GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Make no mistake - the case in GA scares the crap out of Trump because it's a state case and he can't pardon himself even if he somehow manages to win in November. The kitchen sink defense he's throwing up is clearly out of desperation. Fortunately, it's failing miserably (as has everything else in his pathetic life).

If it wasn't a serious case, none of his attorneys would have taken the pleas and turned states evidence. Again, thise whole thing with Fanni and Wade is just a distraction. It is ponderous it has made it this far because it is part of judicial abuse.

[Anonymous]

So now the Trump attorneys want to prosecute adultery as a crime?

[Anonymous]

How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

lololol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

Really? Because last I heard, she is not now and never was President of the United States. Have you looked at the thread about corrupt Republican officials lately? It's very long. Because Republicans are corrupt as a rule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

Please prove that she lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

She is cluelessly confident. She is a good liar and knows it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

She is cluelessly confident. She is a good liar and knows it.

Or, she is telling the truth and YOU are clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

She is cluelessly confident. She is a good liar and knows it.

WTFV. The body language expert calls her “direct and forthcoming.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

She is cluelessly confident. She is a good liar and knows it.

WTFV. The body language expert calls her “direct and forthcoming.”

Yep. She believes her lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

apropos of nothing...

She is cluelessly confident. She is a good liar and knows it.

WTFV. The body language expert calls her “direct and forthcoming.”

Yep. She believes her lies.

Or, occams razor, she is not lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

Please prove that she lied.

Well, she herself testified that you only need one evidence to prove a fact. Two witnesses have now testified that the relationship began prior to Wade's appointment, which means Willis lied. But I am guessing you won't accept that as proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this contract swinging and money laundering? All told, Fani gave her lover Nathan five Fulton County contracts totaling almost $1 million. Fani is under a state misconduct probe for personally benefiting from these contracts thru lavish vacations, gifts paid for by Nathan.

He was paid an hourly rate much lower than what he was making in the private sector. His hours were certified and capped, like everyone else on contract.

There is no proof she benefited personally in any way.

None.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How someone reacts to the Fani testimony is a litmus test for if they're a complete partisan hack. Anyone who denies that she clearly lied, could not respond to basic questions, acted inappropriately, and corrupted this prosecution is a mindless DNC cult partisan, no better than MAGA cult partisans.

Please prove that she lied.

Proof? Nah, they just KNOW.