GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Where do you get this "duffel bags and backpacks full of cash" bullshit? There is absolutely ZERO in introduced evidence or testimony to support this. Did she have a few k in cash at her home? Sure. And it was probably less than $10k based on the testimony she gave. And so what? Since when is that some kind of crime? I could name a dozen or more people who probably have more than that in their till or wallet at any given time, whether contractors going to buy materials or restauranteurs et cetera and those numbers will easily scale out to the millions nationally. If it's some kind of big crime then why aren't we focusing on the commercials to buy gold bullion that come on conservative talk radio literally every 5 minutes? And if you don't know what I'm talking about here then maybe you need to step away from this conversation completely because you are definitely and unequivocably clueless on the subject.

She’s broke as a joke and can’t pay her bills. Tax liens. But yeah, sure, she keeps 10 to 15 grand — “Gs” — on her at all times to pay off bedfellows. Oh and she can’t even prove when she withdrew the alleged cash from the bank. lol

What the judge should do (but probably won't) is to put a hold on this hearing and force Fani to provide evidence that she has withdrawn significant amounts of cash over a period of time to prove she repaid her lover in cash.
Should be easy to do - if she is telling the truth.

Stop mischaracterizing her testimony. She never said she’s “withdrawn significant amounts of cash.” She said she gets cash every time she goes to Publix.

That was one of her explanations. And, we all know that the amount of money you can get in a cash back transaction is limited.
She needs to provide the proof.

If she gets it $40-100 at a time, then it is pretty easy to build up, as her testimony claimed.

And now, she doesn't need to provide the proof. The burden is on the other side. You aren't getting this. The case is about Trump stealing an election. This is all a sideshow. Stop falling for it. If you keep going down for these lies, you will believe that someone paid Joe Biden $5M for Burisma or something or other.

LOL. You’re a cultist just as bad as the MAGA crazies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

Please show where there is any corruption or conflict of interest?

Because there isn't a single serious legal mind that agrees with you.

I guess you don't consider the legal minds on MSNBC serious.....

Trump appointee and George Papadopoulos’s lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dani Willis: "When I took out a large amount of money from my first campaign, I kept some of the cash of that."

I think that is from yesterday's testimony and If true, that is another potential criminal violation and ethical violation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All of this. Privileged women who have never been through this will never understand, and men, never will either.

Yes, Fani killed it on the stand today but something stood out to me that I think needs more attention. Before she went into the amounts of cash she keeps on hand, at home etc. She said that after her divorce in 2011 or 2012, that she began keeping money at home. As a survivor of domestic abuse, that stood out to me. My first thought was ‘that’s her getaway money.’

My first husband controlled EVERYTHING. I didn’t have my own bank acct, didn’t have a car of my own and wasn’t ‘allowed’ to drive his. He took me to work and picked me up. I never went to a grocery store alone. I will never forget the day we got into an argument at Kinkos and he took off and left me to walk home. Took about 3.5 hrs in the blistering desert heat walking along the I-10 svc road. This was the early ‘90s, before everyone had a cell phone and Uber was available.

I don’t care how smart or successful you are, if you have ever been a victim of abuse—be it physical, verbal, mental or emotional—it stays with you. That vow you make to yourself to never rely on another again. Taking back, protecting and keeping your power. So I get Fani’s frustration and anger and being questioned the way she was. Having someone who has not walked in her shoes attempt to try and shame her.

Her reasons are nobody’s business, and I have no doubt that she kept a lot of her reasons to herself. They don’t deserve to know why, they are not entitled to the part of her that guides the choices she makes in regard to her finances. That’s hers. It belongs to her and I stand with her…

When you have to whip up absurd word vomit excuses for a 50 year old woman you’ve lost. This is a corrupt power drunk idiot and we can all see it clear as day. I only drink ‘goose. Good lord, she’s ratchet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Where do you get this "duffel bags and backpacks full of cash" bullshit? There is absolutely ZERO in introduced evidence or testimony to support this. Did she have a few k in cash at her home? Sure. And it was probably less than $10k based on the testimony she gave. And so what? Since when is that some kind of crime? I could name a dozen or more people who probably have more than that in their till or wallet at any given time, whether contractors going to buy materials or restauranteurs et cetera and those numbers will easily scale out to the millions nationally. If it's some kind of big crime then why aren't we focusing on the commercials to buy gold bullion that come on conservative talk radio literally every 5 minutes? And if you don't know what I'm talking about here then maybe you need to step away from this conversation completely because you are definitely and unequivocably clueless on the subject.

She’s broke as a joke and can’t pay her bills. Tax liens. But yeah, sure, she keeps 10 to 15 grand — “Gs” — on her at all times to pay off bedfellows. Oh and she can’t even prove when she withdrew the alleged cash from the bank. lol

What the judge should do (but probably won't) is to put a hold on this hearing and force Fani to provide evidence that she has withdrawn significant amounts of cash over a period of time to prove she repaid her lover in cash.
Should be easy to do - if she is telling the truth.

Stop mischaracterizing her testimony. She never said she’s “withdrawn significant amounts of cash.” She said she gets cash every time she goes to Publix.

That was one of her explanations. And, we all know that the amount of money you can get in a cash back transaction is limited.
She needs to provide the proof.

If she gets it $40-100 at a time, then it is pretty easy to build up, as her testimony claimed.

And now, she doesn't need to provide the proof. The burden is on the other side. You aren't getting this. The case is about Trump stealing an election. This is all a sideshow. Stop falling for it. If you keep going down for these lies, you will believe that someone paid Joe Biden $5M for Burisma or something or other.

LOL. You’re a cultist just as bad as the MAGA crazies.

I think you don't understand this case, the testimony or what this is about. That doesn't make me a "crazy"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this. Privileged women who have never been through this will never understand, and men, never will either.

Yes, Fani killed it on the stand today but something stood out to me that I think needs more attention. Before she went into the amounts of cash she keeps on hand, at home etc. She said that after her divorce in 2011 or 2012, that she began keeping money at home. As a survivor of domestic abuse, that stood out to me. My first thought was ‘that’s her getaway money.’

My first husband controlled EVERYTHING. I didn’t have my own bank acct, didn’t have a car of my own and wasn’t ‘allowed’ to drive his. He took me to work and picked me up. I never went to a grocery store alone. I will never forget the day we got into an argument at Kinkos and he took off and left me to walk home. Took about 3.5 hrs in the blistering desert heat walking along the I-10 svc road. This was the early ‘90s, before everyone had a cell phone and Uber was available.

I don’t care how smart or successful you are, if you have ever been a victim of abuse—be it physical, verbal, mental or emotional—it stays with you. That vow you make to yourself to never rely on another again. Taking back, protecting and keeping your power. So I get Fani’s frustration and anger and being questioned the way she was. Having someone who has not walked in her shoes attempt to try and shame her.

Her reasons are nobody’s business, and I have no doubt that she kept a lot of her reasons to herself. They don’t deserve to know why, they are not entitled to the part of her that guides the choices she makes in regard to her finances. That’s hers. It belongs to her and I stand with her…

When you have to whip up absurd word vomit excuses for a 50 year old woman you’ve lost. This is a corrupt power drunk idiot and we can all see it clear as day. I only drink ‘goose. Good lord, she’s ratchet.

So in your world, it is a crime to keep a stash of cash in your own house?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

Please show where there is any corruption or conflict of interest?

Because there isn't a single serious legal mind that agrees with you.

I guess you don't consider the legal minds on MSNBC serious.....

Trump appointee and George Papadopoulos’s lawyer.

That was even before she gave any testimony.

People on cable news give hot takes prematurely. Their audiences are usually too dumb to notice.

[Anonymous]

So now it is a crime if dad doesn't know everyone his daughter is schtooping?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this. Privileged women who have never been through this will never understand, and men, never will either.

Yes, Fani killed it on the stand today but something stood out to me that I think needs more attention. Before she went into the amounts of cash she keeps on hand, at home etc. She said that after her divorce in 2011 or 2012, that she began keeping money at home. As a survivor of domestic abuse, that stood out to me. My first thought was ‘that’s her getaway money.’

My first husband controlled EVERYTHING. I didn’t have my own bank acct, didn’t have a car of my own and wasn’t ‘allowed’ to drive his. He took me to work and picked me up. I never went to a grocery store alone. I will never forget the day we got into an argument at Kinkos and he took off and left me to walk home. Took about 3.5 hrs in the blistering desert heat walking along the I-10 svc road. This was the early ‘90s, before everyone had a cell phone and Uber was available.

I don’t care how smart or successful you are, if you have ever been a victim of abuse—be it physical, verbal, mental or emotional—it stays with you. That vow you make to yourself to never rely on another again. Taking back, protecting and keeping your power. So I get Fani’s frustration and anger and being questioned the way she was. Having someone who has not walked in her shoes attempt to try and shame her.

Her reasons are nobody’s business, and I have no doubt that she kept a lot of her reasons to herself. They don’t deserve to know why, they are not entitled to the part of her that guides the choices she makes in regard to her finances. That’s hers. It belongs to her and I stand with her…

When you have to whip up absurd word vomit excuses for a 50 year old woman you’ve lost. This is a corrupt power drunk idiot and we can all see it clear as day. I only drink ‘goose. Good lord, she’s ratchet.

So in your world, it is a crime to keep a stash of cash in your own house?

The doomsday preppers stash plenty of cash and gold. Way, way more than this lady. Waaayyyy more

[Anonymous]

She only makes $110K but the cult gaslights like she withdrew thousands of cash advances at the grocery store to have “Gs” to walk around with and pay off her bedfellow. Hilarious! Y’all are so shameless. Just as bad as the crazy Trumpsters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

Please show where there is any corruption or conflict of interest?

Because there isn't a single serious legal mind that agrees with you.

I guess you don't consider the legal minds on MSNBC serious.....

Trump appointee and George Papadopoulos’s lawyer.

Do you mean this Chuck Rosenberg whom Atty General Loretta Lynch praised in 2015 when Obama was President?https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-announces-new-acting-administrator-drug-enforcement-administration

[Anonymous]

Chuck Rosenberg has had some crappy takes as of late

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Rosenberg has had some crappy takes as of late

Translation: "I really don't like it when someone on MSNBC disagrees with me."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Rosenberg has had some crappy takes as of late

Translation: "I really don't like it when someone on MSNBC disagrees with me."

Nah. He’s just been wrong a lot. His predictions haven’t come to fruition, and I’ve been a little surprised.

[Anonymous]

Make no mistake - the case in GA scares the crap out of Trump because it's a state case and he can't pardon himself even if he somehow manages to win in November. The kitchen sink defense he's throwing up is clearly out of desperation. Fortunately, it's failing miserably (as has everything else in his pathetic life).