of wealth and happiness

Joe leaves a scorched earth of inflation, war, drug addiction and mental failure.

Ever hear of Jan 6? So with Trump, there would be no Hamas, nor Ukraine war? How?