Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t look good for the Blake and Ryan bots.

They called her a ducking terrorist because she wanted an intimacy coordinator and not to allow Baldoni in her trailer while she was breastfeeding. Did you not follow the enormous Sony leak? The culture there was shown to be incredibly toxic and hostile.

You’re a paid shill. Her behavior was batshit long BEFORE any of that manufactured nonsense.

No one is spending money to pay people to post on DCUM. The Sony leak was in 2014. I think that time tracks with her southern issues but what is the batshittery you speak of? She definitely ticked the oblivious white woman box, but what else was she doing BEFORE the Sony leak, which was not manufactured and is very well documented?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really need to know what the rest of Hollywood thinks of Blake and Ryan.

Even if they have some well-connected people in their corner, like the Damons, I don't see other producers and directors liking their behavior.

Their careers are over.

Keep telling yourself that. You think Ryan Reynolds won't be just fine? Who knows about Blake. Her issue is far more that she's aging out of leading lady roles and doesn't have the acting chops to go much further. It's Boldoni who has zero chance of recovering. You have a rep for creating a toxic sexist set--even if colleagues aren't sure about Blake they will believe Jenny Slate--you're done. No investors will chance that liability.

Baldoni and Wayfair are done. Didn’t they lie on their insurance paperwork? I don’t see how they even get insured moving forward (assuming anyone would work with them after this). They are a walking lawsuit at this point.

OK, but they are still working with actors like Scarjo and winning all kinds of awards and have a bunch of films coming out? Sure seems like at this point they’re still doing OK.

I see zero films due out in 2026 and none actually in production either. Everything else was in the can and pre-dated the lawsuit. Nice try though!

Looks like Baldoni has a project in post production, seems possible that is released this year.

Possible. I guess we'll see. Does not exactly suggest the studio is thriving though, does it?

There is no way concerns about liability aren't in issue for insurers now. Even if they're taking a wait and see attitude about the case, there seems to be little if any forward movement on current productions.

Well that will be settled in the next six months, one way or the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back and coming at this from a big picture perspective, I think some of you are going to be surprised with how high the bar is for SH in court, and the bar is even higher for the entertainment industry.

Since this case, people have been posting past cases women have lost. one that I recall was the Friends writers room - a woman writer was subjected to a horrific work environment, shown p-rn, was the butt of horribly explicit jokes. Treated horribly. And the case was dismissed on the basis that the writers were writing a show with a lot innuendo and crass humor and so that was going to come up.

Which is insane because friends is a very family friendly show, but that gives you a sense of where the bar is. Now granted friends was a long time ago, but I don’t think we’ve made a lot of progress since then. There are other cases where because it’s a Hollywood set people just don’t take it seriously.

The power of the me too movement was that we didn’t have to wait for the courts. Most men implicated in those first few years like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, and many others were not caught up in civil or criminal litigation. The beauty of it was that it was finally a time when women could come together to complain about bad behavior and men were held accountable, reputations were tarnished or ruined, often they were fired (unfortunately often with multi million dollar settlements, but it was a start.) They lost their jobs and their reputation and women weren’t being told they were crazy or being punished for speaking up.

I truly think that’s what Blake‘s team saw here which was why the first strategy was to go to the New York Times . I really think that they wanted to lead with the retaliation campaign and have that be the crux of the story but of course, in order to have retaliation, you have to have an element of SH to hold over Baldoni. I do not think they expected to have a SH case in court, and you can this see in their proceedings. A lot of the SH claims has been defanged. People in this thread are still talking about incidents that are no longer being considered in the court and you will not here about if this goes to trial. A lot of it has turned to workplace hostility and they’re still trying to lean on retaliation.

You need to brush up on the law that governs this case. You are making conclusions based on a misunderstanding of the law.

Then why, in an industry where there’s probably a little sexual harassment on every Hollywood set, does nobody go to court? Why when there’s women like Abigail Breslin who’s reasonably successful and has the means, come forward and complain about Aaron Eckhart, causing her such physical harm out of his anger that she needed an MRI - and clearly there is a video of this because they were filming on set - but yet that never saw the inside of a court and Aaron Eckhart is still being cast in movies?

Please explain how easy it is to take these cases to court, especially in this industry because reality shows us otherwise.

Because it usually never makes it to court.

But when it does go to Court, no one better for your star supporting witness that a comedian known for her crass humor that is offended by the word "sexy," but only if uttered by men. Oh, and also is very offended her bosses granted her wish for more expensive housing allowance.

You keep presenting this case as if it will be decided on one point. You don’t even know of that specific claim will come up at trial.

Trials are decided on the cumulative evidence presented. And then the jury will receive instructions on how the law applies to those facts. You keep cherry picking certain things, usually through an interpretation that favors the outcome you prefer, and assume that’s how it will play out in a court of law.

So many people watching this case don’t even understand depositions and why certain things are addressed while others are not.

The most interesting aspect of this case will be which claims survive to trial and how the motions on limine play out. But until then you simply cannot point to one piece of evidence and pretend it’s going to decide a case. Nor can you point to evidence that likely won’t even make it before a jury.

Not true at all, you are the one acting like the mountains of evidence discrediting Blake and her witnesses won't be heard.

Further, I've actually litigated cases before a jury. I can tell you have not.

And yet you ignore the mountains of evidence in Lively’s favor. I am not saying Justin/Wayfarer won’t be able to put on a defense (and maybe a formative one). But I cannot believe anyone with litigating experience believes they know which evidence will be presented and how it will be presented at this juncture.

But the answer to your question is yes, many. And I have done many more mock juries with professional companies, where we actually get to ask them which evidence was persuasive and why.

There is no such mountain. All you have been able to come up is that she was asked to film a scene topless and Health walked in her trailer when she was partially clothed.

Sorry you are neither a lawyer nor a litigator. Or if you are, you are akin to the ambulance chasers defending popcorn planer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really need to know what the rest of Hollywood thinks of Blake and Ryan.

Even if they have some well-connected people in their corner, like the Damons, I don't see other producers and directors liking their behavior.

Their careers are over.

Keep telling yourself that. You think Ryan Reynolds won't be just fine? Who knows about Blake. Her issue is far more that she's aging out of leading lady roles and doesn't have the acting chops to go much further. It's Boldoni who has zero chance of recovering. You have a rep for creating a toxic sexist set--even if colleagues aren't sure about Blake they will believe Jenny Slate--you're done. No investors will chance that liability.

Baldoni and Wayfair are done. Didn’t they lie on their insurance paperwork? I don’t see how they even get insured moving forward (assuming anyone would work with them after this). They are a walking lawsuit at this point.

OK, but they are still working with actors like Scarjo and winning all kinds of awards and have a bunch of films coming out? Sure seems like at this point they’re still doing OK.

I see zero films due out in 2026 and none actually in production either. Everything else was in the can and pre-dated the lawsuit. Nice try though!

Looks like Baldoni has a project in post production, seems possible that is released this year.

I just googled and quickly came up that Wayfarer has a bunch of movies coming out in 2026 and they’re doing a screening later this month so not sure what the PP is talking about

One issue is that Justin is behind the scenes and so Wayfarer will be easier to recover, Ryan and Blake are in front and so their image is going to be harder to recover. The average American following this loosely knows Blake and Ryan, but probably doesn’t recognize the name wayfarer and most people don’t think about the studio when they’re going to see a movie. think about the last couple films that you saw do you know if it’s Paramount or Sony or who produced it? Most people don’t. Whereas if you really don’t like an actor, you’re not going to see the movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

Respectfully, I don’t think many of us finding the arguments made in this thread persuasive. And I think many of us are reading the same documents and coming to very different conclusions about their content.

Seems like just one of you actually. Far more on the Baldoni side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back and coming at this from a big picture perspective, I think some of you are going to be surprised with how high the bar is for SH in court, and the bar is even higher for the entertainment industry.

Since this case, people have been posting past cases women have lost. one that I recall was the Friends writers room - a woman writer was subjected to a horrific work environment, shown p-rn, was the butt of horribly explicit jokes. Treated horribly. And the case was dismissed on the basis that the writers were writing a show with a lot innuendo and crass humor and so that was going to come up.

Which is insane because friends is a very family friendly show, but that gives you a sense of where the bar is. Now granted friends was a long time ago, but I don’t think we’ve made a lot of progress since then. There are other cases where because it’s a Hollywood set people just don’t take it seriously.

The power of the me too movement was that we didn’t have to wait for the courts. Most men implicated in those first few years like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, and many others were not caught up in civil or criminal litigation. The beauty of it was that it was finally a time when women could come together to complain about bad behavior and men were held accountable, reputations were tarnished or ruined, often they were fired (unfortunately often with multi million dollar settlements, but it was a start.) They lost their jobs and their reputation and women weren’t being told they were crazy or being punished for speaking up.

I truly think that’s what Blake‘s team saw here which was why the first strategy was to go to the New York Times . I really think that they wanted to lead with the retaliation campaign and have that be the crux of the story but of course, in order to have retaliation, you have to have an element of SH to hold over Baldoni. I do not think they expected to have a SH case in court, and you can this see in their proceedings. A lot of the SH claims has been defanged. People in this thread are still talking about incidents that are no longer being considered in the court and you will not here about if this goes to trial. A lot of it has turned to workplace hostility and they’re still trying to lean on retaliation.

You need to brush up on the law that governs this case. You are making conclusions based on a misunderstanding of the law.

Then why, in an industry where there’s probably a little sexual harassment on every Hollywood set, does nobody go to court? Why when there’s women like Abigail Breslin who’s reasonably successful and has the means, come forward and complain about Aaron Eckhart, causing her such physical harm out of his anger that she needed an MRI - and clearly there is a video of this because they were filming on set - but yet that never saw the inside of a court and Aaron Eckhart is still being cast in movies?

Please explain how easy it is to take these cases to court, especially in this industry because reality shows us otherwise.

Because it usually never makes it to court.

But when it does go to Court, no one better for your star supporting witness that a comedian known for her crass humor that is offended by the word "sexy," but only if uttered by men. Oh, and also is very offended her bosses granted her wish for more expensive housing allowance.

You keep presenting this case as if it will be decided on one point. You don’t even know of that specific claim will come up at trial.

Trials are decided on the cumulative evidence presented. And then the jury will receive instructions on how the law applies to those facts. You keep cherry picking certain things, usually through an interpretation that favors the outcome you prefer, and assume that’s how it will play out in a court of law.

So many people watching this case don’t even understand depositions and why certain things are addressed while others are not.

The most interesting aspect of this case will be which claims survive to trial and how the motions on limine play out. But until then you simply cannot point to one piece of evidence and pretend it’s going to decide a case. Nor can you point to evidence that likely won’t even make it before a jury.

Not true at all, you are the one acting like the mountains of evidence discrediting Blake and her witnesses won't be heard.

Further, I've actually litigated cases before a jury. I can tell you have not.

And yet you ignore the mountains of evidence in Lively’s favor. I am not saying Justin/Wayfarer won’t be able to put on a defense (and maybe a formative one). But I cannot believe anyone with litigating experience believes they know which evidence will be presented and how it will be presented at this juncture.

But the answer to your question is yes, many. And I have done many more mock juries with professional companies, where we actually get to ask them which evidence was persuasive and why.

There is no such mountain. All you have been able to come up is that she was asked to film a scene topless and Health walked in her trailer when she was partially clothed.

Sorry you are neither a lawyer nor a litigator. Or if you are, you are akin to the ambulance chasers defending popcorn planer.

Some more word salad nonsense from you. I can guarantee that I have you beat on legal pedigree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back and coming at this from a big picture perspective, I think some of you are going to be surprised with how high the bar is for SH in court, and the bar is even higher for the entertainment industry.

Since this case, people have been posting past cases women have lost. one that I recall was the Friends writers room - a woman writer was subjected to a horrific work environment, shown p-rn, was the butt of horribly explicit jokes. Treated horribly. And the case was dismissed on the basis that the writers were writing a show with a lot innuendo and crass humor and so that was going to come up.

Which is insane because friends is a very family friendly show, but that gives you a sense of where the bar is. Now granted friends was a long time ago, but I don’t think we’ve made a lot of progress since then. There are other cases where because it’s a Hollywood set people just don’t take it seriously.

The power of the me too movement was that we didn’t have to wait for the courts. Most men implicated in those first few years like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, and many others were not caught up in civil or criminal litigation. The beauty of it was that it was finally a time when women could come together to complain about bad behavior and men were held accountable, reputations were tarnished or ruined, often they were fired (unfortunately often with multi million dollar settlements, but it was a start.) They lost their jobs and their reputation and women weren’t being told they were crazy or being punished for speaking up.

I truly think that’s what Blake‘s team saw here which was why the first strategy was to go to the New York Times . I really think that they wanted to lead with the retaliation campaign and have that be the crux of the story but of course, in order to have retaliation, you have to have an element of SH to hold over Baldoni. I do not think they expected to have a SH case in court, and you can this see in their proceedings. A lot of the SH claims has been defanged. People in this thread are still talking about incidents that are no longer being considered in the court and you will not here about if this goes to trial. A lot of it has turned to workplace hostility and they’re still trying to lean on retaliation.

You need to brush up on the law that governs this case. You are making conclusions based on a misunderstanding of the law.

Then why, in an industry where there’s probably a little sexual harassment on every Hollywood set, does nobody go to court? Why when there’s women like Abigail Breslin who’s reasonably successful and has the means, come forward and complain about Aaron Eckhart, causing her such physical harm out of his anger that she needed an MRI - and clearly there is a video of this because they were filming on set - but yet that never saw the inside of a court and Aaron Eckhart is still being cast in movies?

Please explain how easy it is to take these cases to court, especially in this industry because reality shows us otherwise.

Because it usually never makes it to court.

But when it does go to Court, no one better for your star supporting witness that a comedian known for her crass humor that is offended by the word "sexy," but only if uttered by men. Oh, and also is very offended her bosses granted her wish for more expensive housing allowance.

You keep presenting this case as if it will be decided on one point. You don’t even know of that specific claim will come up at trial.

Trials are decided on the cumulative evidence presented. And then the jury will receive instructions on how the law applies to those facts. You keep cherry picking certain things, usually through an interpretation that favors the outcome you prefer, and assume that’s how it will play out in a court of law.

So many people watching this case don’t even understand depositions and why certain things are addressed while others are not.

The most interesting aspect of this case will be which claims survive to trial and how the motions on limine play out. But until then you simply cannot point to one piece of evidence and pretend it’s going to decide a case. Nor can you point to evidence that likely won’t even make it before a jury.

Not true at all, you are the one acting like the mountains of evidence discrediting Blake and her witnesses won't be heard.

Further, I've actually litigated cases before a jury. I can tell you have not.

And yet you ignore the mountains of evidence in Lively’s favor. I am not saying Justin/Wayfarer won’t be able to put on a defense (and maybe a formative one). But I cannot believe anyone with litigating experience believes they know which evidence will be presented and how it will be presented at this juncture.

But the answer to your question is yes, many. And I have done many more mock juries with professional companies, where we actually get to ask them which evidence was persuasive and why.

There is no such mountain. All you have been able to come up is that she was asked to film a scene topless and Health walked in her trailer when she was partially clothed.

Sorry you are neither a lawyer nor a litigator. Or if you are, you are akin to the ambulance chasers defending popcorn planer.

Some more word salad nonsense from you. I can guarantee that I have you beat on legal pedigree.

😂😂 Sure, Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really need to know what the rest of Hollywood thinks of Blake and Ryan.

Even if they have some well-connected people in their corner, like the Damons, I don't see other producers and directors liking their behavior.

Their careers are over.

Keep telling yourself that. You think Ryan Reynolds won't be just fine? Who knows about Blake. Her issue is far more that she's aging out of leading lady roles and doesn't have the acting chops to go much further. It's Boldoni who has zero chance of recovering. You have a rep for creating a toxic sexist set--even if colleagues aren't sure about Blake they will believe Jenny Slate--you're done. No investors will chance that liability.

Baldoni and Wayfair are done. Didn’t they lie on their insurance paperwork? I don’t see how they even get insured moving forward (assuming anyone would work with them after this). They are a walking lawsuit at this point.

OK, but they are still working with actors like Scarjo and winning all kinds of awards and have a bunch of films coming out? Sure seems like at this point they’re still doing OK.

I see zero films due out in 2026 and none actually in production either. Everything else was in the can and pre-dated the lawsuit. Nice try though!

Looks like Baldoni has a project in post production, seems possible that is released this year.

I just googled and quickly came up that Wayfarer has a bunch of movies coming out in 2026 and they’re doing a screening later this month so not sure what the PP is talking about

One issue is that Justin is behind the scenes and so Wayfarer will be easier to recover, Ryan and Blake are in front and so their image is going to be harder to recover. The average American following this loosely knows Blake and Ryan, but probably doesn’t recognize the name wayfarer and most people don’t think about the studio when they’re going to see a movie. think about the last couple films that you saw do you know if it’s Paramount or Sony or who produced it? Most people don’t. Whereas if you really don’t like an actor, you’re not going to see the movie.

Link please? Nothing on their website or a "quick Google" here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

Yea because their Queen Bee leader decreed it be so. Even Sony blamed Blake for this. Blake was working on this from preproduction on. And boy does Slate grovel at her feet. Her cross will really be something if she testifies at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

Brendan Sklenar was vocal in supporting Blake as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

Yea because their Queen Bee leader decreed it be so. Even Sony blamed Blake for this. Blake was working on this from preproduction on. And boy does Slate grovel at her feet. Her cross will really be something if she testifies at all.

Hoover had barely met Blake. She was turned off when Baldoni and Heath took her to dinner to talk sh!t about Blake. It turned her against them, not Blake. She became concerned he wouldn't pass her notes to Blake while she was doing her edit, so e-mailed Blake, Blake asked for her number, and then their working relationship turned out to be good.

You also have the IC Lizzy Talbot live texting a friend all "OMG" that Baldoni was so gross when shooting Ferrer's scenes. And Talbot has only met Blake once.

Not hard to believe at all that the actresses also came to their conclusions independently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

Yea because their Queen Bee leader decreed it be so. Even Sony blamed Blake for this. Blake was working on this from preproduction on. And boy does Slate grovel at her feet. Her cross will really be something if she testifies at all.

Slate is on the record, during production and promotion, independent of Blake. He told a 20-something her sex scene was "hot"? Gross, gross, gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the actresses banded together and refused to do any promotion with Boldoni. No way they'd all want professional drama without there being any 'there' there. Their depositions will in all likelihood demonstrate consistency re: the SH claims. It's not just Blake, and not just Jenny.

The deposition excerpts have been released and this is not the case at all. Do you even read the documents? For that matter, follow the arguments being made on this thread?

«In court documents, obtained by TMZ, text messages sent by one of the film's stars, Jenny Slate, show she didn't want to do anything with Justin or his "truly unprofessional" business partner Jamey Heath back in 2023 -- the year the film began production.

Slate wrote, "This has really been a disturbing shoot, and I'm one of many who feel this way, and Blake and I have both complained directly to Ange [production executive Andrea Giannetti] at Sony (and they agree w us btw). Justin is truly a false ally and I'm unwilling to do anything that promotes the image that he's crafting as a 'male feminist' ... like ... honestly I have no words to describe what a fraud he is."

She continued ... "I honestly have never ever encountered anything like this dude. He's the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist."

Later in a deposition, Slate is quoted as saying, "Justin and Jamey freak me out." According to the deposition transcript, Slate was concerned about how much "crap" Lively had to take from Justin and Jamey, and accused the two men of telling "weird lies."

Additionally, an email sent from "It Ends With Us" author Colleen Hoover to Sony on July 14, 2024, shows that she was reluctant to show up at the premiere.

She wrote, "Am I going to be comfortable if Justin is there? No, things are beyond uncomfortable at this point."

Actress Isabela Ferrer was asked in a deposition about filming an intimate scene involving two teenagers, after which she says Baldoni commented on it being "hot" ... Ferrer said "It didn't feel appropriate in a work environment," and didn't feel like a note about her acting, saying it was out of place and "personal."


Are there any actresses backing up Boldoni on this production? Sure doesn't sound like it.

Aren't these the three core actresses in the cast, and all refused to do promotion with him?

Yes, but apparently they are all liar and their claims should be dismissed. But not due to misogyny. Just feels.