Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that’s a no on an indictment. Cool.

Durham is not done yet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meadows-previews-school-reopening-plans-durham-probe-results-i-expect-indictments

Nice article from July 19. Lol. Trump and Trumpians are such chimps. It’s incredible his supporters live until adulthood. Here’s what’s going to happen in this case. It will be remanded, rightfully so, to Sullivan. Hopefully, it drags out past November and then actual normal human beings can look at with the close jurisprudence it requires and Flynn will go to jail for being the traitorous, Qanon, pizzagate conspiracy loser that he is.

WTH are you talking about. This is not about Flynn.
It's about all those in the Obama-Biden administration who are in deep doo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that’s a no on an indictment. Cool.

Durham is not done yet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meadows-previews-school-reopening-plans-durham-probe-results-i-expect-indictments

Nice article from July 19. Lol. Trump and Trumpians are such chimps. It’s incredible his supporters live until adulthood. Here’s what’s going to happen in this case. It will be remanded, rightfully so, to Sullivan. Hopefully, it drags out past November and then actual normal human beings can look at with the close jurisprudence it requires and Flynn will go to jail for being the traitorous, Qanon, pizzagate conspiracy loser that he is.

WTH are you talking about. This is not about Flynn.
It's about all those in the Obama-Biden administration who are in deep doo.

Oh boy it’s too funny, buuuut also sad, you really think anything is going to happen. You believe in right wing fairytales. There is no deep state. It’s just that you’re impressionable and fox media does a great job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that’s a no on an indictment. Cool.

Durham is not done yet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meadows-previews-school-reopening-plans-durham-probe-results-i-expect-indictments

Nice article from July 19. Lol. Trump and Trumpians are such chimps. It’s incredible his supporters live until adulthood. Here’s what’s going to happen in this case. It will be remanded, rightfully so, to Sullivan. Hopefully, it drags out past November and then actual normal human beings can look at with the close jurisprudence it requires and Flynn will go to jail for being the traitorous, Qanon, pizzagate conspiracy loser that he is.

WTH are you talking about. This is not about Flynn.
It's about all those in the Obama-Biden administration who are in deep doo.

Oh boy it’s too funny, buuuut also sad, you really think anything is going to happen. You believe in right wing fairytales. There is no deep state. It’s just that you’re impressionable and fox media does a great job.

Time will tell, my friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that’s a no on an indictment. Cool.

Durham is not done yet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meadows-previews-school-reopening-plans-durham-probe-results-i-expect-indictments

Nice article from July 19. Lol. Trump and Trumpians are such chimps. It’s incredible his supporters live until adulthood. Here’s what’s going to happen in this case. It will be remanded, rightfully so, to Sullivan. Hopefully, it drags out past November and then actual normal human beings can look at with the close jurisprudence it requires and Flynn will go to jail for being the traitorous, Qanon, pizzagate conspiracy loser that he is.

WTH are you talking about. This is not about Flynn.
It's about all those in the Obama-Biden administration who are in deep doo.

Of course this is about Flynn.

Are there statute of limitations concerns if it’s remanded back to Judge Sullivan?

[Anonymous]

WASHINGTON—A former Federal Bureau of Investigation lawyer is expected to plead guilty Friday to a charge of altering a key document used to justify the surveillance of a onetime Trump campaign adviser, his lawyer said.
Kevin Clinesmith, an attorney who worked with FBI agents on some of the surveillance warrants against Carter Page, is expected to plead guilty to a false statement charge, according to his lawyer.

“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email. It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility,” Mr. Clinesmith’s lawyer said in a statement.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-fbi-lawyer-expected-to-plead-guilty-to-altering-document-on-trump-aide-surveillance-11597423043

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WASHINGTON—A former Federal Bureau of Investigation lawyer is expected to plead guilty Friday to a charge of altering a key document used to justify the surveillance of a onetime Trump campaign adviser, his lawyer said.
Kevin Clinesmith, an attorney who worked with FBI agents on some of the surveillance warrants against Carter Page, is expected to plead guilty to a false statement charge, according to his lawyer.

“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email. It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility,” Mr. Clinesmith’s lawyer said in a statement.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-fbi-lawyer-expected-to-plead-guilty-to-altering-document-on-trump-aide-surveillance-11597423043

Wow. How many tens of miliions of dollars did it cost to nail this low level government bureaucrat? Thank you President Trump!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WASHINGTON—A former Federal Bureau of Investigation lawyer is expected to plead guilty Friday to a charge of altering a key document used to justify the surveillance of a onetime Trump campaign adviser, his lawyer said.
Kevin Clinesmith, an attorney who worked with FBI agents on some of the surveillance warrants against Carter Page, is expected to plead guilty to a false statement charge, according to his lawyer.

“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email. It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility,” Mr. Clinesmith’s lawyer said in a statement.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-fbi-lawyer-expected-to-plead-guilty-to-altering-document-on-trump-aide-surveillance-11597423043

Wow. How many tens of miliions of dollars did it cost to nail this low level government bureaucrat? Thank you President Trump!

Sounds like Horowitz did all of the heavy lifting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WASHINGTON—A former Federal Bureau of Investigation lawyer is expected to plead guilty Friday to a charge of altering a key document used to justify the surveillance of a onetime Trump campaign adviser, his lawyer said.
Kevin Clinesmith, an attorney who worked with FBI agents on some of the surveillance warrants against Carter Page, is expected to plead guilty to a false statement charge, according to his lawyer.

“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email. It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility,” Mr. Clinesmith’s lawyer said in a statement.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-fbi-lawyer-expected-to-plead-guilty-to-altering-document-on-trump-aide-surveillance-11597423043

Wow. How many tens of miliions of dollars did it cost to nail this low level government bureaucrat? Thank you President Trump!

Sounds like Horowitz did all of the heavy lifting.

Horowitz revealed the problems with Crossfire Hurricane--and, remember much of Crossfire Hurricane team was also on the Mueller team. That's a problem.

[Anonymous]

En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

I don't think you understand the composition of the the Appeals Court if that is your statement. And it is pretty rich given how many appointees of Obama's were shelved by McConnell.

The ruling is rooted in law, try reading it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

They do NOT want Flynn talking before the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

I don't think you understand the composition of the the Appeals Court if that is your statement. And it is pretty rich given how many appointees of Obama's were shelved by McConnell.

The ruling is rooted in law, try reading it.

DP. This will be appealed and, depending on the timing, the SC may deny cert or may take it up. But eventually, it'll go back to Sullivan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

They do NOT want Flynn talking before the election.

Flynn is a crazy Qanoner. No one cares about whatever nonsense he might say except for other Qanoners and trolls.

Sane people want to see justice done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:En Banc panel reject Flynn's motion 8-2 and remands to Judge Sullivan. the opinion is a full repudiation of Barr and Powell.

Nice to see SOMETHING normal happening in our country right now.

All stacked with Obiden appointees. SCOTUS will reject this ruling

I don't think you understand the composition of the the Appeals Court if that is your statement. And it is pretty rich given how many appointees of Obama's were shelved by McConnell.

The ruling is rooted in law, try reading it.

I don't think you understand criminal law as it relates to the appeals court if that is your state,ent. And it's pretty thin given this is the first criminal case ever in the history of our republic where the prosecutor dropped the case due to the hiding of brady material..