Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Give it a rest. The plane is at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. Very difficult to find, so it may take years. No conspiracy, no hijacking. Mechanical failure, pilot error, a tragic accident.
My prayers to the families. This has been torture for them. They need peace and time to grieve. No need to prolong their suffering. Their loved ones are gone, lost in the ocean.
What are you, the head of Malaysia? Sorry, but so far we don't have enough evidence to conclude the plane is at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. Time and continued search efforts will hopefully tell. Guess what? We still don't know if it was error or intentional either.
Good lord. Even the Australian prime minister took to a news conference last night, and said he agrees with the Malaysian PM's assertion that the plane is lost in the Indian Ocean. He agreed that all the evidence points to this, and it's a matter of finding it in the ocean - not a question of if it's in the ocean. Holding on to slight and irrational hope is common for grieving families with lots of questions, but the plane being in the Indian Ocean is 100% fact.
Do you really think that if the government, any government, suspected that a commercial airliner was hidden somewhere, and could be used to detonate explosives in or above a city, they would tell us that??? No way. Everyone would be freaking out.
omg u r ttly rite. i think bin ladin found a way to survive after he was dumped in the ocean, and his people flew the plane and picked him up in the indian ocean and then they flew to pakistan and are holding the ppl hostage and bin ladin is now piloting the plane. i mean really think about it. you can't prove this didn't happen.
NP. I realize you're making fun of PP, but are you implying that bin Laden is the only real terrorist in the world? If so, I'm embarrassed for you.
No, of course not. But "OMG Bin Ladin!" is the driving force behind the absurd hypothesis that the plane was hijacked to Pakistan. I'm embarrassed for idiotic tinfoil hat theorists.
What are you talking about? There has not been even 1 mention of Bin Ladin with the alternate theories or even on this whole thread. You do know that even with Bin Ladin dead terrorism still exists right? There is something very strange, myopic and even naïve about your posts. You also seem easily agitated. I almost wonder if this might be a middle schooler posting.
Then you haven't been paying attention to the numerous (or one very persistent) idiot who keeps posting that the plane was probably hijacked to Pakistan, for the only reason that the plane could be hiding in Pakistan because Bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan.
Now I am embarrassed for you. Pakistan =/= bin Laden. Good grief.
Oh dear. I'm so, so sorry for your sub-par reading comprehension. That's gotta suck.
No, dear - it's your reading comprehension that is sub-par. No one else has mentioned bin Laden, just you. Pakistan was one of several countries floated as a possible place where the plane could have landed. Kazakhstan was one of the others, and no one has mentioned bin Laden, just you. You're the one making false equivalencies.
You are a troll right? No one can really think this is what happened? You know the plane was not seen on radar in the US, maybe it's hiding out at Dulles in a secret hanger for terrorist. I heard a pilot say there is a secret terrorist hanger at Dulles.
|